Dodd announces run for District 4 Assembly seat

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA – Napa County Supervisor Bill Dodd has announced his candidacy for next year’s race for the Assembly 4th District seat.
Dodd, a Napa County supervisor and small businessman, cited job growth, education, supporting California’s aging population and the unique rural needs of the 4th District as his priorities if elected.
“I’m running to return California government’s focus to investing in its people, especially in our children’s future,” Dodd said.
The 4th Assembly District includes all of Napa and Lake counties, most of Yolo County, and portions of Solano, Sonoma and Colusa counties.
Mariko Yamada, who currently holds the seat, will be termed out next year, and with the seat open a large field has begun to form.
Dodd joins a group of candidates that now includes Lake County Supervisor Anthony Farrington, Davis Mayor Joe Krovoza, Napa County Planning Commissioner Matt Pope and Davis Mayor Pro Tem Dan Wolk, as Lake County News has reported.
“State government used to make smart investments, the kind that nurtured Silicon Valley’s creation,” he continued. “We can do it again. That means investing in schools, universities, transportation, and protecting our unique environment – the things that help produce good-paying California jobs.
Dodd, a Democrat from Napa County, also stressed his commitment to changing the political climate in the Legislature.
“For too long, the legislature has put politics above progress,” said Dodd. “During my 13 years on the board of supervisors, we’ve tackled – and solved – big problems by bringing people together.
“Sacramento politics-as-usual imperils California’s future prosperity. I will bring a cooperative, problem-solving spirit to the state Capitol.”
Dodd also serves on the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
Born in Napa, Dodd has lived in the 4th Assembly District his entire life.
He attended local schools and California State University, Chico. He went on to become a small business owner with Culligan Water franchises throughout the North Bay.
Dodd and his wife, Mary, have five children and two grandchildren.
- Details
- Written by: Lake County News reports
State denies emergency help for Lakeside Heights; board continues local emergency status
LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday considered ending a local emergency for the Lakeside Heights subdivision but in the end took no action to do so, even though it appears that the county can expect no state or federal emergency declarations.
The county's leaders have worked for three months to find a core cause of the landslide that began to manifest in late March and has since resulted in about seven homes being red-tagged and several more being voluntarily evacuated in the 29-home hilltop subdivision, located off of Hill Road.
In April, the board passed a proclamation declaring a local emergency, a necessary step in seeking state and federal emergency assistance, as Lake County News has reported.
At the same time, Lake County Special Districts – which oversees the sewer and water facilities for the subdivision – has moved forward with studies and engineering work in an effort to relocate endangered infrastructure.
After waiting for two months for a state emergency declaration, the county has been informed that one isn't coming.
County Administrative Officer Matt Perry told the board that last Tuesday, June 18, the county was contacted by the California Emergency Management Agency assistant secretary, who informed them that Gov. Jerry Brown was declining their emergency proclamation request.
“There's probably no surprise there,” said Perry.
Perry said staff prepared a resolution for the supervisors' consideration that would terminate the local emergency declaration.
In considering whether or not to take action on that proposed resolution, the board heard an update from Special Districts Administrator Mark Dellinger.
“There is still measurable movement in a lower part of the slide that we've noticed just in the past week,” Dellinger told the board.
Meanwhile, Dellinger did have some good news to report. He said the county is receiving $59,700 from the State Water Resources Control Board for the sewer infrastructure relocation and $46,886 from the California Department of Public Health's emergency water fund, which will help the county with work on the water side, including reimbursing it for $17,000 in geotechnical work, $16,000 for the compound master water meter and vault, $4,000 for labor and monitoring, and $4,000 for two of the four leak tests.
Dellinger said he had authorized the county's geotechnical contractor to get going on the necessary work that must be completed to receive the funding.
Dellinger told Lake County News later on Tuesday that he's not sure how much money the infrastructure relocation in Lakeside Heights will cost, as the project hasn't been designed yet.
He told the board that time is of the essence when it comes to moving the subdivision's water and sewer facilities. The work must be moved by wintertime.
“I need to be able to move quickly to get that work done,” said Dellinger.
