Recreation
‘Translocating’ mountain lions
Question: Recently in Sacramento, a mountain lion somehow ended up in the suburban neighborhood of Natomas. I read online that biologists tranquilized it and moved it out of the area. No one was hurt (including the lion) and it seems like a good ending to the story all the way around. But I noticed a lot of people online are commenting that it's actually against state policy to translocate a mountain lion. Can you explain why this lion was moved? (Marie)
Answer: Thank you for asking. "Translocation" is an often misunderstood concept. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife uses the term to describe the action of purposefully taking an animal out of suitable habitat in one area, and moving it to suitable habitat in another area. In many cases, this is done to encourage a struggling species to repopulate in a new area (for example, bighorn sheep herds or sage-grouse). Mountain lions are not threatened or endangered in California, and we do not currently "translocate" them in this sense.
There are times when wildlife take a wrong turn and end up in unsuitable habitat - as was the case of the lion that ended up in the Natomas neighborhood. When possible, CDFW staff can and do make the call to tranquilize an animal so it can be moved from the unsuitable habitat to the nearest suitable habitat (in the case of the lion in Natomas, the nearest suitable habitat was determined to be the Placer foothills). Providing an animal with the means to escape an unsafe situation is not considered "translocation," but rather relocation.
Catch and cook
Question: I have some questions on "catch and cook." If we are on an overnight fishing trip and want to cook what we've caught, is it legal for us to do so? Is catch and cook legal? If so, how do I show that the fish (if it's a species with a size limit) that I'm cooking is of legal size?
I spoke to some CDFW officials who told me that it is okay to cook our catch as long as they are fish that have no size limits. They also told me that for the species that do have size limits, we just need to keep a picture or video of the fish to show they are of legal size. Is that true? (KACA)
Answer: No, your interpretation is not correct. It is unlawful to possess either on a boat or to bring ashore any fish in such a condition that its size, weight or species cannot be determined (Fish and Game Code, sections 5508-5509). You must keep them in an identifiable condition until they have been prepared for immediate consumption.
The law is not intended to prevent anglers from eating their legal catch as this is fairly common on boats with cooking facilities, such as houseboats on lakes and larger boats at sea. You should only clean your catch immediately before it is eaten, and only clean the number of fish/invertebrates you plan to eat during that meal.
There are a number of fillet laws that allow you to clean many ocean finfish species (check the California Code of Regulations Title 14, section 27.65 on page 34 of the ocean regulations booklet.) All fillets must be in the condition listed unless they are being prepared for immediate consumption.
In inland waters, there are no provisions for filleting on a lake/reservoir. The possession of fillets in this situation could only occur if the fish is being prepared for immediate consumption. A photograph or video, just like a retained carcass in a bucket, cannot be established to belong to that specific fish. Remember that daily bag limits always apply whether the fish is on a stringer, in a live well or in your stomach after a meal. If you are at a campground or ashore, you could fillet your fish for cooking.
Showing photos or videos to a wildlife officer to prove what you have filleted will not suffice. If the officer has any questions as to what species the fish is or if they have any reason to believe that it may have been a species with size or species regulations, they will cite you under the two code sections mentioned before. The officers cannot measure a picture or be 100% certain that the photos/videos you provide are the same fish you have already filleted.
If you have a question for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, email
- Details
- Written by: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
VALLEJO, Calif. – On Saturday, March 30, Ashley Pyorre competed in the California Girls Middle School State Wrestling Championships and won a fifth place medal after going 4-2 with four pins in the 103-pound division.
She’s believed to be the first state medalist for the Terrace Middle School Vikings, girl or boy in any sport.
As one of the largest Girls Middle School Wrestling Tournaments with more than 220 girls entered, Ashley wrestled extremely well with her natural balance, strength and instincts, along with a handful of moves that kept her right in the mix with all of the top seasoned wrestlers. She only wrestles a few weeks a year, diversifying her time between other sports such as soccer and snowboarding.
As the tournament began, Ashley would takedown and pin hometown favorite Reigne Ramos of Vallejo in the first period. Then she would face the No. 3 seed and eventual third place medalist Ella Harper of Sacramento. The match was a close battle at 0-0 going into the second period. In the middle of the second period Harper would slip away with an escape point.
Now Ashley was behind 1-0 going into the third period. Harper took down and as Ashley was trying to turn the stalling opponent she was penalized a violation point for what they called an excessive elbow to the head during her power half. Now down 2-0 Ashley tried to force the turn, was reversed, but immediately got an escape, went in for a shot, but ran out of time and would go down 4 to 1.
In the first period of the consolation round Ashley would takedown and pin Lauren Agular of San Lorenzo. Next up Ashley got the takedown and pin in the first period of the Blood round against Elizabeth De Mars of Elk Grove.
Then in the consolation semifinals match Ashley was turning her opponent for back points, when she went to switch sides, got her arm caught and fell to the No. 4 seed and eventual fourth place medalist Mickayla Bridges of Modesto.
That loss really got to Ashley, because she knew she had her and was going on to get another crack at Harper, but it wasn’t to be and she had to get her head back together.
In the fifth place match Ashley came back with a vengeance against Isabelle Camarillo of Union City, taking her down and turning her for points and then turning and pinning her in the third period, winning the 5th place State medal.
As the medals were being handed out the tournament host said, “In my opinion this 103-pound division was the toughest in the tournament.”
- Details
- Written by: Rick Pyorre





How to resolve AdBlock issue?