Local Government

LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Lakeport City Council will discuss taking action regarding SmartMeter installations in the city when it meets this week.


The council will meet at 6 p.m. Tuesday, April 5, in the council chambers at Lakeport City Hall, 225 Park St.


The full agenda and staff reports for the meeting can be downloaded at www.cityoflakeport.com/departments/docs.aspx?deptID=88&catID=102 .


City Utilities Director Mark Brannigan will ask the council for direction on how to address community members' concerns about Pacific Gas & Electric's new wireless SmartMeter devices.


Last month both Board of Supervisors approved an urgency ordinance imposing an installation ban, directed staff to research legal action to stop the meters being installed and sent a letter to state leaders in support of AB 37, which would require the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to offer consumers an opt-out alternative, as Lake County News has reported.


A few weeks later, the Clearlake City Council took the same essential actions, minus directing staff to sue, with Council member Judy Thein stating that all the county's local governments needed to stand together on the matter.


The Big Valley Rancheria Tribal Council also has reportedly banned the devices on its lands.


At its March 15 meeting, the Lakeport City Council directed Brannigan to agendize its own discussion on the matter.


Brannigan's report refers to PG&E's proposal, submitted at the CPUC's direction last month, to offer its own opt-out proposal. PG&E's plan would charge customers upfront and ongoing fees in order to service the devices.


Because the CPUC has exclusive jurisdiction over the regulation of public utilities, Brannigan noted in his report to the council, “legislative actions by the City of Lakeport to stop the installation of SmartMeters will likely be unenforceable, but there are actions that the City can take in support of citizen concerns.”


He's suggesting four options: issuing letters to legislators and governor in support of AB 37; passing a resolution declaring the council’s position pertaining to SmartMeters and related equipment and demanding a halt of the installation of SmartMeters for those customers who don't want the devices; imposing an ordinance instituting a moratorium on the installation of SmartMeters and related equipment in the city; or taking no action and monitoring AB 37.


Community Development and Redevelopment Director Richard Knoll also will give the council an update on the S. Main Street annexation.


Also on Tuesday's agenda, Supervisor Anthony Farrington and Quincy Engineering will give the council an update on the South Main Street Project, and new Lakeport Police Officer Joseph Eastham and new police volunteer Greg Scott will be introduced to the council.


Under redevelopment agency business, the council – sitting as redevelopment agency board members – will consider approving owner participation agreements with Thomas and Lorie Nieto for façade improvements at 125-127 N. Main St. and with Bob and Toni Funderburg of RA Funderburg Inc. for façade improvements at Lakeport Tire and Auto, 1901 S. Main St., and will get a report regarding the status of redevelopment.


The council will consider authorizing City Manager Margaret Silveira enter into a contract with the firm HDR for a water and sewer rate study, and Public Works Director Doug Grider will take to them an application for the Lake County Farmers’ Finest Farmers Market to be held on Wednesdays from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. from June 1 through Sept. 28, with staff recommended modifications.


Other items on the agenda include a proposed resolution restricting parking on a portion of 15th Street, the results from the consultant selection board on the Parallel Drive Water Main Extension Project and providing direction to staff regarding contract negotiations, a budget amendment, and a proposed resolution and agreement with the Franchise Tax Board to participate in the City Business Tax (CBT) Program.


The council will hold a closed session to discuss labor negotiations with the Lakeport Employees Association and conduct a performance evaluation of Silveira.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .


UPPER LAKE, Calif. – Lake County's Assembly member said Friday he is authoring a bill to ratify the recently signed gaming compact between the Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake and Gov. Jerry Brown.


Assemblyman Wes Chesbro (D-Arcata) said he has authored AB 1020 to ratify the compact in the Legislature.


“I will be amending the bill next week to make it an urgency bill so that once it is ratified the compact can go into effect immediately after it is approved by the Legislature and the tribe can immediately begin construction,” Chesbro said in a statement released by his office Friday.


