NORTH COAST, Calif. — Authorities arrested two Lucerne women this week who they said were responsible for a series of vehicle burglaries in Ukiah.
Mendocino County Sheriff’s deputies arrested Elizabeth Arnold, 39, and Sarah Simon, 48, early Tuesday morning.
The agency said that at 12:42 a.m. Tuesday, deputies were dispatched to investigate two suspicious subjects entering people's vehicles in the 3000 block of Estrella Court in Ukiah.
Upon arrival at the scene, deputies immediately observed a female who was driving a vehicle at a slow speed with all of the lights turned off. The female was stopped by deputies and identified as Sarah Simon.
Deputies also observed another female hiding behind a nearby vehicle in the driveway of a residence, who was identified as Elizabeth Arnold.
Both Simon and Arnold were detained, and deputies began their investigation by canvassing the neighborhood.
The deputies located multiple vehicles in the area with the doors open. Deputies contacted the homeowners where the vehicles were parked and learned several items had been stolen from the vehicles.
A search of Arnold, Simon and their vehicle revealed numerous items that had just been stolen, the sheriff’s office said.
Simon was also in possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, and had an active warrant for her arrest out of Lake County for petty theft with two priors.
During their investigation, the deputies learned both Arnold and Simon were also suspects in similar thefts of numerous items taken from vehicles in the nearby neighborhoods of West Fork Estates and Lake Mendocino Estates, which occurred in the early morning hours of Feb. 18.
Sheriff’s detectives assisted with this investigation and gathered additional evidence and statements which led to the execution of search warrants for additional stolen property.
In all, authorities said investigators determined there were five victims of the Tuesday burglaries.
During the investigation, Simon was placed under arrest for her felony arrest warrant out of Lake County, along with charges of felony conspiracy, possession of paraphernalia and possession of a controlled substance.
Arnold was placed under arrest for felonies of conspiracy and grand theft.
Simon was subsequently booked into the Mendocino County Jail where she was to be held in lieu of $10,000 bail for the Lake County warrant and $15,000 bail for the current open charges.
Arnold was booked into the Mendocino County Jail where she was to be held in lieu of $15,000.00 bail.
Anyone with information related to this investigation and thefts is requested to contact the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office Dispatch Center at 707-463-4086 (option 1).
LAKEPORT, Calif. — The California Highway Patrol has issued a report on a wreck earlier this week that claimed the life of a Lakeport man.
The crash, which took place just before noon on Sunday, led to the death of 88-year-old Edmund Joseph Slevin.
The CHP’s Clear Lake Area office said that at 11:50 a.m. Sunday, Slevin was driving his Hyundai southbound on Lakeshore Boulevard south of Rainbow Drive at an unknown speed.
Amely Ballesteros, 21, of Lakeport was driving a Jeep at a stated speed of 30 to 35 miles per hour, traveling northbound on Lakeshore Boulevard north of Beach Lane, approaching Slevin’s vehicle.
She saw Slevin’s Hyundai drift across the roadway centerline towards oncoming traffic, narrowly missing the vehicle in front of her, the CHP said.
The left front corner of Slevin’s Hyundai struck the left side of Amely Ballesteros’ Jeep, causing the Jeep to spin about where it came to rest, on its wheels, facing a southwesterly direction in front of a residence, according to the CHP report.
The CHP said Slevin’s vehicle continued further onto the northbound shoulder towards a residence, where it came to rest against a water main, facing in a south-easterly direction.
Slevin was unresponsive at the scene and did not regain consciousness, the CHP reported.
The report said Slevin was transported to Sutter Lakeside for medical treatment. Emergency room staff at Sutter Lakeside ultimately exhausted efforts to revive him and pronounced him deceased just after 1 p.m., the CHP said.
The CHP report said Ballesteros was uninjured.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social.
This week, California completed its first phase of the new deliberative democracy platform, Engaged California.
Those who subscribed to participate in the first use case, focusing on Los Angeles fire recovery efforts, received invites to join the discussion.
Officials called this is a significant milestone in a brand-new program for the state of California.
Visitors to engaged.ca.gov will also find a new section of the website that informs survivors of the different phases in this process and where they can be involved. It sets a visual detail of the timeline and expectations for the outcome.
“The initial response from Californians has shown us that we need to create different options for how people interact with us. We’re now moving forward into a listening mode and bringing people together for a conversation that can help us change how we normally do things — which is exactly what Engaged California is supposed to do,” said Gov. Gavin Newsom.
This marks a major achievement in creating a new option for Californians to have their voices heard. People who opted into the conversation are now engaging with each other and starting to set the priorities for the deliberation. Invitations take participants into the space where they answer questions, can vote in favor of comments left by others, and respond to other comments. Participation in the space is anonymous and open for a limited time.
