Local Government

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF LAKE

SUMMARY OF ADOPTED ORDINANCE

 


The Board of Supervisors has adopted Ordinance No. 2969, AMENDING SECTION 21-3.7OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF LAKE BY ADOPTING A SECTIONAL DISTRICT ZONING MAP NO. 3.7(b)1.385 REZONING A PORTION OF THE LANDS OF GARDNER. This ordinance changes the zoning of the properties listed below from “RR” Rural Residential District and “RR-SOS” Rural Residential District; Substandard Older Subdivision Combining District, to “PDC-DR” Planned Development Commercial District; Design Review Combining District. The project applicant is Dr. Robert Gardner; project located at 5440, 5460, 5490 & 5610 E. State Highway 20; 5130 Foothill Drive; 5163, 5169 & 5173 Dunstan Road; 5563 & 5573 Dunstan Drive; 5637, 5647, 5667, 5687 & 5697 Fennel Road; 5707 Fennel Drive and 5069 Windsor Drive, Lucerne, CA (APNs 004-035-03; 033-351-17, 18, 47, 50 & 62; and 033-361-04, 29, 31, 33, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 & 45).


This ordinance was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday, January 24, 2012, by the following vote:


AYES: Supervisors Comstock, Smith, Farrington and Brown

NOES: None

ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: Supervisor Rushing Absent


This ordinance will take effect on February 23, 2012.


A certified copy of the full text of the proposed ordinance is posted for public review on the First Floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, California. For further information, contact the Office of the Clerk of the Board, at 707-263-2371.

 


KELLY F. COX

Clerk of the Board


By: Mireya G. Turner

Assistant Clerk to the Board

LAKEPORT, Calif. -- The plans for a proposed Northshore health resort took another step forward this week.


Following a public hearing Tuesday morning, the Board of Supervisors voted 4-0 -- with Supervisor Denise Rushing absent -- to approve a rezone, mitigated negative declaration and general plan of development for Dr. Robert Gardner’s proposed Utopia Mine Resort.


Gardner is proposing to build the health and hospitality resort in phases. At buildout it is expected to have a guest lodge, 24 villas, 25 cabins, 100 suites and medical-, health- and spa-related amenities on numerous parcels on the hillside overlooking Clear Lake between Nice and Lucerne.


The project will be located at 5440, 5460, 5490 and 5610 E. State Highway 20; 5130 Foothill Drive; 5163, 5169 and 5173 Dunstan Road; 5563 and 5573 Dunstan Drive; 5637, 5647, 5667, 5687 and 5697 Fennel Road; 5707 Fennel Drive and 5069 Windsor Drive, Lucerne.


The Lake County Planning Commission voted unanimously Dec. 8 to move the project forward to the board, as Lake County News has reported.


Community Development Director Rick Coel and Senior Planner Kevin Ingram presented the project to the board.


Ingram told the board that its approvals wouldn’t allow building to start, as there were still many steps and a lot of review in the process ahead.


Gardner showed the board pictures of how he’s improved the property, including tearing down old buildings and cleaning up illegal dumping.


A number of groups and individuals expressed support for the proposed resort.


Victoria Brandon of the Sierra Club Lake Group commended Gardner for his approach to the project, noting that he went to the group years ago to ask for input. He subsequently addressed their concerns as the project evolved.


Brandon said she thinks the resort will be “a tremendous benefit for the community.”


The last remaining concern involves Gardner’s proposal to build a seaplane dock on the lake. While transportation is an issue for the county, “We’ve lost too much lakeside vegetation already,” Brandon said.


Gardner has since told the group that he’s willing to plan more lakeside vegetation, according to Brandon.


Brandon said she hopes other developers bring forward projects like Gardner’s and involve the community in the planning process.


Attorney Andre Ross, representing the Lake County Chamber of Commerce Legislative Committee, said the group believes Gardner’s project is a good one, and that it will be economically beneficial.