The local emergency allows Dellinger to bypass the bidding process, which he said is necessary in order to meet the project deadlines. He said he wants to use the same team he's been using for projects such as the emergency pump station and bypass in Clearlake a few years ago.
“That will allow us to get this work done as quickly as possible,” Dellinger said.
Dellinger estimated that the design and geotechnical work on the water and sewer infrastructure relocation projects could be done by the end of August, with construction to take place as quickly as possible afterward.
Supervisor Denise Rushing asked if the recent rains will have an impact on the conditions at the subdivision.
Dellinger reported that he hadn't seen any new impacts. He said the movement that he had seen and reported earlier in the meeting was noticed before any recent rain had occurred.
County Public Works Director Scott De Leon, the county's incident commander on the Lakeside Heights emergency, said the county is now looking at winterization options for the subdivision's infrastructure. “October's going to be right around the corner.”
Dellinger said he's trying to do as much with grant funds as possible and not use a $350,000 loan the board approved from the county's infrastructure fund to help with the work.
Concerns about lifting the emergency
Supervisor Anthony Farrington, whose district includes Lakeside Heights, was concerned about lifting the local emergency while there was still land movement and uncertainty about how the landslide might act. He said the landslide still posed a health and safety issue, with damaged structures still to be abated.
He asked about what the downside would be of keeping the emergency in place.
“This is fact driven,” said County Counsel Anita Grant, explaining that the emergency ultimately depended on the board's determination. If the board believed the circumstances were still urgent but not an emergency, the county could still continue to take action.
What the law requires, Grant said, is that emergencies not be continued beyond the point where an actual emergency exists.
Farrington said when he looked at the potential for the unknown and concerns for what is ahead, it seemed to him in an emergency situation still existed.
He suggested the county needed to have an additional meeting with homeowners to give them a status update. Farrington said some of the subdivision's homeowners had communicated with him about their belief that they had lost property value and security. He said the geotechnical consultant might be able to help address residents' ground stability concerns.
Board Chair Jeff Smith suggested that, since the county had been turned down for funding for this particular emergency, that it might be best to end the emergency status and reopen a future emergency if necessary. He also pointed out that the county can continue to address issues of the subdivision without the emergency status in place.
Rushing said she would defer to Farrington's judgment on the matter, noting she could go either way, with the still-moving ground and recent rains complicating the matter.
Dellinger said county staff would continue to actively monitor the Lakeside Heights landslide and return to the board if anything happened.
Farrington asked that the emergency status be kept in place until the county's geotechnical contractor completes a report on the subdivision landslide.
The board ended up taking no action to change the emergency status. Smith said the next discussion on Lakeside Heights is scheduled for July 23.
The board also approved a request from Mark Tanti, a partner in Argonaut Properties LLC – which owns several parcels in the subdivision – to transfer seven water meter connection from several parcels in the subdivision to three other parcels within County Service Area No. 21.
Supervisor Rob Brown recused himself from both discussions, as his daughter and son-in-law own a home in the subdivision.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
New fiscal year budget, Lakeshore Drive building moratorium proposal go to Clearlake City Council
CLEARLAKE, Calif. – The Clearlake City Council this week will consider adopting the city's new fiscal year budget and discuss pursuing a temporary moratorium the city manager is proposing on building and remodel projects on Lakeshore Drive.
The council will meet in closed session at 5:30 p.m. Thursday, June 27, in the council chambers at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive, to discuss property negotiations before convening at 6 p.m. for the public portion of the meeting.
The main item on the Thursday agenda is the acceptance of the proposed 2013-14 fiscal year budget.
City Manager Joan Phillipe's report to the council shows that the proposed budget has $10,735,631 in appropriations and transfers from the city's general fund, and the redevelopment and housing successor agencies.
The budget document is the product of staff work and two council budget workshops, on June 6 and June 20.
In her budget message, Phillipe said the proposed budget is one where appropriations are balanced with revenues and other resources. However, she notes in her report to the council, “the City does need to grow its reserves and still faces many budgetary challenges.”
She said the city's general fund budget was balanced with appropriately $300,000 in one-time revenues.
In addition to considering adoption of the final budget, the council will discuss fiscal year 2013-14 goals and objectives and the revised budget and investment policies.