“Fire survivors are now actively communicating with us. And California is actively listening,” said California Government Operations Secretary Nick Maduros. “What we are seeing is the shaping of the conversation around recovery efforts from the people who are closest to the need.”
What is Engaged California?
Engaged California is a new platform that gives Californians a unique opportunity to share their thoughts and connect with other people on topics that are important to them.
It creates new opportunities for Californians to connect with their government to inform and shape policy through honest, respectful discussions.
The program was launched In February with the first use case focusing on the impacts of the Los Angeles wildfires.
Ongoing conversations help keep policies useful and up to date by reflecting the ideas and needs of the community, rather than solely relying on one round of feedback.
Engaged California represents a deep collaboration between California and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
"Carnegie California is grateful to be on the ground floor, providing our expertise to inform the development of California's deliberative democracy program,” said Ian Klaus, founding director of Carnegie California. "It is wonderful that California is committed to grounding this work in best practices from knowledge partners in the state and around the globe to improve public engagement and strengthen democracy with digital tools."
This program was modeled after the successful efforts led by Audrey Tang, Taiwan's first Minister of Digital Affairs.
Speaking on a panel at SXSW 2025, Tang highlighted how technology can enhance civic engagement. She pointed to California’s role in leading this shift in the United States.
“Just a couple of weeks ago, Governor Newsom of California announced Engaged California with the same idea about plural listening on a very urgent topic—of how to recover from the wildfire in Eaton and Palisades in LA, and more topics afterwards,” Tang said. “So, we're now seeing a new wave grounded in individual ideas that people have, and resonance people have with each other, without AI stepping in to replace a human's role in decision making."
The long-term goal is to create a sustainable model for deliberative democracy that can be used to discuss other significant issues in California.
Want to join?
Getting involved is simple, and your voice can make a real impact. And remember, this isn’t just a one-time input.
Engaged California is a platform for ongoing dialogue where your ideas are heard and shared.
Stay tuned and get ready to participate. Sign up now at engaged.ca.gov to join the conversation.
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — Lake County officials have continued to raise concerns about a new fire hazard map released by Cal Fire that has determined that thousands more acres of the county are at a higher fire threat.
On Feb. 10, Cal Fire released its new fire hazard severity zone map for “Local Responsibility Areas,” adding a total of 14,000 acres of Lake County land to the 'very high' fire hazard severity zone.
State law defines Local Responsibility Areas, or LRA, as “Areas of the state in which the financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires is the primary responsibility of a city, county, city and county, or district.”
The new map has entered a 90-day public comment period that began Feb. 12 and ends May 13.
Local governments are required to adopt the map by ordinance in 120 days; their deadline is July 1.
County and city officials, however, fear the new map could have major implications for the county, particularly in relation to fire insurance. They also have questioned the fact that the ratings on the map cannot be altered, regardless of local mitigation efforts.
This is not the first time that Lake County has dealt with concerns about the fire hazard severity zone map.
The Office of the State Fire Marshal is required by law to classify both the state and local responsibility areas into moderate, high and very high fire hazard severity zones.
In April 2024, the updated mapping for State Responsibility Areas went into effect, despite local opposition expressed during the public hearing at the Lake County Board of Supervisors meeting.
Then, in December, local officials — including supervisors, fire chiefs and city managers — were informed that the updated map for the LRA would soon be rolled out.
Regarding how federal lands might be impacted, the Bureau of Land Management said it coordinates with Cal Fire on wildland fire management throughout California and is jointly part of the California Wildfire & Forest Resilience Task Force, “working together to prevent catastrophic wildfires and manage healthy lands.”
“We defer to Cal Fire for more information about new fire hazard severity maps,” the agency told Lake County News about its involvement in the process.
‘Very high’ category significantly expanded
The release of the new LRA map marks its first update since 2011.
Compared to the 2011 version, this new map significantly expands the “very high” acreage in Lake County.
In Clearlake, the acreage rated as “very high” increases from 1,583 to 4,054 acres. In Lakeport, it rises from zero to 603 acres.
Meanwhile, unincorporated areas under county jurisdiction see the most dramatic jump, from just 5 acres to 10,881 acres.
Overall, the total acreage classified as "very high" has grown by 13,950 acres — from 1,588 to 15,538 acres — a total increase of approximately 878%.
In addition, the 2011 map was only required to show the “very high” category. The new map, however, also displays local areas rated moderate and high.
In December 2022, Cal Fire released an updated map for State Responsibility Areas or the SRA, classifying 366,812 acres in Lake County as "very high" fire hazard zones, accounting for 92% of the total acreage under SRA.
Lake County did not welcome it.
In January 2023, during a Cal Fire public hearing at a Lake County Board of Supervisors meeting, local officials, including supervisors and Lakeport Fire Chief Patrick Reitz, and the public voiced opposition, citing concerns about the map’s methodology and potential impacts on fire insurance.
Despite unanimous criticism during the meeting, Cal Fire proceeded with adoption in April 2024.