Carol Cole-Lewis of Thrive Lake County and Gary Lewis of the North Shore Business Association also expressed support.


In response to questions about mercury levels at the site, Gardner told the board that tests revealed that mercury levels in the project area actually are below average.


Supervisor Jeff Smith said he knew how badly Gardner had wanted to do the project for many years.


“It’s just exactly what we’ve been looking for in Lake County,” Smith said.


Ingram said the next steps will involve Gardner bringing back specifics about the site plan.


Added Coel, “Think of today’s action as just the regulatory umbrella.”


Board Chair Rob Brown said the project has been on the radar a long time.


The paper lots on the hillsides have been the focus of many complaints due to garbage dumping, poaching and off-road motorcycles, he said.


“In my opinion, this is what would end all that,” he said.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Google+, on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday directed county departments to complete a report on the potential impacts of a proposed medical marijuana cultivation initiative in preparation for a decision on whether to adopt the document as a county ordinance or put it on the June ballot.


In the 3-1 vote, with Supervisor Anthony Farrington voting no, the supervisors directed marketing, Lake County Water Resources, Lake County Air Quality Management District, the agricultural commissioner, the Community Development Department, county counsel, the Lake County Sheriff’s Office, the Lake County District Attorney’s Office and Lake County Probation to weigh in on the possible impacts of the “Lake County Medical Marijuana Cultivation Act of 2012.”


The proposed initiative was submitted by the Lake County Citizens for Responsible Regulations and Lake County Green Farmers Association, which gathered signatures for the effort.


Lake County Registrar of Voters Diane Fridley took to the board an elections official’s certificate on the proposed initiative at the Tuesday meeting.


Her report said that 3,285 signatures were submitted in support of the initiative, with her staff checking all of those signatures.


Of those, 2,134 were found sufficient, just 19 more than the required 2,115, Fridley reported. Approximately 1,151 signatures were found not to be sufficient, with 787 of those from people who are not registered to vote in the county.


Fridley said the board needed to decide whether to accept the initiative in its entirely as a county ordinance or to put it before the voters this June.


The board also had the option of asking county departments to study and report on the proposed initiative’s impacts, Fridley said.


Farrington asked County Counsel Anita Grant if the board could amend the initiative if it adopted the document as a county ordinance.


Grant said no, that it couldn’t be amended or repealed unless voted upon by the county’s electorate.


Don Merrill, a spokesman for the Lake County Citizens for Responsible Regulations and Lake County Green Farmers Association, addressed issues of concern, including the document allowing for the growing of up to 84 plants on larger parcels. He also said the groups did not agree that marijuana leads to more crimes.


He argued that the document gave the county new authority to deal with nuisance issues, a position with which Grant – when asked to respond by Board Chair Rob Brown – didn’t agree.


The document does have a severability clause as most ordinances do. “It doesn’t necessarily mean the county is going to gain a particular authority,” she said.


Merrill said the groups urged the board to accept their initiative as an ordinance.


Brown supported doing the report to understand the impacts, which he said are going to be significant. He also suggested there was a bias in the information the groups had presented to the board in favor of the initiative.


Lower Lake attorney Ron Green asked the board to adopt the initiative. If they waited to put it on the June ballot, and it failed, he said they would have nothing in place during the upcoming growing season.


“This ordinance may not be perfect but it gives the county a way to deal with the huge grows,” said Green.


He also maintained that it would allow for smaller grows on residential parcels to be abated if they proved to be nuisances.


“I urge the board to adopt this,” he said. “Give it a chance.”


In response to Green’s request that the board give the document a chance, Brown said, “I keep hearing you say things that are so ironic.”


Brown said the board had asked for its marijuana cultivation ordinance, Ordinance No. 2960, adopted last fall, also to be given a chance.


However, the Lake County Citizens for Responsible Regulations and Lake County Green Farmers Association gathered signatures for a referendum on that document, which the board rescinded Jan. 3, deciding it would not put it on the June ballot, Brown pointed out.