In other business, Phillipe is asking the council to consider giving her direction to craft a temporary moratorium on building construction and major remodels on Lakeshore Drive between Olympic Drive and Old Highway 53.
The reason, Phillipe said in her report to the council, arises from the city not having adopted design guidelines for any of its “design district” zoning areas, “meaning that there is no ability for staff or the planning commission to review projects and require design features that would be compatible with the area.”
She continued in her report, “It makes sense to consider taking a step back and stopping future development on the Lakeshore Drive corridor for a short period of time to get the corridor study adopted and consider guidelines that it sets forth along with design guidelines that have been previously suggested,” in order that development in that area is consistent with the vision that has been set forth.
If the council is on board, Phillipe said staff will return with a proposed ordinance at the July 11 council meeting. She's also suggesting that the matter be referred to the Clearlake Planning Commission for recommendation on the guidelines from the Vision Task Force combined with the Lakeshore Downtown Corridor Study.
Also on Thursday, the council will discuss placing a 1-percent sales tax measure on an upcoming ballot to be used specifically for street improvements, maintenance and code enforcement.
A similar sales tax measure, Measure G, failed last November in the city.
Other agenda items include discussion of sending a letter in opposition to SB 7, introduced by Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento), which Phillipe said would post a threat to local city authority; award of a contract for a long range property management plan as part of the continuing process of dissolving the Clearlake Redevelopment Agency; and endorsement of the legislative agenda of the League of California Cities Redwood Empire Division of the League of California Cities, the Public Agency Risk Sharing Authority of California, Area Planning Council, Local Agency Formation Commission and the Lake County Vector Control District.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Supervisors to discuss Lakeside Heights, educational programs agreement with Marymount
LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Board of Supervisors is set to discuss an agreement with Marymount California University for educational programs and will get an update on the latest developments at a north Lakeport subdivision where a landslide has damaged several homes.
The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. Tuesday, June 25, in the board chambers on the first floor of the Lake County Courthouse, 255 N. Forbes St., Lakeport. It will be broadcast live on TV8.
At 9:10 a.m., the board will get an update on the situation at the Lakeside Heights subdivision, where beginning in late March a landslide began destroying several homes and forcing many families to leave. The board also will consider a continued state of local emergency and other actions.
In an untimed item, the board also will discuss a request from Mark Tanti, a partner in Argonaut Properties, who owns several properties in Lakeside Heights, to transfer water meter connections from the Lakeside Heights Subdivision to three other parcels within CSA No. 21.
Also in untimed items, the board will take up a proposed memorandum of understanding between the county of Lake and Marymount California University, which is opening its third campus at the Lucerne Hotel, for educational programs.
Supervisors also will consider a policy providing for county employee scholarships to Marymount California University for professional and educational development.
The full agenda follows. Some items are out of order due to three addendums being issued after the main agenda.
TIMED ITEMS
9 a.m., A-1 to A-4: Approval of consent agenda, which includes items that are expected to be routine and noncontroversial, and will be acted upon by the board at one time without discussion; presentation of animals available for adoption at Lake County Animal Care and Control; consideration of items not appearing on the posted agenda, and contract change orders for current construction projects.
9:05 a.m.: Citizen's input. Any person may speak for three minutes about any subject of concern, provided that it is within the jurisdiction of the Board of Supervisors and is not already on the agenda. Prior to this time, speakers must fill out a slip giving name, address and subject (available in the clerk of the board’s office, first floor, courthouse).
9:10 a.m., A-5: (a) Update on Lakeside Heights Subdivision; and (b) consideration of services continued state of local emergency and any other actions.