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara also claimed that the maps are intended to “drive local planning decisions, not insurance decisions.”
“Fires are real,” said District 2 Supervisor Bruno Sabatier, acknowledging the necessity for Lake County to mitigate fire risks. “So we need to do good work to prevent fires from happening.”
However, local officials remain concerned about the map’s impact on fire insurance availability and rates in the already strained local market, particularly given Lara's recent policy that allows insurance companies to utilize “catastrophic models’ in setting rates.
“It’s not pragmatic for people who are living here,” said Sabatier of the map. “This is gonna have a huge impact."
“The fear is that it's just going to make insurability in the city much more difficult,” said Clearlake City Manager Alan Flora.
While the public comment period is underway, local government and fire leaders also are raising concerns about the mandatory and restrictive adoption process of the map.
Local governments must adopt the map as is or with a higher hazard severity rating, regardless of public input or fire mitigation efforts.
“It's kind of the state jamming this down everybody's throat,” said Reitz before the map was rolled out during a Lakeport Fire District board meeting in January.
A Feb. 12 county press release confirmed that local jurisdictions must approve the map by ordinance before July 1. It also stated that state government code does not allow any adjustment to a lower rating in the map.
The public can now direct questions about the maps to the Office of the State Fire Marshal at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or by calling 916-633-7655.
Public comment can be submitted to the county and two city councils:
• City of Clearlake: 14050 Olympic Drive, Clearlake. Email comments that apply within the city of Clearlake to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call City Manager Alan Flora at 707-994-8201. • City of Lakeport: 225 Park St., Lakeport. Email comments that apply within the city of Lakeport to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call City Manager Kevin Ingram at 707-263-5615, Extension 102. • County of Lake: 255 N Forbes St., Lakeport, Third Floor, Community Development Department. Email comments for County Jurisdiction areas to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or call Director Mireya Turner at 707-263-2382.
Public comment will close on May 13, according to Lake County Community Development Director Mireya.
The Lake County Board of Supervisors, City Councils of Lakeport and Clearlake will also host public hearings on the map. Exact dates have not yet been announced.
Detailed maps for the three jurisdictions in Lake County can be found here. More information can be found on Cal Fire’s webpage, under the “Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map” tab.
Concerns raised over map’s modeling method
For the map makers, the fire hazard severity zone maps are intended to reduce fire threat by ensuring building code compliance.
According to Cal Fire, the maps assess fire hazard based on “the physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period.”
Such long-term projection does not consider mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire or fuel reduction efforts.
When asked if zone ratings could change based on such efforts, Jim McDougald, assistant deputy director of Cal Fire’s Community Wildfire Planning & Risk Reduction, said it’s unlikely.
“It looks at the long term fire hazard; it’s the landscape and what it looks like,” McDougald told Lake County News. “So very few things change the map.”
Significant changes, he explained, happen only when wildland is developed into urban space. “There can be small changes, but you don’t see drastic changes unless it’s been built out,” he said.
“The only important part is, when people build in the wild land, we want them to build the appropriate mitigations to protect their home and their investment, right?” he said of the map’s intent. “That's what the maps are designed to do.”
“It's designed for where there's a hazard and where you need to have these building mitigations or defensible space,” he added.
But for Supervisor Sabatier, the problem is that such work of mitigation “doesn’t have any impacts on this map,” he told Lake County News.
A brief discussion was brought up in the Clearlake City Council’s Feb. 20 meeting about Woodland Community College Lake County campus’ fire mitigation effort after suffering smoke damage from the Boyles Fire that started last September.
Mayor Russ Cremer said that the campus went on to remove all trees and overhangings within five feet of their structures.
But still, that didn’t change the rating on the map.
“They did an enormous amount of work removing vegetation. You would expect that maybe you would get some credit or benefit from this mapping process as a result of that mitigation work,” Flora said during the meeting. “It's not gonna happen.”
As for future updates for the map, McDougald said there is no fixed timeline but estimated it would be “at least five years” before another revision.
“It’s been a long time since we updated them,” said McDougald of the 14 years between now and 2011 when the LRA map was last updated.
Still, Sabatier finds it difficult to reconcile that the map projects fire behavior over decades but is updated far more frequently than every 30 to 50 years.
“If you're going to redo these maps every five years, then why don't you just model five years?” he said. “It would make sense to me to model until the next one.”
Worries over fire insurance
When asked if the insurance companies can make their policies based on the maps, McGourald said, “They’re not supposed to. No.”
He emphasized that the map was designed “strictly around building fire-safe homes — it’s what it's for.”
But local officials worry its real-world impact may extend beyond that intent.
“We knew that folks in the unincorporated area outside of these LRAs were already experiencing some pretty tragic increases, if not complete denial for their home insurance,” said Supervisor Sabatier during a phone interview with Lake County News.