Green said they needed something in place to deal with large grows, and commented that even banks attract crime. Brown responded that in the past month there have been more home invasion robberies due to marijuana than there have been bank robberies in the county’s entire history.


The board also raised concerns about protections for marijuana growing under the Right to Farm Ordinance. Green said those protections would not extend to residential or suburban reserve zoning.


Farrington questioned if they could abate smaller nuisance grows, even if they were under the 12 plant limit in residential areas. Green maintained they could.


Farrington asked Grant if she agreed with that interpretation.


Grant said she found Green’s interpretation “reasonable,” but noted that there are other possible interpretations, and predicted it would be tested because of the way it was generally crafted.


“It can go either way is essentially what I am telling you,” she said.


“It’s not clear cut,” said Brown.


Like Brown, Supervisor Jeff Smith said he found it ironic to hear the initiative’s proponents asking that their document be given a chance, when they didn’t give the county’s ordinance a chance. He supported studying the initiative’s impacts.


“Let’s look at it and at least we’ll be better informed how to answer questions when it does go on the ballot,” he said.


Comstock agreed, adding that he could foresee huge challenges regarding the document’s interpretation.


He added, “Our ordinance was a compromise. There are no compromises here.”


John Brosnan of Upper Lake, who has identified himself to Lake County News as president of the Lake County Green Farmers Association, told the board the initiative had arisen because the county’s ordinance prevented outdoor grows in residential areas.


He said the county can’t corral all of its marijuana-related issues in one ordinance. He added that the federal government is overstepping its boundaries regarding marijuana.


“I can assure you the reason we started an ordinance was the residential use,” replied Brown.


Brown predicted the initiative would fail at the June election. “The folks are sick of it,” he said of residential grows.


Walter Zuercher of the Clearlake Riviera agreed, noting they were against growing marijuana in residential areas. Over the last four to five years it had resulted in a lot of problems in the subdivision, he said.


Regarding the initiative, Brown noted, “I’m sure I’m not the only one that resents the fact this is being considered an agricultural crop.”


Smith said he has received numerous complaints about marijuana grows in residential areas, with people losing their basic rights to use their properties. “That is ridiculous to me and that is why we had to take the stand we took in our ordinance.”


He said the marijuana advocacy groups have put themselves in the position of not having a document in place by June because of their opposition to the county’s cultivation ordinance. Smith added that he wanted to see the report on the initiative’s possible repercussions.


Green said the county already has the power to act on nuisance grows. Smith responded that the homeowners he’s spoken to are afraid of possible repercussions if they make reports.


Farrington wanted the board to take action to put the initiative on the ballot Tuesday. He also questioned the time and resources that would be spent on completing a report.


However, Comstock, Brown and Smith favored the report, which Grant said would consider impacts on fiscal-related matters, land use, infrastructure, business and employment, vacant parcels, agriculture and law enforcement. Brown added that it was the board’s job to determine the initiative’s impacts on the county.


The board voted 3-1 to direct the report be made, and that it be brought back by Feb. 21, at which time they must make a decision.


Grant pointed out that if the reports come back showing that the initiative would be a viable county ordinance, that the board’s position is not intractable, and that the supervisors can consider adopting it at that time.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Google+, on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .




012412 Elections Officer Certification - Marijuana Culivation Initiative




110411 Lake County Marijuana Cultivation Initiative

CLEARLAKE, Calif. – The Clearlake City Council will discuss more redevelopment-related business as it faces the impending closure of its redevelopment agency, and also will consider city business including adding new bank signatories.


The council will gather in the council chambers at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive, for a closed session at 4 p.m. Thursday, Jan. 26, to hold performance evaluations on interim City Administrator Joan Phillipe and interim Police Chief Craig Clausen before the regular session opens at 6 p.m. TV8 will broadcast the meeting live.


Phillipe will take to the council a proposed resolution to add more signatories to the city’s commercial accounts and for its local agency investment fund, or LAIF.