9:15 a.m., A-6: Public hearing, (a) consideration of request for a General Plan Amendment (GPAP 12-06) of approximately 10 acres from Low Density Residential, Suburban Residential Reserve, Public Facilities and Resource Conservation to Community Commercial, Public Facilities and Resource Conservation and a Rezone (RZ 12-06) from “PDR-FF” Planned Development Residential-Floodway Fringe and “OFF-FW-WW” Open Space-Floodway Fringe-Floodway-Waterway to “C2-FF” Community Commercial-Floodway Fringe and “O-FF-FWWW” Open Space-Floodway Fringe-Floodway-Waterway; Project Applicant is Valley Oaks Land and Development, Inc.; located at 18765 Hartmann Road, Middletown, CA (APN 014-260-24); and (b) consideration of proposed Lakeport Area Plan Update (GPAP 13-01), proposing revisions to the zoning and general plan maps within the Lakeport Planning Area (RZ 13-01) and a proposed addendum to the environmental impact report (EIR) previously prepared for the area plan.
9:30 a.m., A-7: Hearing, nuisance abatement assessment confirmation and code enforcement proposed recordation of notice of lien in the amount of $10,639.02 - 2213 New Long Valley Road, Clearlake Oaks, CA (APN 620-091-20 - Melvin Dooley and Frances Dooley).
9:45 a.m., A-8: Consideration of the Lake County Weed Management Plan.
10 a.m., A-9: Assessment Appeal Hearing: Karl Petermann - Application Nos. 329-2010 and 330-2010 – 5201 Lake Road, Lower Lake, CA (APN 010-033-090-000) and 5230 Panorama Road, Lower Lake, CA (APN 010-033-100-000); Susan Jaeger - Application No. 05-2011 - 9875 Nancy Drive, Kelseyville, CA (APN 114-100-111-000).
11 a.m., A-10: Consideration of request to allocate $30,000 from the AB 1905 account for the completion of the Anderson Springs noise study.
NONTIMED ITEMS
A-11: Supervisors’ weekly calendar, travel and reports.
A-12: Consideration of appointments to the Emergency Medical Care Committee.
A-13: Consideration of proposed lease agreement between the county of Lake and Big Oak Center for office space located at 13300 East Highway 20, Suite O, Clearlake Oaks, to use as a Sheriff Substation.
A-14: Carried over from June 11, consideration of proposed letters to Sens. Steinberg and Leno regarding SB 439 relating to medical marijuana cooperatives, collectives and business entities.
A-15: Continued from April 23 and June 11, consideration of proposed resolution of support of SB 135 (Padilla) Earthquake Early Warning System Act.
A-16: (a) Consideration of proposed memorandum of understanding between the county of Lake and Marymount California University for educational programs; and (b) consideration of policy providing for county employee scholarships to Marymount California University for professional and educational development.
A-17: (a) Consideration of request to waive the formal bidding process, determining that the unique nature of the system precludes competitive bidding, pursuant to Article X, Section 2-38.2 of the Lake County Code; and (b) approve purchase of surveillance system for the Narcotics Task Force facility and authorize the sheriff/assistant purchasing agent to issue a purchase order for the surveillance system.
A-18: Carried over from Nov. 6 and 13, 2012, and June 11, (a) consideration of request to approve purchase of fixed assets: 10 Glock 17 duty weapons, 12 Glock 34 SWAT weapons, 20 Glock 17 magazines, 1 Model 40-XS .308W tactical weapon; and (b) consideration of request to award bids to All State Police Equipment Co. in the amount of $6565.10, LC Action Police Supply in the amount of $8,481.24, ProForce Law Enforcement in the amount of $2,649.25, and McMillan Firearms Manufacturing LLC, in the amount of $9168.12
A-19: Consideration of request to transfer water meter connections from the Lakeside Heights Subdivision to three other parcels within CSA No. 21.
A-21: Consideration of budget transfer from general fund contingencies or other source to pay court ordered attorney fees in the matter of Jensen and Larson v. Sheriff Rivero.
A-22: Consideration of proposed letters to state representatives requesting amendments to SB740 and AB1299: California Advanced Services Fund for developing broadband service in unserved areas of California.
CLOSED SESSION
A-20: 1.Conference with Labor Negotiator: (a) County Negotiators: A. Grant, L. Guintivano, S. Harry, M. Perry, A. Flora and C. Shaver; and (b) Employee Organization: Deputy District Attorney's Association, Lake County Deputy Sheriff's Association, Lake County Correctional Officers Association, Lake County Employees Association and Lake County Safety Employees Association.
A-20: 2. Carried over from June 18, conference with legal counsel: Existing Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) (CalWater).
