How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
Business News
- Details
- Written by: Editor
The Regional Water Board voted unanimously today to approve a final EIR certification for a program of dairy manure digester and co-digesters in the Central Valley.
This is the culmination of an intense, 11-month interagency effort. It will enable state agencies to achieve Governor Schwarzenegger’s mandates to reduce permit processing times by at least 50 percent for projects in renewable energy.
“This achievement will be recognized as a major contribution by the Water Board towards achieving the state’s climate goals,” observed Central Valley Regional Water Board Chair Katherine Hart.
At Friday’s meeting, the Water Board adopted a general order for digester facilities located on dairies.
The board anticipates at least one or more general order to regulate the various types of manure and co-digestion facilities to protect water quality.
The adoption of the general orders will enable the Water Board to reduce the time required to permit dairy digester projects by at least 75 percent.
Dairy manure digester and co-digester projects can provide benefits to the state by generating usable methane (a byproduct of cow manure) and by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Dairy manure digesters capture methane gas that can then be used to generate electricity or used as a substitute for conventional natural gas. Methane is one of the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming. Co-digesters convert, in addition to manure, agricultural and food processing waste, green waste, and fats, oils and grease into energy.
State and local agencies that worked with the Central Valley Regional Water Board in developing the program EIR include: the State Water Resources Control Board; Air Resources Board; the Department of Food and Agriculture; the Energy Commission; the Public Utilities Commission; the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; the California Environmental Protection Agency; and the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery.
“We fully support the effort to make it easier to permit digesters,” said Air Resources Board Deputy Executive Officer, Bob Fletcher. “This effort to streamline the process will help accelerate the number of digesters in California and address climate change by reducing the amount of methane, a potent greenhouse gas that enters the atmosphere.”
The EIR indicates that the program would result in a net maximum reduction of 1.6 million metric tons per year of Carbon Dioxide or CO2 equivalent emissions under the EIR’s build-out scenario, which assumes 200 dairy digesters, would be constructed over the next 10 years.
“This is an example of how agencies can work together to align the permitting process to help California agriculture diversify into the renewable energy sector while protecting our environment,” said California Secretary of Food and Agriculture, A.G. Kawamura. “Development of dairy digesters represents a potential revenue opportunity for dairy farm families during these tough economic times while at the same time assisting the state in reaching its ambitious renewable energy goals.”
Energy Commission Vice Chair James Boyd says that the “program EIR shows the benefits from California interagency efforts and how working together helps the state to meet the goals of Governor Schwarzenegger’s executive order which calls for 20 percent of renewable energy from biomass resources, and a minimum of 20 percent of its biofuels developed within California by 2010, 40 percent by 2020, and upwards.”
The program EIR assesses the environmental impacts associated with manure digester and co-digester facilities throughout the Central Valley.
The program EIR will expedite the environmental permitting and regulation of digester and co-digester facilities within the Central Valley for many state and local agencies.
Other state and local permitting agencies may use the Program EIR to satisfy CEQA requirements for other permits related to dairy manure digester and co-digester projects, thus streamlining the permitting process.
For more information:
- Details
- Written by: Editor
Use tax is owed when a consumer makes a purchase from an out-of-state retailer who is not required to collect California tax.
That means online, catalog and other out-of-state purchases are not tax-free, as some consumers believe.
When the out-of-state retailer does not collect the tax, the consumer is responsible to make the use tax payment directly to the state.
The use tax owed is the same as the sales tax that would be due if the purchase were made from an in-state retailer.
With online and catalog sales up for the holiday season, Yee reminds consumers to save receipts, calculate the use tax due and make the payment to the state.
“The dollars lost to California in unpaid use tax significantly impact the state’s publicly funded programs and affect all Californians,” said Yee.
Sales tax applies to most in-state retail purchases of tangible personal property.
Online or catalog retailers are not required to collect tax unless they have a physical presence in California. The consumer is required to pay use tax when the out-of-state retailer does not collect tax.
The sales and use tax rate varies in California from 8.25 percent to 10.75 percent, depending on location.
The most convenient way to pay the use tax to the BOE is on the Franchise Tax Board income tax return by noting the amount owed on the line marked “Use Tax” and make the payment along with any income taxes that are due.
Consumers may also file directly with the BOE as a use tax consumer by filling out form BOE 79-B: www.boe.ca.gov/pdf/pub79b.pdf.
The updated 2009-10 BOE use tax estimate, released in a report titled Electronic Commerce and Mail Order Sales, shows the unpaid sales and use tax liability owed by the average California household is $61 per year and $102 per year for each California business.
California use tax has been the law since 1935. It was established to eliminate the price advantage out of state retailers would have over California businesses that collect and send sales tax to the BOE.
The $1.145 billion dollars in unpaid sales and use tax associated with electronic commerce and mail order sales that are not voluntarily paid is a significant component of the sales and use tax gap, the difference between taxes owed and taxes paid.