According to a previous interview with Tribal Chair Sherry Treppa, the Legislature's ratification is the next step that's needed before the compact goes to the US Department of Interior for final approval.


Brown signed the compact – the first of his administration – on March 17, state officials reported.


The 33,000 square foot sprung structure casino will be built outside of Upper Lake on an 11.24-acre parcel next to the county park on Highway 20, and will include 349 machines and a number of amenities, including restaurants, a cocktail lounge and retail shops, as Lake County News has reported.


Chesbro said the tribe's compact is “extremely important,” since it's estimated that the casino will create 145 new jobs for Lake County, which had a February unemployment rate of 19.2 percent, according to the state Employment Development Department.


He said the tribe “has done everything right” in its approach to the casino project.


In particular, he credited Habematolel for working with the Board of Supervisors to address concerns about the casino, entering into a fire and emergency services agreement with the Northshore Fire Protection District and working with Caltrans to complete safety improvements along Highway 20.


Chesbro also lauded the tribe's decision to set aside more than 55 acres of land to assist the county with Middle Creek Restoration Project protection.


Treppa, who leads the 216-member tribe, has credited Chesbro and his staff for their support of the casino effort.


Chesbro also had authored previous legislation to support a 2009 compact the tribe signed with then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.


The Department of Interior denied approval of that compact last summer after it found the document violated the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.


If all approvals move forward in a timely manner, Treppa has estimated that the tribe could break ground on the project in late spring.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – Action by the state will allow the county to move forward with efforts to purchase homes located in the Middle Creek Restoration Project area that were endangered by a levee breech earlier this month.


The California Department of Water Resources has released $7 million for use in purchasing property in the project area – located between Nice and Upper Lake – including an estimated eight to nine residences, according to state and local officials.


The 1,400-acre project area is slated to be returned to wetland to address Clear Lake's nutrient loading and to remove residents from harm's way due to aging levees.


On March 14 a levee in the area began to leak large amounts of water. The leak was in the form of an underground channel that developed alongside large pipes than ran from a nearby pump station through the levee and into Clear Lake, as Lake County News has reported.


The situation was so serious that county Water Resources Director Scott De Leon told the Board of Supervisors the following day that they had been within a half-hour of having the levee fail completely had they not taken quick action to begin measures to stop the breech.


In the wake of the incident, county officials raised the issue about a freeze on state funds that was preventing them from moving forward with buying the lands in the project area.


Assemblyman Wes Chesbro, who had authored AB 74 in 2009 to create the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction Project, and his staff then became involved with trying to find out what happened to the funds.


Chesbro's Lake County field representative, Ruth Valenzuela, appearing at the March 15 board meeting to assure the supervisors they were researching what had occurred.


By last week they had their answer, with Chesbro's office reporting that the state Department of Water Resources responded quickly and the $7 million will be freed up after the Lake County Board of Supervisors approves a grant amendment, which is on the agenda for Tuesday, April 5.


De Leon's memo to the Board of Supervisors for the April 5 meeting said that, in addition to providing an additional $7 million, the amendment will extend the county's contract with the state for the project until Aug. 28, 2014.


“It's amazing what a hole in the levee will do,” said Water Resources Engineer Tom Smythe, who was on the scene of the levee break and worked throughout the day in the soggy, cold conditions.


By the end of the week of the levee break, he said the county had an amendment to their old agreement, which will allow them to move forward.


A longtime county employee, Smythe has watched the restoration project since it was conceptualized around 1989. The county started working on the project with the US Army Corps of Engineers in 1995.


“The light at the end of the tunnel is getting a little bit brighter,” he said.


The property the county owns in the project area totals about 140 acres, Smythe said.


De Leon's memo to the Board of Supervisors explains that the Lake County Watershed Protection District applied for a Flood Protection Corridor Program grant to begin property acquisitions for the Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project in 2003.


He said the application was selected for funding and an agreement funding property acquisition was signed on May 14, 2004, for $5.214 million. That agreement was amended on Dec. 28, 2006, which both extended the contract time to August 2009 and increased the award by $500,000.