A-20: 3. Existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1) - Rivero v. Board of Supervisors.
A-20: 4. Conference with real property negotiator, (a) property located at: 3980 Gard St., Kelseyville (APN 024-081-01); (b) negotiating parties: for county: Supervisor Rob Brown, Child Support Services Director Gail Woodworth, County Administrative Officer Matt Perry and Deputy County Administrative Officer Alan Flora; for seller: Kelseyville Unified School District representatives (c) under negotiation: Lease terms.
A-20: 5. Conference with legal counsel: Existing litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): City of Lakeport v. County of Lake, et. al.
A-20: 6. Existing Litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(1): Jensen and Larson v. Lake County Sheriff’s Office, et al.
A-20: 7. Conference with Legal Counsel - Decision whether to initiate litigation pursuant to Gov. Code Sec. 54956.9(d)(4): Cal Water Rulemaking Proceeding 11-11-008 (CPUC).
CONSENT AGENDA
C-1: Approve minutes of the Board of Supervisors meeting held on June 18, 2013.
C-2: Adopt proclamation commending Shannon Gunier for her years of service to the Winegrape Commission.
C-3: Adopt resolution appropriating unanticipated revenue to Budget Unit 2601, Agriculture Commissioner to fund weed control programs ($30,800 in unclaimed gas tax).
C-4: (a) Adopt resolution approving a cooperative service agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to continue the legal framework for the Wildlife Services Program for the county of Lake; (b) adopt Categorical Exemption Class 8 for the Wildlife Services Program, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
C-5: Adopt resolution approving the amendment to the standard agreement between the county of Lake and the California Department of Health Care Services for the period between May 1, 2013 and June 30, 2018.
C-6: (a) Accept grant funds from the Redbud Health Care District in the amount of $17,415; (b) waive the formal bidding process, determining that competitive bidding would produce no economic benefit to the county; (c) approve purchase of Case Cracker audio/visual system for the Multidisciplinary Interview Center, in the amount of $17,415 and authorize the district attorney/assistant purchasing agent to issue a purchase order to Cardinal Peak in the amount of $17,415; and (d) authorize the county administrative officer and the chair to sign the grant agreement and certification of grant terms and conditions.
C-7: Adopt resolution authorizing the submission of a grant application to the California Department of Public Health HIV/AIDS Program for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 through 2015-2016 and authorizing the Health Services director to sign said application and grant.
C-8: Approve the completion of County Bridge 14C-0248 using county employees, as authorized by the California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Act.
C-9: Approve agreement between the county of Lake and the California Department of Transportation to participate in the FY 2012/13 Optional RSTP Federal Exchange and State Match Program, and authorize the chair to sign.
C-10: Approve lease agreement between the county of Lake and the Lillian Allen Trust, for office space located at 1216, 1218 and 1222 South Main St., Lakeport, CA, at a rate of $1300 per month, and authorize the Social Services director to sign.
C-11: Adopt resolution appropriating unanticipated revenue to Budget Unit Cooperative Extension 6131, University of California Cooperative Extension ($2,586.78 from the University of California).
LAKE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
C-12: Award Bid SD 13-09 to 3T Equipment Co. Inc. for sewer pipeline camera system, in the amount of $33,362.63, and authorize the Special Districts administrator/assistant purchasing agent to issue a purchase order.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Council approves marijuana cultivation ordinance, new fiscal year budget
LAKEPORT, Calif. – The Lakeport City Council approved a new marijuana cultivation ordinance and the city's 2013-14 fiscal year budget after brief discussions at Tuesday night's regular meeting.
Both items had been before the council previously in recent weeks, with the council approving the marijuana cultivation ordinance's first reading May 21 and conducting a workshop on the budget two weeks ago.
The ordinance requires that marijuana grows be conducted in accessory outdoor structures, prohibiting outside grows and, according to city officials, placing emphasis on a complaint-driven process in which acts of noncompliance are infractions that garner citations and are handled through the city's administrative citation process.
At the May 21 meeting, city officials also indicated that a public education process about the ordinance's rules will be undertaken before any serious enforcement goes forward.
