Local Government

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF LAKE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

 


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors, County of Lake, State of California, has set TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011, at 11:30 A.M., Board Chambers, Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, as time and place to consider A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 706A OF THE SEWER USE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO SEWER SYSTEM CAPACITY FEES FOR CONNECTIONS TO THE NORTHWEST REGIONAL WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM.


NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said place and time, any interested persons may appear and be heard.


If you challenge the action of the Board of Supervisors on any of the above stated items in court, it may be limited to only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Clerk to the Board at, or prior to, the public hearing.



KELLY F. COX

Clerk of the Board


By: Mireya G. Turner

Assistant Clerk to the Board

LAKEPORT, Calif. – Following an hour-and-a-half-long budget workshop on Tuesday, the Lakeport City Council voiced its approval of the city's preliminary budget for 2011-12 and appears set to approve it later this month.


The workshop, held before the council's regular meeting, considered a 142-page document compiled by City Manager Margaret Silveira, interim Finance Manager Dan Buffalo, department heads and staff.


Silveira said the budget is a team effort.


In these tougher financial times, it wasn't a budget prepared without some pain. Sitting with Silveira in her office, working out the specifics with the department heads, “We laughed, we cried,” Buffalo said.


The budget estimates revenues for the 2011-12 fiscal year at $14,367,399, with expenditures at $17,008,108.


The difference, approximately $2,640,709, are largely for capital projects that staff suggested would be prudent to pursue. Covering that amount will be city reserves and a small surplus from this budget year that's the result of deferred capital projects and department heads controlling costs, staff said.


Buffalo noted that the recommended budget is close to being balanced except for the fund reserves that will be used.


City staff worked to maintain current levels of city service and existing personnel, the latter being part of better serving the community's needs, they explained to the council.


Buffalo explained that, in years past, the city's budget was presented “in a bubble,” and only looked at one year at a time, rather than looking farther ahead to consider the implications.


“We attempted to do a very basic projection two years out, across all departments,” he said.


The budget also focuses on city priorities, meshing council and staff goals with available resources, while maintaining accountability, transparency and clarity, Buffalo said.


Silveira explained that the staff proposed going forward with capital improvement projects such as road work, which reserves will cover.


“It's a balancing act to try to keep some of the capital improvement projects moving,” said Silveira.


Councilman Bob Rumfelt praised staff for creating what he believed was one of the easiest and simplest budget documents he's seen in more than a decade on the council. “I appreciate all of the work that you did to simplify it and make it so clear.”


As illustrated in a series of charts Buffalo created, the proposed 2011-12 budget has revenues at about the same level as the 2010-11 fiscal year, with slightly higher expenditures. Both revenues and expenditures are down from 2009-10.


The city's largest revenue stream is taxes, at 68.1 percent, followed by charges for service, 11.7 percent; intergovernmental, 7.4 percent; other, 6.8 percent; franchise fees, 3.4 percent; licenses and permits, 1.7 percent; fines, forfeitures and penalties, 0.6 percent; and use of money, 0.3 percent.


On the expenditures side, salaries account for the largest slice of the pie, 37 percent, followed by operations, 34 percent; benefits, 20 percent; capital projects, 7 percent; and debt service, 2 percent.


“So, with what you're proposing, we're going to be OK?” Councilman Tom Engstrom asked.


Silveira said she's comfortable with it. Even with using reserves, the city will have 50 percent in reserves left over, well above the minimum requirement of 15 percent.


She said staff also is proposing to annex South Main Street in the coming fiscal year, which will bring in new revenue.


There are no new staff positions being proposed, only the filling of empty spots, like one position in the city's water operations. “It's very bare bones,” Silveira said.


Rumfelt said staff has done a very good job of keeping costs down. “And they just haven't gotten the credit for it, and it's a shame.”


Kelly Buendia, the city's human resources/administrative services director, said with the proposed 2011-12 budget city staff members feel that they are proposing very minimum staffing levels.


Three years ago the council put a hiring freeze in place, and she asked if council members were amenable to having her bring back a formal proposal to lift the freeze.


The purpose, Buendia explained, would not be to begin adding back staff positions. Rather, it would be to simplify the hiring process when a budgeted position is vacated.