De Leon said the funding was used to purchase seven residential properties from willing sellers.


The buildings on those properties were subsequently demolished. De Leon said these properties are now protected from future development with a conservation easement the state Department of Fish and Game holds.


De Leon said the funding freeze occurred in December 2008, halting the expenditure of $1 million to make property purchases. It wasn't until after the August 2009 expiration date that the funds were unfrozen.


While the state grant funds were frozen, district funds were used to purchase and demolish one residence that had gone into foreclosure, he said.


Referring to the additional $7 million the state is providing, De Leon said in his memo, “With these funds we should be able to acquire all the remaining flood prone residential structures, agricultural land and hydraulic mitigation of Trust land on the Robinson Rancheria.”


Once the board approves the agreement, Smythe said it will be sent back to the director of the state Department of Water Resources for his signature. “Then we actually have an executed agreement to spend money.”


Smythe said he's drafted a letter requesting willing sellers that will be sent out soon.


Project has funding priorities


Under the original 2004 grant, the county's first purchase priority is for eight to nine residential structures that are subject to flooding if the levees break, Smythe said.


The second priority is mitigation on trust lands that are held for Robinson Rancheria.


He said there needs to be an agreement reached with Robinson Rancheria with regard to some of those trust lands that could be affected, but Smythe noted that discussions on that point died years ago.


The issue was that the tribe wanted to swap trust status on lands that would go underwater because of the project with other tribal-owned land, but federal officials weren't open to the proposal, as Lake County News has reported.


Smythe said the project could impact tribally owned properties between the Rodman Slough and the tribe's new gas station on Highway 20, a property across the highway from the casino and the casino's parking lot.


“We tried reopening discussions probably about a year and a half ago and did not make much progress,” he said, noting it wasn't for lack of effort on either the part of the tribe or the county.


If the levee broke today and flooded the area, more than half of Robinson Rancheria's parking lot would be under water, Smythe said. That hasn't been a threat until the recent levee breech.


“It was a lot too close,” said Smythe.


However, he said Supervisor Denise Rushing spoke with the tribal council about reopening discussions late last year after the county had raised its concerns about the tribe's new gas station project on Highway 20, not far from the damaged levee.


Tribal officials told the supervisors at a January meeting that they were willing to talk to the county about the project.


After those priorities are addressed, with any money left over the county would seek to purchase agricultural properties, moving from south to north. “Flood depths are greater the further south you go in the reclamation because you're getting closer to the lake,” Smythe said.


Smythe said some property sales stymied by unwilling sellers in the past have become possible due to foreclosures or the properties otherwise changing hands.


As well, some owners unwilling to consider selling in the past have changed their minds due to the conditions, he said.


That is the case with Marcia Rooney, who along with her husband Philip owns about 11 acres in the reclamation area. Their property is in line for purchase.


The Rooneys, who have seen previous levee breaks in the area, pitched in to assist with building a ring levee to help support the main levee on March 14.


Philip Rooney and son Matt, along with family friend Mike Riley, stood in freezing cold water up to their waists for hours as they put sandbags in place.


Marcia Rooney said, in the beginning, they didn't want to sell.


“We were going to fight it but it's not worth it any more,” she said.


Smythe said Lake County Water Resources wants to try to get the appraisal process on new property purchases started quickly.


“We're looking at trying to start the appraisal process this summer and get as many people out as we can before next winter,” he said.


While they have enough money to acquire all of the area's residential properties, Smythe said he couldn't estimate how much of the agriculture lands in the project area the county can acquire with its funds.


Moving forward with removing the levees and completing the project hinges on those purchases, he said.


“Until we are able to acquire all of the property, we really can't take it out, because then we'd be flooding peoples' property without paying for it,” which Smythe said would violate the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against government abusing its power in legal proceedings.


Chesbro thanked the the state Department of Water Water Resources “for recognizing the need to act quickly and the staff of the Lake County Water Resources Department for their fast action to mend the levee breech.”