Due to staff turnover the city currently has only two people – City Clerk Melissa Swanson and Clausen – who are authorized to sign on the accounts, and Phillipe’s report voices concern about being able to transfer money from the accounts should an urgent need arise.


She reported that most cities have four people authorized to sign, including the city administrator and finance director.


Phillipe also is proposing that the council obtain signature stamps for Mayor Joey Luiz and Vice Mayor Jeri Spittler, which would allow the two to avoid the inconvenience of signing numerous checks.


“This stamp would be kept under lock and key and used only by Finance staff to sign checks,” Phillipe’s report said, noting that it is “a fairly standard procedure in many cities.”


In redevelopment-related business, Phillipe will ask the council to appoint a council member and a redevelopment agency staffer to the Clearlake Redevelopment Agency’s seven-member successor agency board.


The council voted at its Jan. 12 meeting to act as successor agency following the California Supreme Court’s decision last month that has cleared the way for the dismantling of redevelopment agencies statewide.


Phillipe’s report said the successor agency must be in place by May 12.


The council also will weigh the risks and benefits of assuming the redevelopment agency’s housing obligations.


If the city does not elect to take on those obligations, they would go to a local housing authority or, in the absence of such a body, the California Department of Housing and Community Development, according to a report from City Attorney Malathy Subramanian.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Google+, on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – The Lake County Board of Supervisors is seeking applicants to fill vacancies or seek reappointments on a number of advisory boards.


Positions on the following boards are available.


– Animal Control Advisory Board: Two vacancies, Supervisorial District 2 and Member-at-large categories.


– Area 1 Developmental Disabilities Board: Two vacancies, two persons with disabilities or the parents or guardians of such individuals.


– Big Valley Groundwater Management Zone Commission: Three vacancies, one ember at large, two in water districts category.


– Building Board of Appeals: Two vacancies, Supervisorial Districts 1 and 2.


– Child Care Planning and Development Council: Two vacancies, one in community representative and one in childcare provider.


– Clear Lake Advisory Committee: Four vacancies, one in wildlife, one in water quality, one in fishery and one in aquatic plants categories.


– Emergency Medical Care Committee: Seven vacancies, one in the community college district, one emergency room affiliated medical care coordinator, one paramedic representative, two emergency medical technician representatives, one private ambulance company and one in the consumers-interested group category.


– Fish and Wildlife Advisory Committee: One vacancy in the wildlife/conservation industry.


– Heritage commission: Two vacancies, Supervisorial Districts 2 and 5.


– In-Home Supportive Services Advisory Committee: Four vacancies, two in the senior consumer category, one in senior community and one in disabled consumer categories.


– Mental Health Advisory Board: Two vacancies, one in consumer and one in general membership categories.


– Section 8 Resident Advisory Board: Two vacancies, general membership.


– North Bay Cooperative Library Advisory Board: One vacancy, general membership.


Other advisory board seats may currently be vacant. For a comprehensive list, please see the posted roster outside the Clerk of the Board Office.


For applications, or if you have questions regarding a vacancy on one of these advisory boards, please contact the Clerk of the Board’s Office at 707-263-2371. Applications are also available online at www.lakecountyca.gov, or at the Lake County Courthouse, Clerk of the Board’s Office, Room 109, 255 North Forbes St., Lakeport, or can be downloaded below.


Memberships on all of the advisory boards listed above are voluntary.


Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Google+, on Facebook at www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .




Lake County Advisory Board Application

LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Lakeport City Council will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, Jan. 24.


The meeting will begin at 5 p.m. in the council chambers at Lakeport City Hall, 225 Park St.


The council will consider the adoption of a resolution amending the Lakeport Redevelopment Agency's Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule in compliance with AB 1X 26.


Council members will then adjourn into a closed session to discuss negotiations with employee groups including Lakeport Employees Association, Lakeport Police Officers Association and unrepresented employees.

LCNews

Award winning journalism on the shores of Clear Lake. 

 

Search