Local Government

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING


CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2011-153 AMENDING SECTION 11-3 AND REPEALING SECTION 11-4 OF CHAPTER 11, SANITATION, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CLEARLAKE, RELATING TO SOLID WASTE COLLECTION


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Clearlake City Council will conduct a public hearing on Thursday, October 13, 2011, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 14050 Olympic Drive, Clearlake, California at 6:00 p.m. or soon thereafter.


The purpose of the hearing is for the City Council to hear public testimony to determine whether to adopt Ordinance No. 2011-153, which amends Section 11-3 and repeals Section 11-4 of Chapter 11, Sanitation, of the Municipal Code of the City of Clearlake relating to solid waste collection.


In connection with the recent award of a solid waste franchise, the City has undertaken a review of the existing solid waste ordinance to ensure that the ordinance is consistent with the new franchise agreement and reflects current best practices regarding the collection and disposal of solid waste.


This review of the City’s ordinance revealed that certain updates and amendments are necessary to ensure consistency between the City’s new solid waste franchise agreement and the ordinance, and to reflect current best practices regarding solid waste.


To ensure the updates set forth in this ordinance are applicable for the entire term of the new solid waste franchise agreement, the City Council has provided for this ordinance to have retroactive effect to September 1, 2011.


The public or any affected parties may review the Staff Reports and other relevant documents prior to the hearing at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive during business hours.


Members of the public may submit written comments on the matter to the City Council prior to the hearing and/or may appear at the public hearing and speak on the matter.


Appeal of the City Council’s decision is limited to the consideration of those issues addressed by the City Council at the Public Hearing.


City Hall Council Chambers are handicap accessible. For further information contact Melissa Swanson, at 707-994-8201 extension 106.

CLEARLAKE, Calif. – On Thursday the Clearlake City Council will return to the matter of selecting an interim city administrator, and will discuss a resolution supporting a statewide emergency relating to invasive mussels as well as an ordinance to allow dogs in city park.


The council will meet in closed session beginning at 5:15 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 22, in the council chambers at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive, to discuss appointing an interim city administrator before convening in open session at 6 p.m.


The city has not yet identified the individual it is considering for the position, which currently is being held temporarily by Bob Galusha, also the city's engineer.


The council has worked through the summer to find and agree upon a candidate, after its initial selection was offered the job but later backed out in June, as Lake County News has reported.


If the council agrees on the candidate they will consider the final contract in open session at Thursday's meeting, according to City Clerk Melissa Swanson.


In other business, the council will consider adopting a resolution requesting that Gov. Jerry Brown declare a statewide emergency because of invasive Dreissenid mussels – specifically, quagga and zebra mussels – which have infested some Southern California water bodies.


The proposed resolution follows similar actions taken recently by the Board of Supervisors and the Lakeport City Council.


The council also will discuss a proposed ordinance to change city rules to allow dogs in parks, consider a response to the Lake County Grand Jury and hear a presentation by Clearlake Police Chief Craig Clausen.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.




092211 Clearlake City Council - Dreissenid Mussels Declaration




092211 Clearlake City Council - Grand Jury Response




092211 Clearlake City Council - Dog Park Ordinance

LAKEPORT, Calif. – Faced with redevelopment funding challenges, the Lakeport City Council on Tuesday decided to scale back some of the city's plans for the Lakeport Downtown Improvement Project.


The $5 million project, now in its second phase, is upgrading streets, sidewalks and intersections around the downtown, based on a plan that has been in development for several years and has been the subject of significant public input.


In a special hour-long workshop that preceded the regular council meeting Tuesday evening, Redevelopment and Community Development Director Richard Knoll laid out several options for the council.


The three-option menu before the council included terminating the project altogether, reducing the project's scope to save money – which was staff's preferred option – or simply moving forward.


Knoll said the city didn't have anywhere near the $3.5 million needed to complete the project as designed.


Rather, as a result of actions taken by the governor and state Legislature during the summer to eliminate redevelopment, the cumulative effect of several years of educational revenue augmentation funds payments – or ERAF – that the city had to make to the state, flat redevelopment revenues and city budget adjustments, Knoll said the city only has about $1.8 million to devote to the project.


In explaining the options, Knoll told the council that the project could be stopped altogether and the money that the redevelopment agency still had available to it could be put toward other projects, such as a new road to be built for a planned new courthouse on Lakeport Boulevard.


The staff-preferred second option recommended reducing the project's overall scope, eliminating bulbouts and raised “table” intersections – which is a traffic calming approach – along with associated landscaping, drainage improvements and a small wall, Knoll said.


The third and final option presented to the council Tuesday was to make no changes and stick with the project, Knoll said.


The project's engineer, Rau and Associates, prepared cost estimates for the proposed changes in option two. Knoll said that by eliminating the bulbouts, raised intersections and landscaping, the city could save between 12 and 17 percent of the project cost.