He also thanked Valenzuela, who he said spent a great deal of time working with state Department of Water Resources staff to make the $7 million available to Lake County.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. – San Francisco VA Medical Center’s rural health coordinator and local veteran representatives will host two town hall meetings on Friday, April 1, to discuss the needs of veterans living in rural Lake County.


The meetings will take place at 10 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, first floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes St. in Lakeport; and at 1:30 p.m. at the American Legion Post 437, 14770 Austin Road in Clearlake.


The VA Office of Rural Health reports that 40 percent of veterans receiving VA care live in rural or highly rural areas.


The VA is seeking input from veterans about what they believe are barriers to VA care and other issues that might help improve VA services.


Representatives from the United Veterans Council of Lake County and each veterans service organization in Lake County will attend.


Bob Penny from the Lake County Veterans Service Office will also be present.


For more information about this meeting please contact Rural Health Coordinator Kathy King at 707-569-2431.

 

 

Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews , on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews .

CITY OF CLEARLAKE


ORDINANCE NO. ORD-2011-149


AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARLAKE, CALIFORNIA IMPOSING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE INSTALLATION OF SMART METERS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, UNDER AND OVER THE PUBLIC STREETS AND OTHER PLACES WITHIN THE CITY



The City Council of the City of Clearlake does ordain as follows:


Authority

The City Council enacts this urgency ordinance under the authority granted to cities by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution and Section 36937 of the California Government Code.

Findings

  1. The City has a franchise agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric (“PG&E”) that has been in effect since 1981.

  2. The City retains authority under Article XII, Section 8 of the Constitution to grant franchises for public utilities and, pursuant to California Public Utilities Code Section 6002 “ . . . may in such a franchise impose such other and additional terms and conditions not in conflict with this chapter, whether governmental or contractual in character, as in the judgment of the legislative body are to the public interest”.

  3. The California Public Utilities Code Section 2902 reserves the City’s right to supervise and regulate public utilities in matters affecting the health, convenience and safety of the general public, “including matters such as the use and repair of public streets by any public utility, the location of the poles, wires, mains, or conduits of any public utility, on, under, or above any public streets, and the speed of common carriers operating within the limits of the municipal corporation”.

  4. PG&E is now installing Smart Meters in central and northern California and is installing these meters in the City of Clearlake.

  5. Concerns about the impact and accuracy of Smart Meters have been raised nationwide, leading the Maryland Public Service Commission to deny permission of June 21, 2010 for the deployment of Smart Meters in that state. The State of Hawaii Public Utility Commission also recently declined to adopt a smart grid system in that state. The California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) recently had before it a petition from the City and County of San Francisco and other municipalities seeking to delay the implementation of Smart Meters until questions about their accuracy can be evaluated.

  6. Major problems and deficiencies with Smart Meters in California have been brought to the attention of the City Council, including the significant concerns of many City residents as to the potential negative impacts to health and privacy. Additionally, this Council is aware of PG&E’s confirmation that Smart Meters have provided incorrect readings costing taxpayers untold thousands of dollars in overcharges and that PG&E’s records outlined “risks” and “issues” including an ongoing ability to recover real-time data because of faulty hardware from PG&E vendors.

  7. The ebb and flow of gas and electricity into homes discloses detailed information about the private details of daily life. Energy usage data, measured moment by moment, allows the reconstruction of a household’s activities: when people awake, when they come home, when they are on vacation, and even when they take a hot bath. Smart Meters represent a new form of technology that relays detailed hitherto confidential information reflecting the times and amounts of the use of electric power without adequately protecting that data from being accessed by unauthorized persons or entities and, as such, these meters pose an unreasonable intrusion of utility customers’ privacy rights and security interests. The fact the CPUC has not established safeguards for privacy in its regulatory approvals may violate the principles set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Kyllo v. United States (2001), 533 U.S. 27.

  8. There is now evidence showing that problems with Smart Meters could adversely impact the amateur radio communication network that operates throughout California and neighboring states, as well as other radio emergency communication systems that serve first responders, government agencies, and the public.