“And this will have a much deeper impact in the residential areas especially,” he added of the new LRA map.
Lakeport City Manager Kevin Ingram pointed to Commissioner Lara’s new regulations announced in December that allow insurers using catastrophic modeling in their decision making.
The policy Ingram referred to is part of the commissioner’s regulation kit of “expanding coverage for Californians in wildfire-distressed areas” which goes “hand-in-hand with forward-looking wildfire catastrophe models that can better predict future rates,” the commissioner’s Dec. 30 press release stated.
The new rules allow insurers to incorporate wildfire catastrophe models into ratemaking, if they also expand coverage in underserved areas.
For Ingram, that means insurance companies can now “utilize a whole plethora of information such as the fire hazard severity mapping in their decision on setting rates,” he wrote in an email to Lake County News.
“We know that the insurance companies were using them,” said Reitz in a preliminary discussion about the map at the Lakeport city council meeting on Feb. 18.
“But now it is absolutely permitted,” he said.
The Department of Insurance has not responded to Lake County News’ multiple inquiries through emails and phone calls since February on the map’s impact on Lake County residents’ insurance options and rates.
An automated voice message when calling the department’s press communication number says, “For the health and safety of our employees, we have limited the number of staff on-site. This line is being regularly monitored and we will return messages.”
For Flora, it's important to “get the word out,” he said in the Clearlake City Council meeting where “very few people” were in the room.
“Unfortunately the community probably is not going to respond or care about this as much as they should until they get a cancellation notice of their insurance, which, if they do nothing, is going to happen,” Flora said.
Adopting the map: A restrictive mandate
Even with the current 90-day public comment period, local officials feel the process is little more than a formality.
For one, public comment won’t change the fact that the county and cities “must” adopt the map, as required by state law.
It’s not by choice, said Flora, who also used the word “restrictive” to describe the lack of flexibility in the map: “We can increase the severity zones, but we can’t decrease them.”
“It is frustrating to be able to do a lot of mitigation work that still does not impact these severity zones,” Flora added.
“If you have ‘moderate,’ you can make a claim — ‘actually, it’s not moderate, it should be high,’” said Sabatier of the rule that he found peculiar. “I don’t know who would ever do it.”
During the Feb. 18 Lakeport City Council meeting, Chief Reitz expressed his frustration.
“We can’t do anything about it,” Reitz said. “They give us a public hearing process that's lip service only, so I don't see why I need to couch my remarks, because the state has basically thrust this down our throats and told us that there's no grounds for appeal.”
When asked about the “appeal” process, “There’s no such thing as appeals,” McDougald of Cal Fire responded in a follow-up call, saying that it’s not a rule created by Cal Fire for the map.
“That’s in government code,” said McDougald, citing Government Code 51179 that restricts local jurisdictions’ adjustment to the rating.
‘Zone 0’ policy
Just before the map was rolled out, Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order on Feb. 6, directing Cal Fire to “accelerate” its work to adopt a new fire-prevention policy known as “Zone 0” which is tied to the updated LRA map.
Once implemented, Zone 0 will require both new and existing structures in “very high” fire hazard zones on the LRA map to maintain an “ember-resistant zone” within the immediate 5-feet of structures.
For Lake County, it will apply to any structures in the 15,538 acres classified as “very high” by the new map.
It means “no combustible materials within five feet of a home whether it's trees, grass, shrubs, or a fence, mulch, deck,” Flora explained at the Feb. 20 Clearlake City Council meeting. “So there's going to be some pretty significant impact.”
Ingram of Lakeport also expressed concerns at a Feb. 18 Lakeport City Council meeting, noting that it’s unclear how existing structures will meet the strict Zone 0 requirements.
While Ingram said the responsibility for inspections remains uncertain, Flora confirmed that local governments will handle enforcement.
“As the state likes to do, there’s going to be a number of additional regulations that come down,” Flora said during the Clearlake City Council meeting. “We have to enforce them; they are not going to do it.”
Email staff reporter Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Board of Supervisors will hold a special meeting this week with its department heads and administrative staff in which they are expected to discuss a proposal for a major change in the county administration’s leadership model.
The board will meet from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. Friday, March 21, at Robinson Rancheria, 1545 Highway 20 in Nice.
The meeting is open to the public.
However, unlike most board meetings, this special meeting and training workshop will not be recorded, televised or live-streamed, and will be in-person only.
Beginning at 9:15 a.m., the board and staff will discuss “organization effectiveness,” including next steps regarding the executive leadership model.
That discussion is expected to include a proposal to change the county leadership from a county administrative officer to a chief executive officer model.
Such an action could move overall responsibility for overseeing department heads from the board to that CEO, which would be a major shift in management and operations for the county.
The board and staff also are scheduled to discuss future focused governance and best practices, priority setting for the Vision 2028 review, as well review and discuss a procedure, protocol and rules manual.
The full agenda follows.