No actual bottom line number for the projected savings was given; Knoll said the actual savings would be determined based on the final bid and construction estimates.


Another motivation for city staff to get direction from the council involved the Savings Bank of Mendocino project, now under construction on Main Street.


Knoll said the bank has an obligation to build right-of-way improvements, and the redevelopment agency has been in negotiations with the bank to help participate in the funding.


But agency participation – which has been used in other projects – can't even be considered currently, Knoll said. That's due to a lawsuit against the state over the new redevelopment laws the Legislature approved as part of the 2011-12 budget.


Knoll said staff wanted direction on the changes to the downtown improvement plan so they could coordinate with the bank and make sure that the right-of-way improvements rise to the standard of the rest of the downtown design plan.


In response to questions from community members, Knoll said the downtown improvement project's second phase would hopefully occur on a “shoulder” season – meaning not the main tourist season that helps fuel the county economy. But he added that the timing has not yet been defined.


He said the city intends to work with the business community to address its concerns and avoid disruption. Knoll said the formation of a stakeholder committee is being discussed.


Mayor Suzanne Lyons asked if the city would have to pay for more plans. It was noted during the discussion that the city already has paid more than $400,000 for design. Knoll said some changes would have to be made, but that the plans were designed in such a way that they could be modified.


City Engineer Scott Harter said the city stopped the design work at about the 70-percent mark.


With council members Bob Rumfelt and Roy Parmentier absent for the discussion, the final vote was 2-1 – with Lyons voting no – to modify the project based on staff's recommended option No. 2.


While that option will do away with bulbouts, a small monument wall and some other associated improvements, it includes direction to concentrate the project along Main Street, where improvements will include widening sidewalks, planting trees with grates, moving the street lights out closer to the street – which Knoll said the council had previously approved – installing patterned concrete at intersections and crosswalks, and street reconstruction.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.




092011 Lakeport City Council - Downtown Improvement Workshop

LAKEPORT, Calif. – At the urging of the county's sheriff and community development director, the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved an ordinance to govern the cultivation of medical marijuana.


Just a month after it voted to approve a dispensaries ordinance that is now the target of a referendum, the board voted 5-0 on an ordinance that Community Development Director Rick Coel and Sheriff Frank Rivero said they had worked long and hard on to address a variety of land use and legal issues.


The ordinance will return to the board for its final reading on Oct. 4.


The document – as proposed by Coel, who worked closely with Rivero to craft it – allows each qualified patient a maximum of six mature or 12 immature plants, with three patients able to grow up to 18 mature or 36 immature plants on properties of one acre or larger, and still larger grows allowed on properties five acres or larger with a minor user permit.


The supervisors amended the document in several key ways on Tuesday.


For one, the medical marijuana cultivation permit for growers in cooperative or collective situations on five acres or more, with no more than 36 mature or 72 immature plants, will have legal noticing requirements that follow the county's grading ordinance.


Coel said that will require that property owners 300 feet from the property line will be notified by direct mail. No legal notice will be published in the newspaper, a measure meant to protect growers from potential thefts.


The board also decided to ban all outdoor grows on parcels less than a half-acre in size.


Indoor grows would remain limited to 100 square feet, but a condition to limit lighting to 1,200 watts was removed and replaced with language that requires lighting be up to code. The supervisors also removed a requirement to maintain kitchens, bathrooms and master bedrooms for their original uses.


The discussion, which ran for several hours, included input from Mendocino County Sheriff's Sgt. Randy Johnson, who discussed Mendocino County's program for handling grows – which includes four annual inspections in the first year and paid zip ties to help track plants – as well as substantial public comment from people who are both for and against medical marijuana cultivation.


The board heard from marijuana advocates like Ed Robey, former District 1 supervisor, who didn't want a minor use permit process used because of possible disclosure of grow locations, which could lead to crime.


On the other end of the spectrum was Spring Valley resident Paula Vess, who showed pictures of massive grows surrounding her property.


This is not medical marijuana. It is obvious. You don't have to be a rocket scientist. You just don't,” she said.


She held up another picture of Clear Lake. “That's what Lake County's all about.”


Following public comment, Supervisor Denise Rushing asked Coel if he had heard anything that would substantially change the document he had presented to the board.


Coel said no. “We have spent two years looking at this,” he said.


At the hearings on medical marijuana-related issues, the county has seen 100 or fewer people. Coel said the board needed to remember the other 45,000 people who live inside the county's jurisdiction, who weren't there to advocate and weren't asking for the doors to growing marijuana be thrown wide open.


“Please consider that. This is a major issue for this county,” said Coel. “Sheriff Rivero and I continually get complaints from people who are not here.”


Rivero urged the board not to “prolong the agony here any longer,” explaining that property owners were being prevented from enjoying their property and criminal activities were taking place.