She said it's become increasingly difficult to deal with vacancies because of the hiring freeze, which requires staff to go to the council and receive approval just to hire for a current position.


Typically, hiring freezes are for a short period of time. Buendia said three years is a long time for a freeze.


The council agreed that Buendia could bring the proposal back for a future meeting.


Buffalo told the council that the only staff positions in the budget are those which are funded.


Engstrom said he wanted to make sure that the city takes care of its current staff before hiring more.


He thanked all of the staff for doing more with less. Engstrom pointed out that the police department's proposed budget – at $1.7 million – is $350,000 less than it was when he retired from the city's police chief job in 2005.


Silveira told the council members she will bring the final budget back to them for approval on Tuesday, June 21.


During the meeting Mayor Suzanne Lyons asked about an update of the city's mission statement. Agreeing that the current statement is outdated, Silveira said staff will have a goal of bringing back a new city mission statement to the council by the middle of the new fiscal year.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .



060711 Lakeport City Council - Budget Workshop

CLEARLAKE, Calif. – Adoption of the budgets for the city and the redevelopment agency, as well as a proposed property purchase will be on the Clearlake City Council's Thursday agenda.


The council will meet in the council chambers onThursday, June 9, at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive.


At 5 p.m. the council will convene for a closed session to hold an evaluation of interim Finance Director Michael Vivrette and discuss property negotiations for 14927 Austin Road.


The open session will convene at 6 p.m.


Interim City Administrator Steve Albright, whose last day on the job is Friday, will present to the council proposed budgets for the city and redevelopment agency.


The budgets are balanced, include funds to cover deferred maintenance projects and new vehicles for animal control, Public Works and the Clearlake Police Department, and a proposal for the first cost of living increase in four years, according to Albright.


He told Lake County News last week that the documents are ready to be accepted and he's prepared budget resolutions for the council to approve.


The city has a deadline of June 30 mandated by the state constitution for accepting the coming fiscal year's budget, Albright said.


He'll also take to the council a proposed bid award for city hall roof repairs. The total project is to cost $94,000. The city received an American Reinvestment and Recovery Act grant to replace the leaking roof with a highly energy efficient roof, according to Albright's report to the staff. A $25,000 match was required, which is covered as one of the proposed budget's deferred maintenance projects.


The council also will discuss the redevelopment agency's proposed purchase of 14295 Lakeshore Drive for $207,199 plus closing costs.


The substandard property located adjacent to Highland Park currently is in foreclosure and valued at $667,250. Albright's report to the council proposes that the property be purchased and used as a visitor center. The county has allocated funds for renovating and improving the project, he said.


Albright is soon to be succeeded by Tully Clifford, whose hiring as the new full-time city administrator was approved by the council last week, as Lake County News has reported.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF LAKE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING and

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE

 


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors, County of Lake, State of California, has set TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011, at 1:30 P.M., Board Chambers, Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, as time and place to consider A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE LAKE COUNTY CODE TO ADD ARTICLE 72, “REGULATIONS FOR THE DISPENSING OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA”.


If adopted as proposed, this ordinance will establish regulations, standards and circumstances for a limited number of collective or cooperative medical marijuana dispensaries to operate in the unincorporated area of the County of Lake. At the discretion of the Board of Supervisors, during the public hearing, any part of this proposed Ordinance may be amended and/or omitted from the final approved version. A certified copy of the proposed Ordinance is available at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Room 109, Lakeport, CA.


NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place any interested person may appear and be heard.



KELLY F. COX

Clerk of the Board


By: Mireya G. Turner

Assistant Clerk to the Board

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

COUNTY OF LAKE

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING and

SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE

 


NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors, County of Lake, State of California, has set TUESDAY, JUNE 21, 2011, at 11:00 A.M., Board Chambers, Courthouse, Lakeport, as time and place to consider A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADDING ARTICLE XXVI TO CHAPTER 2 OF THE LAKE COUNTY CODE REGARDING ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE LEASING OR LICENSING OF COUNTY REAL PROPERTY.


If adopted as proposed, this ordinance will allow the County to enter into a lease or licensing contract (under $10,000/month and under 10 year lease, non-renewable) with an interested party instead of performing the formal bidding procedures. At the discretion of the Board of Supervisors, during the public hearing, any part of this proposed Ordinance may be amended and/or omitted from the final approved version. A certified copy of the proposed Ordinance is available at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Courthouse, 255 North Forbes Street, Room 109, Lakeport, CA.


NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that at said time and place any interested person may appear and be heard.



KELLY F. COX

Clerk of the Board


By: Mireya G. Turner

Assistant Clerk to the Board

LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Board of Supervisors voted unanimously Tuesday to hold a June 21 meeting on a proposed medical marijuana dispensaries ordinance in the board chambers at the Lake County Courthouse and not at the county jail.


As the result of a bomb threat phoned in to the courthouse on April 28 – shortly before the Lake County Planning Commission was to discuss the dispensaries ordinance – that meeting was rescheduled to May 11 at the Lake County Jail.


After people were allowed back into the courthouse on April 28 – following three hours of clearing the building – Planning Commission Chair Bob Malley called the meeting back to order and said Sheriff Frank Rivero had suggested that the meeting be continued to May 11 at the Alternative Work Program building next to the jail on Hill Road, according to meeting minutes.


The meeting did take place on May 11 at the jail. Rivero suggested to Community Development Director Rick Coel, County Administrative Officer Kelly Cox and Malley that the meeting be moved to the jail, according to Coel.


“Rivero made a good call,” Coel told Lake County News on Tuesday.


After that “strong recommendation” from Rivero to have that first meeting at the jail, Coel sent the sheriff an e-mail on May 26 to ask if the offer still stood for the purposes of the board meeting. Rivero indicated in his response that he was happy to help and would notify his jail lieutenant to cooperate with Coel on scheduling the meeting.


However, medical marijuana advocates have complained to the supervisors that holding the meeting at the jail is disrespectful and has a chilling effect on public input.


The board on Tuesday appeared to agree. Additionally, they made clear that they didn't want to be held hostage to threats.


Cox told the board that having the courthouse closed for several hours on April 28 while the bomb threat was cleared was expensive.


“The cost of the county itself was in excess of $10,000,” said Cox, a calculation that covered the amount of lost staff work time. That amount didn't include the cost to the courts, which have separate budgets.


Cox said Rivero, who was not present for the Tuesday discussion, had suggested that the planning commission be moved to the jail, a recommendation that Cox thought was good and said he supported.


While there may end up being no threat this time, “It's a risk to take, and it's a costly risk,” said Cox.


He said there are other buildings in the community where the meeting could be held. Referring back to April 28, Cox said it was a “very disruptive day in county government,” with members of the public unable to access the courthouse for other business.


Supervisor Rob Brown said having the meeting at the jail could be even more disruptive if a threat is called in there.


Based on the county corrections policy, of copy of which he had with him at the meeting, a jail evacuation would require law enforcement from around the county to converge at the site to move inmates.


The disruption and cost incurred in such a circumstance could be far greater, and place the county at greater risk, he suggested.


“I don't think the jail is an option,” said Brown.


Regardless of a bomb threat, Brown said if the supervisors start worrying about where to hold meetings because of what might happen, they'll have a problem.


The building has been evacuated in the past for other reasons too, he said. “We've had this building evacuated because cookies were burning.”


He said he wanted to hold the board meeting in the board chambers and get a commitment from Rivero to bulk up security.


Lake County Chamber Chief Executive Officer Melissa Fulton said the jail may not be the appropriate place due to a perceived stigma.


Fulton said another threat could cost the county more money and disrupt county services.


“I think it's totally inconsiderate to inconvenience the general public,” she said.


Fulton suggested the meeting could be held at the Lake County Fairgrounds on Martin Street, adding she was certain Rivero could accommodate security measures there.


Brown, who pointed out that the superior court also has had threats before, said he refused to be held hostage to a random bomb scare, noting that any future threats could be over anything.


Supervisor Jeff Smith agreed. “I can see it just snowballing.”


He added, “We have a secure facility. I guess it was a good lesson learned that day.”


Smith said the board needed to take safety measures and be willing to stand up.


Coel said Tuesday that he believed the board made the right decision and, wherever the meeting was held, a law enforcement presence was necessary.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Tumblr at www.lakeconews.tumblr.com, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

LCNews

Award winning journalism on the shores of Clear Lake. 

 

Search