9 a.m.: Workshop Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Introductions and Comments by Chair Crandell
9:15 a.m.: Organizational Effectiveness Executive Leadership Model/ Next Steps Future Focused Governance/ Best Practices Priority Setting/ Vision 2028 Review
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social.
UPDATE: Just after 7:30 p.m. March 20, CPD reported that Matthew Vicchione has been located.
LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Clearlake Police Department is asking for the community’s help in locating two individuals.
The first is George Guardino, 15.
He is described as a white male juvenile, approximately 6 feet tall and 150 pounds, with red or brown buzz cut hair, brown eyes, and possibly wearing a white tank top and black checkered pajama bottoms.
The second case is that of 43-year-old Matthew Vicchione.
Matthew Vicchione. Courtesy photo. Vicchione was last seen in the area of College Access Road and Dam Road Extension.
He is described as a white male adult, 5 feet 9 inches tall and 160 pounds. He is bald with brown eyes.
Vicchione was last seen wearing a black jacket, blue jeans and tan boots.
If anyone has any information on George's whereabouts, please contact the Clearlake Police Department at 707-994-8251, Extension 1.
State officials reported that, as part of an enhanced focus in 2025 to combat the scourge of illegal fentanyl trafficking, in January and February the California National Guard seized 1,045 pounds and more than 650,000 pills containing fentanyl, with a street valuation of more than $6.8 million.
Through their Counter Drug Task Force operations, the Cal Guard Task Force members have been strategically deployed statewide, including at ports of entry, to combat transnational criminal organizations and trafficking illegal narcotics like fentanyl, in support of federal, state, and local law enforcement partners.
“By disrupting the trafficking of the 1,045 pounds of fentanyl so far this year, Cal Guard’s Counter Drug Task Force continues to save countless lives across our state. I cannot thank them enough for their support in keeping deadly fentanyl out of our communities,” said Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Service members helped confiscate 488 pounds of powder-laced fentanyl and 331,069 pills of this dangerous drug in February, adding to the efforts in January.
In addition, Cal Guard service members continue to transform drug prevention in elementary, middle, and high schools statewide through the Task Force’s Drug Demand Reduction Outreach program.
Since October 2024, servicemembers visited 112 schools across the state and engaged with 57,442 students.
By conducting in-person outreach and understanding students’ beliefs about their own health using a Health Belief Model, Cal Guard is implementing an impactful initiative in the fight against opioid abuse.
Latest laboratory testing from the federal Drug Enforcement Agency indicates five out of 10 pills tested in 2024 contain a potentially deadly dose of fentanyl, which is down from seven of 10 pills in 2023.
Fentanyl is primarily smuggled into the country by U.S. citizens through ports of entry.
In 2024, Governor Newsom doubled down on the deployment of the Cal Guard’s Counterdrug Task Force by more than doubling the number of service members supporting fentanyl interdiction, and seizing other drugs, at California ports of entry to nearly 400.
Cal Guard’s coordinated drug interdiction efforts in the state are funded in part by California’s $60 million investment over four years to expand Cal Guard’s work to prevent drug trafficking by transnational criminal organizations.
This adds to the governor’s efforts to address fentanyl within California, including by cracking down on fentanyl in communities across the state, including San Francisco.
Addressing the opioid crisis
The state has launched various initiatives in recent years to combat illicit opioids through the Governor’s Master Plan for Tackling the Fentanyl and Opioid Crisis, which provides a comprehensive framework to support overdose prevention efforts, hold the opioid pharmaceutical industry accountable, crack down on drug trafficking, and raise awareness about the dangers of opioids like fentanyl.
Recently, through funding designated by the governor in the 2022-23 budget to develop the Fentanyl Enforcement Program, the Department of Justice announced a significant fentanyl bust worth $55 million and leading to the arrest of three major fentanyl traffickers.
The Campus Opioid Act, signed by Gov. Newsom in 2022, requires that every public college campus in California distribute a federally approved opioid overdose reversal medication like naloxone, and include information about opioid overdoses in their orientation process.
Last year, Newsom also signed AB 2429, requiring that fentanyl education be included in high school health classes starting in the 2026-27 school year.
Serving as a one-stop tool for Californians seeking resources for prevention and treatment, the website opioids.ca.gov provides information on how California is working to hold Big Pharma and drug traffickers accountable in this crisis.
The public education campaign Facts Fight Fentanyl informs Californians about the dangers of fentanyl and how to prevent overdoses and deaths. This effort will provide critical information about fentanyl and life-saving tools such as naloxone.
Through the Naloxone Distribution Project, over-the-counter CalRx-branded naloxone is now available across the state. The CalRx-branded over-the-counter naloxone HCL nasal spray, 4 mg, is available for free to eligible organizations through the state and for sale for $24 per twin-pack through Amneal. Since 2018, there have been over 334,000 reversals reported from NDP naloxone since 2018.
