Details

Written by: Thomas K. Gore II

Published: 02 June 2008

Created: 01 June 2008

Last Updated: 02 June 2008

This case is making news all across the country. It is obvious that when a sailboat has the right of way and is run over by a power boat that the power boat with its greater maneuverability is at fault. Even if it is driven by a sheriff. That the driver of the sailboat is being prosecuted is a travesty of justice.

If you can get ahold of a copy of “Chapman's Piloting, Seamanship, and Small Boat Handling,” I'm using the 62nd Edition, starting on page 134 it discusses the "Rules of the Road" with the pertinent parts being on page 138, "Determining Safe Speed"; page 139, "Determining Risk of Collision" and "Actions to Avoid Collisions"; page 140, "General Right of Way Provisions," "Actions by the Give-way Vessel"; page 142, "Sailing Vessel Rules"; particularly the part on Page 143 titled "Sail's right of way over power."

I think that these sections should give you enough background material to make the case.

Thomas K. Gore II lives in Oxford, MD.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

Details

Written by: Christopher Bodley

Published: 01 June 2008

Created: 01 June 2008

Last Updated: 01 June 2008

Last Monday I spent part of my day paying my respect to those who gave their lives for this country. But one thing I realized is that I was the only one from my generation there. What is this world coming to?

It's so crazy that people just don’t get it, every breath of air that you breathe is due to someone giving their life or even just a part of it so we could live free. Freedom is not free and it comes with a price.

Today I wonder for the first time in my life if I was one of them where would my friends be on the day of thanks and memory to those brothers and sisters who gave all so we could be free? I give my life to this country regardless of outcome. One thing I know as a soldier and a free person is you can't take what someone gives, and not everyone is willing to give that much so that others can live with the freedom they have.

I hope we as a whole never forget and lose sight of what this country is about. All the free choices we have and my choice is that I will remember those before me and I will stand for what they gave their lives for.

I’m a father first and a soldier second and will never let my kids think that its just a parade and that its just another day to have fun. Its a day to remember and we will as a family and as free people.

County resident Sgt. Christopher M. Bodley spent four years in the Marines and now serves with the California Army National Guard.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}

Details

Written by: Wanda Harris

Published: 30 May 2008

Created: 30 May 2008

Last Updated: 30 May 2008

Lake County voters who live in county supervisorial District 5 have received a paid slate mailer this week that contains misleading information. The title of the mailer is “Voter Information Guide for

Democrats for the June 3 Primary Election.”

The Lake County Democratic Central Committee and all three of its chartered clubs have officially endorsed Robert Stark for District 5 county supervisor.

If voters take the time to read the fine print on this mailer, they will learn that this is a paid slate mailer, meaning candidates and campaigns make payments to this company to add their names to the slate mailer.

The mailer's fine print reads, "Appearance in this mailer does not necessarily imply endorsement by others appearing in this mailer, nor does it imply endorsement of or opposition to any issues set forth in this mailer." It also says the mailer was "not paid for or authorized by candidates not designated by an asterisk *." If voters continue to read the mailer, they will find that none of the Democratic candidates listed paid to be on this mailer.

An asterisk * appears by District 5 Candidate Rob Brown's name. He paid to be on this mailer, implying wrongly that he is endorsed by the Democratic Party and has the personal endorsements of the Democratic candidates listed on the mailer.

The mailer also has recommendations for the two initiatives that will be on the June ballot. It recommends a NO vote on 98 and a YES vote on 99.

Those are the official recommendations of the California Democratic Party.

In the May 27 interview with the online news service www.lakeconews.com, candidate Brown is quoted as saying, “I have consistently opposed eminent domain and I support 98 and oppose 99.”

http://lakeconews.com/content/view/4337/764/

Those are the official positions of the California Republican Party.

http://www.cagop.org/index.cfm/june_ballot_propositions.htm

This same company put out a similar mailer in November of 2006 that featured our Democratic Senator from California, Dianne Feinstein, and ballot recommendations opposing propositions 86 and 87, the oil excise tax and cigarette tax initiatives.

Sen. Feinstein firmly supported those initiatives and decried this misleading mailer and the sleazy tactics employed therein via a press release from her office.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20061104/ai_n16829506

The company that put out this mailer is called Voter Information Guide. It is owned by Larry E. Levine. It also has a private consulting business called: Larry Levine and Associates, located at 13701 Riverside Dr., Ste. 604, Sherman Oaks, CA 91423, 818-906-8747. The company is listed on the American Association of Political Consultants membership roster.

A pre-election campaign filing deadline for reporting expenditures ended on May 22.

http://www.fppc.ca.gov/filingschedules/2008/June2008/localcan-measjune3.pdf

Campaign expenditures and donations are public information. A political party or a candidate's campaign expenditures and donations are public record available to any citizen who requests them from the County Registrar of Voters.

An informed electorate is critical in order to ensure that our democracy thrives. Vote on June 3 and let your voice be heard.

Wanda Harris is chair of the Lake County Democratic Central Committee. She lives in Hidden Valley.

{mos_sb_discuss:4}