  9. Significant health questions have been raised concerning the increased electromagnetic frequency radiation (“EMF”) emitted by the wireless technology in Smart Meters, which will be in every house, apartment, and business, thereby adding more man-made EMF to our environment on a continuous basis.

  10. Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) safety standards do not exist for chronic long-term exposure to EMF or from multiple sources and reported adverse health effects from electromagnetic pollution include sleep disorders, irritability, short-term memory loss, headaches, anxiety, nausea, DNA breaks, abnormal cell growth, cancer, premature aging, etc. Because of untested technology, international scientists, environmental agencies, advocacy groups, and doctors are calling for the use of caution in wireless technologies.

  11. The primary justification given for the Smart Meters program is the assertion that it will encourage customers to move some of their electricity usage from daytime to evening hours; however, PG&E has conducted no actual pilot projects to determine whether this assumption is in fact correct. Non-transmitting time-of-day meters are already available for customers who desire the, and enhanced customer education is a viable non-technological alternative to encourage electricity use timeshifting. Further, some engineers and energy conservation experts believe that the Smart Meter program could, in totality, actually increase total energy consumption and, therefore, the carbon footprint.

  12. Assembly Member Jared Huffman has requested the California Council on Science and Technology to advise him on whether the FCC’s standards for Smart Meters are sufficiently protective and to assess whether additional technology-specific standards are needed for Smart Meters.

  13. A response to Assembly Member Huffman from the Council on Science and Technology is expected in the near future.

  14. Assembly Member Huffman has also recently introduced legislation (Assembly Bill 37) which would add a section to the Public Utilities Code to require the CPUC to identify alternative options for customers who do not wish to have a wireless Smart Meter installed and to allow customers to opt-out of wireless Smart Meter installation, including removal of existing Smart Meters when requested by the customer. Most importantly, the legislation would suspend deployment of Smart Meters until the CPUC meets the above requirements.

  15. On March 10, 2011, CPUC President directed PG&E to prepare a proposal that will allow some form of opt-out for customers who object to Smart Meters.

  16. Because the potential risks to the health, safety, and welfare of City residents are so great, the City Council wishes to adopt a moratorium on the installation of Smart Meters and related equipment within City limits. The moratorium period will allow the Council on Science and Technology and the legislative process referenced above to be completed and for additional information to be collected and analyzed regarding potential problems with Smart Meters.

  17. There is a current and immediate threat to public health, safety, and welfare because, without this urgency ordinance, Smart Meters or supporting equipment will be installed or constructed or modified in the City without PG&E’s compliance with the CPUC process for consultation with the local jurisdiction, the City’s Code requirements, and will subject residents of the City to the privacy, security, health, accuracy, and consumer fraud risks of this unproven Smart Meter technology.

  18. The City Council hereby finds that it can seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. This Ordinance does not authorize the construction or installation of any facilities and, in fact, imposes greater restrictions on such construction and installation in order to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. This Ordinance is, therefore, exempt from the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.

  19. There is no feasible alternative to satisfactorily study the potential impact identified above as well or better with a less burdensome or restrictive effect than the adoption of this interim urgency moratorium ordinance.

  20. Based on the foregoing, it is in the best interest of public health, safety and welfare to allow adequate study of the impacts resulting from the Smart Meter technology and it is, therefore, appropriate to adopt a temporary moratorium which would remain in effect from the date of adoption until December 31, 2011, unless the City acts to repeal it prior to that date.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARLAKE, ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

MORATORIUM.

From and after the effective date of this Ordinance, no Smart Meter may be installed in or on any home, apartment, condominium or business of any type within the City of Clearlake and no equipment related to Smart Meters may be installed in, on, under, or above any public street or public right-of-way within the City of Clearlake.

urgency findings

This City Council finds and determines that: (a) there is a current and immediate threat to the public peace, health, or safety; (b) the moratorium must be imposed in order to protect and preserve the public interest, health, safety, comfort, and convenience and to preserve the public welfare; and (c) It is necessary to preserve the public health and safety of all residents or landowners adjacent to such uses as are affected by this interim ordinance was well as to protect all citizens of the City of Clearlake by preserving and improving the aesthetic and economic conditions of the City.