LAKEPORT, Calif. — The Lake County Sheriff’s Office has identified a Lakeport man who died in a Sunday morning crash.
Authorities said Edmund Joseph Slevin, 88, was the wreck’s fatality.
Reports from the scene said Slevin was involved in a collision with another vehicle on Lakeshore Boulevard at Rainbow Road shortly before noon.
Slevin was reported to have been unresponsive by the time firefighters arrived at the scene.
Information about the cause of the crash has not been immediately available from the California Highway Patrol’s Clear Lake Area office.
Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social.
Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff (both D-Calif.) have joined 36 Democratic colleagues in expressing outrage at what they say are “reckless and illegal” firings the Trump Administration is carrying out in cutting in half the workforce of the U.S. Department of Education.
The senators said the actions by President Trump and Elon Musk are an attack on public education in America by closing offices and laying off 1,300 workers at the Department of Education.
They said it will cripple America’s education system and impact students in California and across the country.
California’s public education system, supported by the Department of Education, is the largest in the country. There are about 10,000 public schools in California serving over 5.8 million students.
If the department is dismantled, the nearly $8 billion in federal funding that California receives annually to support low-income students, students with disabilities, and more could be at risk.
California also has the most extensive higher education system in the nation, including the largest number of Pell Grant recipients who rely on Education Department staff to help them attend college.
Abolishing the Department of Education would have devastating impacts on California schools, students, faculty, communities and the economy, the group warned.
“At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, when 60 percent of people live paycheck to paycheck, millions of Americans cannot afford higher education, and 40 percent of our nation’s 4th graders and 33 percent of 8th graders read below basic proficiency, it is a national disgrace that the Trump Administration is attempting to illegally abolish the Department of Education and thus, undermine a high-quality education for our students,” wrote the senators.
The senators noted that these layoffs and closures will have devastating effects on the nation’s students, including by limiting the Department’s ability to guarantee that federal funding reaches communities that rely on it, ensure students can access federal financial aid, and uphold students’ civil rights.
Not even 24 hours after the staff reductions were announced, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, or FAFSA, experienced a glitch that prevented students and families from accessing the application. Education Department workers responsible for fixing it had reportedly been fired.
“[The layoffs] would also mean decreased enforcement of rights for children with disabilities and fewer resources for students from low-income backgrounds and children with disabilities, like the 26 million students from low-income backgrounds and over 100,000 public schools in every community across this country that rely on Title I funding; the 7.5 million students with disabilities who benefit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the 7 million students who receive Pell grants to help access higher education,” continued the senators.
“We will not stand by as you attempt to turn back the clock on education in this country through gutting the Department of Education,” concluded the senators. “Our nation’s public schools, colleges, and universities are preparing the next generation of America’s leaders—we must take steps to strengthen education in this country, not take a wrecking ball to the agency that exists to do so.”
California, 19 other states, and Washington, D.C. have sued the Trump Administration for these cuts and are pushing a federal judge to reinstate the 1,300 fired Education Department workers.
The letter to Secretary of Education Linda McMahon was led by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. In addition to Padilla, Schiff, and Sanders, the letter was also signed by senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Jack Reed (D-R.I.), Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Tina Smith (D-Minn.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Mark Warner (D-Va.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).
Last month, Sen. Padilla blasted President Trump’s nomination of Linda McMahon to lead the Department of Education, underscoring the enormous threat the Trump Administration poses to the education of millions of students in California and across the country.
Sen. Padilla joined Sen. Warren and his Senate colleagues in launching a probe into reports that Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, infiltrated the Department of Education and gained access to federal student loan data, which includes millions of borrowers’ personal information.
The senators sent a follow-up letter raising concerns about the Department of Education’s “woefully inadequate,” “misleading” response to their inquiry.
The full text of the letter is published below.
Dear Secretary McMahon:
We write to express our outrage that you, President Trump, and unelected billionaire Elon Musk are taking steps to abolish the Department of Education (“the Department”) and eliminate educational opportunities for millions of students across the country, something that 61 percent of Americans oppose. This most recently includes a 50 percent cut to the workforce, resulting in the termination of over 1,300 workers at the Department of Education, as well as the abrupt, last minute closure of all Department of Education buildings beginning at 6:00 PM on the same day that these terminations were announced.
At a time of massive income and wealth inequality, when 60 percent of people live paycheck to paycheck, millions of Americans cannot afford higher education, and 40 percent of our nation’s 4th graders and 33 percent of 8th graders read below basic proficiency,3 it is a national disgrace that the Trump Administration is attempting to illegally abolish the Department of Education and thus, undermine a high-quality education for our students.
As Secretary of Education, you are the foremost public servant responsible for carrying out the Department of Education’s mission to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. Despite that responsibility, your first act as Secretary was announcing it was your “final mission” to dismantle the Department of Education, fire the public servants who keep it running, and terminate opportunities for students in public schools, colleges, and universities across the country.