“I have nothing in my toolbelt at this point in time to deal with it,” he said.


Rivero also didn't want to hand the work of monitoring compliance off to third-party inspectors, as is done in Mendocino County. He said that was his agency's responsibility.


Rivero said he and Coel have worked since January to address the issue, and both emphasized the need to use a land use ordinance to mitigate impacts, support the rights of neighbors and create a defensible document.


“A land use ordinance is a protection for the bigger picture,” said Rivero.


Later in the discussion Rivero noted that Vess, who is surrounded by three 1,000-plant grows, “should not be subjected to that.”


During board discussion, Rushing said she wanted a minor user permit process with zip ties like Mendocino had, and she didn't want to see information about plants and locations published. Coel suggested the compromise to allow immediate neighbors to comment such as is done with the grading ordinance. But he emphasized a need to let neighbors weigh in on potential grows.


Supervisor Jeff Smith didn't want outdoor grows in residential areas – he preferred they be inside only – while Supervisor Anthony Farrington supported outdoor grows in neighborhoods.


Rushing asked Rivero about going to a 99 plant limit on 10 acres or more. Rivero said he didn't agree with the 99-plant limit on 10 acres or 100 acres, and he felt the numbers within the proposed ordinance were “perfectly reasonable.”


Nor did he want to pursue a zip tie program due to concerns about his department taking drug-related money.


Supervisor Rob Brown said the topic had been beaten to death, but added that it wasn't a difficult decision.


He said he agreed with the sheriff on the need for the ordinance, and didn't agree with Mendocino County's approach.


Brown related a story about taking a number of young people home following a gymkhana last Friday. One 10-year-old girl asked him to go with her as she unloaded and put away her horse. He said that her home was near a grow, and after a few minutes helping the girl he said lights came on and he heard someone racking a shell into a shotgun on the grow property.


“These people can go to Mendocino County. They could go there. I won't miss 'em one bit,” he said, adding, “If they want to grow like that in that kind of environment they can go somewhere else. I'm not here to cater to them.”


He said he's had foster children in his home who have described their parents beating them for failing to stay awake all night to help watch their drug grows.


“I'm here to advocate for those people who don't want it,” he said.


Brown said pot has been grown around Lake County for years, and it wasn't an issue until people wanted to bring it to town.


“If you want to make a living selling marijuana, you too can go to Mendocino County,” he said.


Brown then offered the ordinance, to which the board made the final adjustments before taking the vote.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.




082311 Board of Supervisors - Draft Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – A man died late Monday night when he allegedly was attempting to steal marijuana from a south county grow.


Sheriff Frank Rivero reported the late night incident during a Tuesday Board of Supervisors' discussion involving the medical marijuana cultivation ordinance.


Rivero said he was awakened at about midnight Tuesday morning by sheriff's staff, who reported that a male subject had fallen off a ravine while stealing from a grow on Big Canyon Road near Middletown.


“We found him this morning,” said Rivero. “He was dead.”


Deputies were reportedly on the scene of the grow most of Tuesday, investigating the incident.


Rivero did not name the man who died from the fall, and no further details were available on Tuesday.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.

LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Board of Supervisors will continue discussion on a proposed ordinance to govern cultivation of medical marijuana when it meets this week.


The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Sept. 20, in the board chambers on the first floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes St., Lakeport. TV8 will broadcast the meeting live.


The discussion on the proposed ordinance will begin at 1:30 p.m.


The proposed ordinance would amend Chapter 21 of the Ordinance Code of the county of Lake adding Article 72A: Regulations for the Cultivation of Medical Marijuana (AM 11-03).


The board previously held a lengthy discussion on the topic last month.


The board also will hold a closed session to discuss labor negotiations with the Lake County Employees Association, Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association, Lake County Correctional Officer's Association and Lake County Deputy District Attorney's Association; and hold conference with legal counsel regarding Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'s application for approval of modifications to its SmartMeter Program and increased revenue requirements to recover the costs of the modifications.


A full agenda follows.


TIMED ITEMS


9 a.m.: Approval of consent agenda, which includes items that are expected to be routine and noncontroversial, and will be acted upon by the board at one time without discussion; presentation of animals available for adoption at Lake County Animal Care and Control; consideration of items not appearing on the posted agenda, and contract change orders for current construction projects.

9:05 a.m.: Citizen's input. Any person may speak for three minutes about any subject of concern, provided that it is within the jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors and is not already on the agenda. Prior to this time, speakers must fill out a slip giving name, address and subject (available in the clerk of the board’s office, first floor, courthouse).


9:15 a.m.: Presentation of the Library Advisory Board Annual Report


9:30 a.m.: Hearing, nuisance abatement of 7298, 7290, 7282 and 7274 E. Butte St., Upper Lake, CA (APN 031-132-26, 27, 28 & 29 - Sean J. Silvestro).