CEQA

The City Council hereby finds and determines, that this ordinance is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment.


Severability

If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.


Effective Date

This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption if adopted by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council.

Publication

The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published within the City of Clearlake.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24 day of March, 2011, by the following vote:


AYES: Mayor Joyce Overton, Vice Mayor Joey Luiz, Council Member Jeri Spittler, Council Member Curt Giambruno, Council Member Judy Thein

NOES: None

ABSENT: None

ABSTAIN: None


___________________________________

Mayor, City of Clearlake


ATTEST:



__________________________________

City Clerk, City of Clearlake


CLEARLAKE, Calif. – With the application deadline having arrived for Clearlake city administrator applicants last Friday, the Clearlake City Council is preparing to begin the vetting process in hopes of having a new administrator by this summer.


The council is looking for a permanent candidate for the job, last held on a long-term basis by Dale Neiman, who left last November following the election.


Steve Albright, who retired as Trinidad's city manager in February, came on the same month in an interim capacity.


Albright had stated at a previous Clearlake City Council meeting that the goal was to have a new city administrator in place and ready to get to work at the start of June.


He told the council at its meeting last Thursday, March 24, that the city had gotten a good response to its recruitment. He was expecting a total of 18 people would have submitted applied by the end of the day Friday.


Compared to recruitments in previous years, “That's a pretty good number,” Albright said.


The council budgeted $1,500 to spend on advertising the recruitment, with Albright reporting that they had spent less than $1,000 so far.


Albright suggested the council appoint two members to help him narrow down the field. After looking through the applications, “I think you'll find that it's not going to be too difficult to narrow it down,” he said.


Having less than a quorum of the council involved would alleviate the requirements of the Brown Act to notice the discussions on selecting an administrator, said Albright, who suggested the council start interviewing selected candidates in April.


If two council members were appointed to work with Albright on vetting the applications, Councilman Curt Giambruno wanted to know if the other three council members would have access to the applications. Albright said he could make time to go over all of the applications with the three not involved in the review.


If they chose two council members to assist with the review, Council member Judy Thein said she wanted to see one of the newer council members – Jeri Spittler or Joey Luiz – take part. She suggested she would opt out of being involved in the initial vetting, but Luiz urged her not to, noting her experience based on past administrator selection processes.


Thein said she was concerned that, with the smaller group considering the applications, there was the possibility that a good candidate could be overlooked.


Mayor Joyce Overton said she liked having everyone included in the process, pointing to the way they had worked together in selecting Albright as the interim. She said she felt they should go through the process together, including calling meetings to do so.


The council ultimately decided to address the review as a group.


On Friday the city released an agenda for a special closed session set to start at 3 p.m. Wednesday, March 30, for the purpose of discussing the appointment. Albright had suggested that they get started on the vetting this week.


Albright told the council Thursday that a difficulty would be salary levels. That's because Clearlake's fiscal situation has become more dire in recent years, resulting last year in the city administrator spot being reduced to part-time, as Lake County News has reported.


While the new administrator is chosen, Albright is handling some major tasks for the city, including working to reach a settlement to the Sierra Club Lake Group's lawsuit against the city and KK Raphel Properties over the council's approval of a regional shopping center plan at the now-closed Pearce Field airport property on Highway 53.


In addition, Albright told the council Thursday that staff intends to schedule a first reading of a proposed medical marijuana dispensaries ordinance for the council's April 14 meeting.


“I know it's going to be controversial,” Albright said.


However, he indicated he believes staff has a document that is a good compromise that can work for the city.


E-mail Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . Follow Lake County News on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LakeCoNews, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/pages/Lake-County-News/143156775604?ref=mf and on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/LakeCoNews.

LCNews

Award winning journalism on the shores of Clear Lake. 

 

Search