The false claims of financial savings by dismantling the Department of Education so that billionaires can receive huge tax breaks is bad public policy and morally reprehensible. The billionaires that are in charge of our federal government right now will not be harmed by these egregious attacks: wealthy families sending their children to elite, private schools will still be able to get a quality education even if every public school disappears in this country. But for working-class families, high-quality public education is an opportunity they rely on for their children to have a path to do well in life.
Defunding federal support for public education would result in either higher property taxes or decreased funding for public schools, including in rural areas. It would also mean decreased enforcement of rights for children with disabilities and fewer resources for students from low-income backgrounds and children with disabilities, like the 26 million students from low-income backgrounds and over 100,000 public schools in every community across this country that rely on Title I funding; the 7.5 million students with disabilities who benefit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, and the 7 million students who receive Pell grants to help access higher education.
It is undeniable that terminating 50 percent of the Department of Education’s workers will have harmful effects on public education in this country. The Department of Education already has the smallest staff of the 15 Cabinet agencies despite having the third largest discretionary budget, behind only the Departments of Defense and Health and Human Services. These reductions will have devastating impacts on our nation’s students and we are deeply concerned that without staff, the Department will be unable to fulfill critical functions, such as ensuring students can access federal financial aid, upholding students’ civil rights, and guaranteeing that federal funding reaches communities promptly and is well-spent. Not even 24 hours after the staff reductions were announced, the Free Application for Federal Financial Aid (FAFSA) experienced a glitch that prevented students and families from accessing the application, but the staff normally responsible for fixing those errors had reportedly been cut. The Department has also reportedly shuttered several regional offices responsible for investigating potential violations of students’ civil rights in local schools. We are deeply alarmed that cases will go uninvestigated and that students will be left in unsafe learning environments as a result.
The Trump Administration also says it wants to ‘return education back to the states.’ Let us be very clear—public education is already run by states and local school boards. While just 11 percent of public education is federally funded, the Department of Education has a necessary and irreplaceable responsibility to implement federal laws that ensure equal opportunity for all children in this country. These laws guarantee fundamental protections, such as ensuring that children with disabilities receive a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment, that students from low-income backgrounds and students of color will not be disproportionately taught by less experienced and qualified teachers, and that parents will receive information about their child’s academic achievement.
Without the Department of Education, there is no guarantee that states would uphold students’ civil and educational rights. Let us not forget that it was federal troops who protected the “Little Rock Nine” from a violent mob of segregationists when they integrated Central High School in the wake of the Brown v. Board U.S. Supreme Court decision. Not only was the state not going to provide this protection, but it was then-Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus who ordered the state’s National Guard to bar Black students from entering the school. Even today, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights regularly investigates and resolves complaints of student discrimination related to students’ race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability status.
We will not stand by as you attempt to turn back the clock on education in this country through gutting the Department of Education. Our nation’s public schools, colleges, and universities are preparing the next generation of America’s leaders—we must take steps to strengthen education in this country, not take a wrecking ball to the agency that exists to do so.
Millions of Californians will receive an average of $137 in credits on their April gas and electric bills.
The California Climate Credit — automatically applied to Californians’ bills every April and October — is a direct result of the state’s nation-leading Cap-and-Trade climate program that requires polluters to pay for climate action.
Since 2014, California households have already received an average of $1,120 in combined automatic April and October climate credits on their utility bills.
“Every year, our Cap-and-Trade program provides essential funding to California’s efforts to clean the air while also giving residents money back on their utility bills. Millions of California families will benefit from this relief,” said Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Since 2014, the state’s Cap-and-Trade program has delivered $10.9 billion in bill credits back to utility customers. This year, California will provide a total of $2.4 billion in residential credits – $1.4 billion for electric customers, $1 billion for natural gas customers, and an additional $122 million for small businesses.
How it works
The credits range from $35 to $259 for electricity bills – with most set to receive $56 to $81 – and approximately $54 to $87 on natural gas bills for residential customers of PG&E, San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Gas Company, and Southwest Gas. Californians can check how much their credit will be here.
Californians do not need to do anything to get the credit. The California Climate Credit comes from the State’s Cap-and-Trade Program managed by the California Air Resources Board. The credit on utility bills represents the consumer’s share of the payments from the State’s program.
In addition to utility bill credits, California’s Cap-and-Trade program has funded $28 billion in climate investments delivering more than half a million projects across the state, supporting 30,000 jobs and cutting millions of tons of carbon emissions.
The investments include a wide range of solutions such as putting affordable housing near job centers, building the nation’s first high-speed rail, and adding zero-emission transportation options in underserved communities.
NORTH COAST, Calif. — Following a series of social media posts that began last week in which a woman said her father has confessed to being a serial killer who worked in several states and around the North Coast region — including in Lake and Mendocino counties — the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office on Monday said it has been investigating the allegations.
