Business News
Two Bay Area health and environmental groups sent a nine-point letter last week to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack and California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Secretary A.G. Kawamura detailing flaws in the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the light brown apple moth eradication program and asking Vilsack to end the program and associated quarantines in California.
The final EIR for the apple moth program, released by CDFA last month, still provides for aerial and ground pesticide spray of large populated areas and other controversial chemical treatments that the letter’s authors, Stop the Spray East Bay and Mothers of Marin Against the Spray, have been opposing for the past 3 years along with many other health and environmental organizations, scientists, physicians, public officials, and individual citizens.
The letter to Vilsack and Kawamura details nine significant defects of the EIR, including its failure to respond to public outcry against aerial spraying.
The final EIR targets for possible aerial spray significant portions of the San Francisco Bay Area, including parts of Marin, Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and San Mateo counties. Treasured recreational areas such as Mt. Tamalpais, Tilden Park, and the East Bay Hills are in the spray zone.
The letter also points to CDFA’s failure to acknowledge the fact that the apple moth has been in the state for as long as 30 years without any evidence that it is the destructive pest that the CDFA has been portraying during the past three years.
The groups object to the EIR’s statement that CDFA is prepared to use warrants and law enforcement to force ground spraying on private and public property if property owners refuse. Other treatments include placement of pesticide-filled diffusers called “twist-ties.” Apple moth treatments could be used in almost any community across California, according to the EIR.
In addition to chemical treatments, the program proposes to release of hundreds of millions of irradiated moths and predatory wasps whose potential detrimental impacts on the ecosystem are downplayed in the EIR.
The apple moth program, which costs taxpayers tens of millions of dollars annually, is planned to continue for seven years.
The final EIR could be approved by CDFA Secretary Kawamura as early as today. Despite the inherent conflict of interest, CDFA sponsored and prepared the EIR and has the authority to approve it under California’s environmental laws. Once the EIR is approved, apple moth treatments could begin within 30 days.
The letter’s list of other deficiencies in the EIR includes:
CDFA’s failure to adequately investigate the more than 600 health complaints and the deaths of seabirds filed after apple moth spraying in 2007;
CDFA’s dismissal of concern that children and pets might eat the polymer pesticide flakes now planned for aerial spraying; the EIR says, “even if quantities of Hercon Bio-Flake were ingested, the material is expected to be readily digested and eliminated with no adverse effects on the individual”;
CDFA’s failure to address the scientific evidence that the moth is not a problem anywhere else in the world that it is an introduced species, including New Zealand and Hawaii;
CDFA’s failure to disclose the full formulas of the pesticides it plans to use, making it impossible for the public to evaluate the health and environmental risk of the treatments;
CDFA’s failure to address numerous problems with the science underlying the program that were identified by a National Academy of Sciences expert panel last year, including the failure to justify eradication as a feasible goal for the moth or the fact that the state’s trapping data for the moth are essentially meaningless for determining whether the moth population is spreading or growing.
The letter requests that Secretary Vilsack take immediate action to reclassify the apple moth as a non-quarantinable pest, in accordance with the evidence presented in two scientific petitions to the USDA on this topic last year, to end apple moth quarantines and stop the expensive, dangerous, unnecessary, and scientifically infeasible eradication program.
The program is funded and continuing because the apple moth is classified by the USDA as an “actionable pest of quarantine,” which triggers trade restrictions.
“There are serious health risks associated with the exposure to even minute amounts of pesticides. Children are particularly vulnerable because of their developing bodies, frequent outdoor play, and inability to eliminate toxins,” states Debbie Friedman, chair of MOMAS. “It is extremely troubling that USDA and CDFA continue to waste hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars on such an unnecessary, unsafe and poorly justified program, particularly during these tight economic times.”
“The final EIR makes clear that state officials have ignored the call to base the apple moth program on sound science,” said Nan Wishner of Stop the Spray East Bay. “CDFA has been manufacturing and cherry-picking science from the outset to try to try to justify this unnecessary, ineffective, and dangerous program, and this EIR is just one more example.
The final Environmental Impact Report can be downloaded at: http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pdep/lbam/envimpactrpt.html .
The letter to Secretary Vilsack can be downloaded at: www.eastbay.stopthespray.org .
- Details
- Written by: Stop the Spray East Bay and Mothers of Marin Against the Spray
SACRAMENTO – First District Assemblyman Wesley Chesbro (D-Arcata) has introduced a bill to create “The Plastic Ocean Pollution Reduction, Recycling and Composting Act.”
AB 2138 would require the fast food industry to reduce and recycle packaging waste and litter by requiring the use of packaging that is recyclable or compostable in the communities where it is used.
“Plastic ocean pollution is a persistent and growing problem,” Chesbro said. “Despite international treaties prohibiting dumping plastics at sea and other international, national, state and local action, trash in the ocean is increasing. Trash that washes into our waterways and bays poses a real and pressing threat to marine life. California must take on a leadership role in protecting our oceans.”
Chesbro, who chairs the Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, recently held an investigative hearing on ocean pollution and the accumulation of toxic materials in California Coastal waters. The testimony given at the hearing is the foundation of the “The Plastic Ocean Pollution Reduction, Recycling and Composting Act.”
Single-use food packaging litter kills wildlife such as birds and endangered sea turtles, which become entangled in it or mistake it for food and try to ingest it. More than a million sea birds, 100,000 marine mammals and countless fish have died from marine debris.
Single-use food packaging that isn’t recycled costs California families hundreds of dollars annually in hidden litter clean-up costs.
Local governments are especially hard hit by these costs. The city of Los Angeles estimates that compliance with total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for its impaired waterways, including those for litter pollution, will cost more than $1 billion. Plastic pollution severely threatens California’s $43 billion ocean economy.
“The volume of unrecyclable single-use food packaging distributed annually in California is staggering,” Chesbro said. “The fast-food industry alone generates four million tons of waste annually in California and retailers are currently distributing almost fourteen billion plastic bags annually. AB 2138 would prohibit restaurants and other food providers from distributing single-use food packaging and bags unless they are accepted for either recycling or composting from at least seventy five percent of households in a jurisdiction and are recovered at rate of at least twenty five percent.”
This policy will make the fast-food industry financially responsible for:
Switching to packaging that is compatible with the recycling and/or composting services available in the communities they serve.
Working with local governments and recyclers to increase processing and market capacity for recyclable and compostable packaging alternatives.
Working with consumers to ensure that their packaging is recycled or composted.
“This legislation would reduce the cost to local governments for cleaning up the tons of plastic waste that is entering our waterways and polluting our beaches and the ocean,” Chesbro said. “This bill will build a recycling infrastructure that will both protect the environment and create new green jobs in California. We can lead the nation and leave a cleaner and safer ocean for the next generation.”
- Details
- Written by: Office of Assemblyman Wes Chesbro
How to resolve AdBlock issue?