For more information on other taxes and fees in California, visit www.taxes.ca.gov.
- Details
- Written by: Editor
SACRAMENTO – As winter nears and the nights turn chilly, many people will choose to heat their homes with a nice, warm wood fire in the fireplace.
While there are many wood dealers eager to sell at attractive prices, how do consumers know they're getting a good, fair deal?
The only way to know for sure is to measure what is sold.
Firewood has its own special unit of measurement called a “cord.” Firewood, in units of 1/8th of a cord and above, must be sold by the cord or fractions of a cord. A cord of wood by law must equal 128 cubic feet.
To determine if there is a cord, the wood must be measured when it is “ranked and well stowed.” This means the wood is stacked neatly in a row with the pieces of wood parallel and touching with as few gaps as possible.
If, when measured, the width times the height, times the length equals 128 cubic feet, it is a cord of wood.
Prices per cord vary throughout the state. In Southern California, the range is from $230 to $480 per cord; in the Bay Area, $150 to $400; in the Central Valley, $100 to $275.
Consumers should be wary of terms such as “pallet,” “face cord,” “rack,” “rick,” “tier,” “pile” or “truck-load,” as these terms are illegal to use in the sale of firewood. If a seller uses such terms, consumers should be on alert for a possible problem.
Some wood dealers try to sell firewood from a pickup truck. Consumers should be on their guard, because a pickup cannot hold a cord of firewood. An 8-foot truck bed can hold one-half of a cord while a 6-foot bed can barely hold one-third of a cord.
Consumers are urged to get an invoice or delivery ticket that contains the name and address of the seller, the date purchased or delivered, the quantity purchased and the price.
The seller is required by law to provide this information in writing. Consumers may also want to take note of the license plate of the delivery vehicle.
If consumers believe they have not received the quantity ordered and paid for, they may call the seller to correct the problem.
Consumers should try to maintain the wood in the condition it was delivered, take a photograph and do not burn any.
If the seller can't or won't correct the problem, the next step would be contact with a local county weights and measures office as soon as possible at www.cdfa.ca.gov/exec/county/county_contacts.html or the California Department of Food and Agriculture's Division of Measurement Standards at 916-229-3000.
- Details
- Written by: Editor
“But the numbers were down about 29 percent from 1,384 sale s recorded the previous month,” said Peter Siegel, MBA, Founder and President of BizBen.com. “Sales activity was pretty strong earlier in November, but few escrow closings were scheduled for the last week because of the holiday.”
Most of the state’s large counties recorded fewer sales last month than in November 2009.
A total of 213 transactions were registered in Los Angeles County during the just-completed month, about 20 percent down from the 268 deals for the same period last year.
November-to-November declines also were recorded in Orange County (91 versus 97), San Diego County, (79 versus 91), and San Francisco, with 37 deals closed last month, compared to the 45 sold business figure from November of last year.
Sacramento County showed an increase to 42 deals last month, up from the 28 sales recorded in November of last year and the 26 transactions that closed in October 2010.
Santa Clara County figures are running pretty even at 51 deals in both October and November of this year, and 50 transactions in November 2009.
Siegel noted that the small increase over November 2009 sales statewide “shows the same pattern of cautious growth we see in other areas of the economy, including retail. We still need to see stronger fundamentals operating in the marketplace where businesses change hands.”
He added, “A decline in the value of small businesses, which is directly related to reduced earnings, is discouraging some owners from putting their companies on the market. They’re waiting for better times. Meanwhile, many buyers have an uphill battle getting purchase funds from lending sources so they can do deals.”
Long-term, Siegel said he expects the market to become much more robust. “The supply and demand are still there. Every day I learn about another buyer or seller or a broker who is using an innovative way of overcoming the obstacles presented by this difficult economy.”
The BizBen Index November report on the sale of small businesses in California, by county, (available at http://www.bizben.com/stats/stats-monthly-nov.php) is as follows: Alameda: 64, Amador: 3, Butte: 7, Contra Costa: 25, El Dorado: 6, Fresno: 31, Imperial: 1, Kern: 31, Los Angeles: 213, Madera: 1, Merced: 7, Monterey: 15, Napa: 2, Nevada: 4, Orange: 91, Placer: 14, Riverside: 41, Sacramento: 42, San Bernardino: 42, San Diego: 79, San Francisco: 37, San Joaquin: 17, San Luis Obispo: 4, San Mateo: 14, Santa Barbara: 20, Santa Clara: 51, Santa Cruz: 4, Shasta: 8, Solano: 17, Sonoma: 20, Stanislaus: 9, Sutter: 7, Tehama: 1, Tulare: 11, Tuolumne: 2, Ventura: 26, Yolo: 11.
BizBen.com is available via Twitter (bizbenlistings), FaceBook (bizbenbusinesslistings) and LinkedIn (in/bizbenlistings).