In February a different proposed ordinance went to the council, which decided to create a committee of city staff and community members to bring something back that would seek to more broadly address community needs and concerns, as Lake County News has reported.
The document the committee created went to the Lakeport Planning Commission and received its recommendation that the council approve it before the first reading was held late last month.
On Tuesday night, there was only public comment from city resident Bob Bridges.
“I support what you're doing and I support staff's draft,” Bridges said.
He said he was there to respond to “erroneous” comments by a local attorney about what the city could and couldn't do.
Bridges was alluding to Lower Lake attorney Ron Green, who had participated in the city's marijuana committee meetings but then appeared at the May 21 council meeting on behalf of the Emerald Unity Coalition, criticizing the document and warning the council that it could be sued over the ordinance. Green was not present for Tuesday night's meeting.
Bridges, who is a senior deputy county counsel for Lake County, said he's spent a lot of time studying marijuana law.
“I just want to make sure the city council knows that the California Supreme Court has told you that you have complete discretion on land use matters on this,” he said, referring to a recent court decision that upheld local governments' ability to regulate medical marijuana through zoning laws.
As such, Bridges maintained that the city's proposed ordinance is “totally legal and viable.”
Bridges said the city needs an effective law that is enforced. He added that if anyone thinks more marijuana growing is needed locally, they should consider the estimated 10,000 sites where grows legally can take place in the county jurisdiction. Growing in an urban environment like Lakeport isn't appropriate, he added.
Councilman Kenny Parlet moved to approve the ordinance, with Councilman Martin Scheel seconding. The council's vote was 5-0.
Mayor Tom Engstrom thanked everyone who had worked on creating the document, including the committee. “We appreciate all the hard work you put in.”
The meeting's other main item, the 2013-14 budget, also was approved unanimously.
The new budget has $14.42 million in revenue, $16.72 million in total expenditures and a $3.4 million appropriations, or Gann, limit, according to city documents.
In other business, the council held a public hearing and approved City Manager Margaret Silveira's report to close out a Community Development Block Grant which the city had applied for in order to grant small business loans.
While many businesses were interested, the rules were so restrictive that the city was not able to make any loans, and so $270,000 in unused funds is returning to the state, Silveira said.
“This is happening to many, many cities,” said Silveira.
She reported that a roundtable on CDBG funds is scheduled on Wednesday for representatives from cities from around the state who are expected to weigh in on how the program should be changed.
The city council also approved a first reading of a draft ordinance to establish new mobile catering rules in the city.
Planning Services Manager Andrew Britton said the council in February directed staff to draft an ordinance after considering a report from an ad hoc committee on handling commercial catering businesses.
The document suggested allowing such businesses to stay at a single location for two hours at a time rather than one hour, with a permitting process with $206 in fees for those businesses seeking to stay in a spot longer than two hours at a time, Britton said.
He explained that, among other things, the document is meant to create rules to allow such businesses to operate while protecting permanent restaurants that have invested heavily in their locations, and to reduce the potential for unfair business advantage.
The rules include requiring that equipment be in good condition and the associated vehicles licensed with the California Department of Motor Vehicles; prohibiting portable and freestanding signs; and a requirement that no furniture associated with such businesses be located within the public right of way.
Parlet said he was totally in support of street vendors, but said that vendors whose equipment and vehicles are haphazard can detract from the look of the city.
The council also unanimously approved a $5,412 proposed contract between the city and the county of Lake for a server upgrade for the Lakeport Police Department.
Police Chief Brad Rasmussen said the server would be managed by the Lake County Information Technology Department, with the upgrade paid for through Proposition 172 public safety funds.
The council also approved Utilities Director Mark Brannigan's proposal to raise the commercial sewer consumption allotment from eight to 10 units as part of an effort to encourage businesses to invest in irrigation meters.
Mayor Pro Team Stacey Mattina recused herself from the discussion because she has a commercial account that would be affected by the change.
A scheduled discussion on whether to allow Zumba instructor Melissa Maberry to conduct classes at the gazebo in Library Park four nights a week was held over to a future meeting as Maberry was unavailable and could not be present Tuesday night.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
How to resolve AdBlock issue? 