9:45 a.m.: Hearing, nuisance abatement of 12595 Highway 175, Loch Lomond, CA (APN 011-067-10 - Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.).


10 a.m.: Public hearing, continued from Aug. 23: Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s partial denial of a modified version of the following project: GPAP 11-01, RZ 11-01 and MMU 10-06 proposing a general plan amendment of 0.8 acres from Service Commercial to Community Commercial and 4.2 acres from Agriculture to Service Commercial; a rezone from “C3" Service Commercial to “CH” Highway Commercial and “A” Agriculture to “C3" Service Commercial; and a Minor Modification to existing permits (Res. 69-83, UP 88-42 and MUP 09-23) to allow a conveniene store and construction of a 30,000 gallon propane tank; appellant is Westgate Petroleum; project located at 3740 Highland Springs Road, Lakeport (APN 008-002-31).


10:30 a.m.: Presentation of certificates of appreciation to Gregory and Marianne Graham and Clay and Margarita Shannon for their support of Konocti Regional Trails.


10:40 a.m.: Consideration of request for board direction regarding the enforcement of Williamson Act Contract compliance for Grazing Land.


10:50 a.m.: Consideration of the proposed Lake County Realignment Implementation Plan and request to designate BI Incorporated as a sole provider; and consideration of proposed agreements between

the county of Lake and BI Incorporated for the operation of a Day Reporting Center and the (Jail Education and Employment) JEEP Program.


11 a.m.: Consideration of request for board support of application for establishment of two new Viticultural Areas in Lake County (Big Valley and Kelsey Bench).


1:30 a.m.: Public hearing, continued from Aug. 23. Discussion/consideration of proposed ordinance

amending Chapter 21 of the Ordinance Code of the county of Lake adding Article 72A: Regulations for the Cultivation of Medical Marijuana (AM 11-03).


NONTIMED ITEMS


– Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports.


– Consideration of proposed Findings of Fact in the Appeal of La Monica Signs (AB 11-03).


– Consideration of proposed ordinance amending Article II of Chapter 2 of the Lake County Code establishing the boundaries of the Supervisorial Districts for the County of Lake pursuant to Sections

21500 et seq. of the Elections Code. Second reading, advanced from Sept. 13.


– Waive the formal bidding process and make a determination that competitive bidding would produce no economic benefit to the county; and consideration of proposed agreement between the county of Lake and Stantec Consulting Services, for No Further Action Report and Well Decommissioning services for the Central Garage Maintenance Yard, for an amount not to exceed $28,965.


– Consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Lucerne Alpine Seniors Inc. for health-related senior support services in the amount of $4,400; and consideration of proposed

contract between the county of Lake and Middletown Senior Citizens Inc. for health-related senior support services in the amount of $4,400; and consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Highlands Senior Service Center Inc., for health-related senior support services in the amount of $10,050; and consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Live Oak Senior Center for health-related senior support services in the amount of $6,211; and consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Lakeport Senior Center Inc. for health-related senior support services in the amount of $8,125; and consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Kelseyville Seniors Inc. to provide basic operating expenses in the amount of $2,000; and consideration of proposed contract between the county of Lake and Senior Support Services to provide

basic operating expenses in the amount of $1,000.


– Consideration of proposed resolution rescinding Resolution 2004-04 abolishing the In-Home Supportive Services Advisory Committee; and consideration of appointments to advisory committee if not abolished.


– Consideration of proposed ordinance amending the charges and fees for County Service Area No. 20 - Soda Bay. Second reading, advanced from Sept. 13.


CONSENT AGENDA


– Approve minutes of the Board of Supervisors meetings held on Aug. 17 and Sept. 13, 2011.


– Adopt certificates of appreciation to Gregory and Marianne Graham and Clay and Margarita Shannon for their support of Konocti Regional Trails.


– Adopt Resolution in support of declaring Sundays as Eat Local, Buy California Grown Day.


– Adopt resolution approving Public Health’s Application to the California Department of Public Health for the Community Nutrition Expansion Project for federal fiscal year 2011-12.


– Adopt resolution approving the 2011-2012 CDC Public Health Emergency Preparedness, State General Fund Pandemic Influenza and HHS Hospital Preparedness Program and authorize the chair to sign a nonsupplantation certification.


– Approve agreement between the county of Lake and North Valley Behavioral Health for psychiatric health facility support services provided during fiscal year 2008-09, in the amount of $23,400, and

authorize the chair to sign.


– Approve first amendment to agreement between the county of Lake and California Judicial Investigations for investigative services, an increase of $5,974.31, and authorize the chair to sign.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.




082311 Board of Supervisors - Draft Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ordinance

LCNews

Award winning journalism on the shores of Clear Lake. 

 

Search