The posts by Galina Trefil have popped up on various pages across Facebook as she has recounted her allegations about her father, 86-year-old Dr. Jon Charles Trefil.
Dr. Trefil, who is now in failing health, has reportedly told his daughter that he began killing in the 1950s and then “made it a habit” from 1965 to 1999.
“From 1965 onward, he admitted to murdering one person, give or take, per month. Female, male, old, young, and couples. The states involved are Illinois, California, Virginia, Oregon, and Idaho. The outside countries are Canada, France, the Netherlands, and along the Mexican boarder [sic]. Most killings occurred in California, with the specified counties being San Francisco, Marin, Alameda, Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma, and one unidentified county that shares the Northern Mendocino border,” Galina Trefil wrote.
In a followup post, she said one of the people her father claimed to have killed was 21-year-old Barry Kirk Pinder, found murdered at his campsite inside MacKerricher State Park just north of Fort Bragg on June 18, 1972.
In her comments, Galina Trefil alleged that the Fort Bragg Police Department, the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office and the Mendocino County District Attorney’s Office are all aware of her father’s confessions.
“This is the secret that the authorities in Mendocino County are not sharing with the public,” Galina Trefil wrote.
Lake County News reached out to the Lake County Sheriff’s Office about Galina Trefil’s post.
“Yes, we saw the post and are aware of the claims being made,” public information officer Lauren Berlinn told Lake County News in a Friday email. “The Mendocino Sheriff’s Office would likely be the best resource for more information if it is available.”
On Monday, the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office issued a statement in response to the allegations, explaining that it has been following up on Galina Trefil’s information for more than two years.
Later in the day, Galina Trefil made another Facebook post in which she named another alleged victim, William Flint Midgett, 37, of Charlottesville, Virginia.
The Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office statement, written by Capt. Quincy Cromer, explained that the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office learned about Galina Trefil’s social media posts about her father being a serial killer on March 14.
Authorities explain case involvement
“This situation was reported to the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office in January of 2023 after Trefil’s daughter reported to other local and regional law enforcement of her suspicions that her father is a serial killer,” Cromer said in the report.
Based on the referrals from other law enforcement agencies, Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office detectives spoke with an advocate of Trefil’s daughter, who also assisted in interviewing Trefil about his alleged crimes, Cromer said.
Recordings, scanned journals and other investigative materials were shared with the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office, which conducted investigations into the claims.
“Investigators met with Trefil’s daughter in February of 2023, who said her father spoke about murdering several people from the 1970s through the 1990s. Trefil’s daughter also provided a lengthy written statement to detectives, which was retained as evidence,” the report said.
“As Trefil, his daughter, and the advocate spent time together, Trefil’s daughter said her father spoke about these killings and the daughter began researching unsolved murders in Mendocino County. Trefil’s daughter suspected her father was responsible for a murder in the 1970s in Mendocino County, which she specifically questioned her father about. Per Trefil’s daughter, Trefil ultimately admitted to the unsolved murder in Mendocino County in the 1970s. Detectives also obtained pictures, copies of journal entries, and recordings from the meetings between Trefil, his daughter, and the advocate,” the report said.
To further investigate the unsolved murder from the 1970s in Mendocino County, Cromer said detectives researched that case and compared the information provided by Trefil’s daughter to the facts of the case.
Detectives learned there were numerous evidentiary items that were submitted for DNA analysis in 2006 to the Department of Justice, which resulted in an unknown male DNA source from the analyzed evidence.
Detectives determined there were some consistencies in the information provided by Trefil’s daughter and the unsolved homicide case from the 1970s so they sought a warrant to obtain Trefil’s DNA for comparison to the evidentiary items sent for testing.
In May of 2023, the search warrant was authorized by a judge in Mendocino County to obtain a DNA sample from Trefil for comparison to the DNA profile from the evidence items in the unsolved homicide from the 1970s. The DNA sample from Trefil was submitted to the California Department of Justice Bureau of Forensic Services and ultimately uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System, also known as CODIS.
In 2023, the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office received reports from the California Department of Justice regarding the comparison of Trefil’s DNA profile to the evidence in the unsolved murder case from the 1970s. Trefil’s DNA did not match the unknown male contributor DNA profile from the unsolved 1970s murder investigation.
The Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office was also informed by the Department of Justice that Trefil’s DNA profile was uploaded into CODIS for routine and regular comparisons to DNA profiles uploaded from unsolved cases.
As of the publication of the Monday report, Cromer said the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office has never been informed of Trefil’s DNA profile being a match or potential match to any evidentiary items submitted to CODIS.
Information from Trefil’s daughter also alleged her father buried numerous people he murdered at a cabin in Comptche. Cromer said the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office searched the property and cabin and were unable to locate any evidence to substantiate these claims or of possible human remains or burial sites on the property in Comptche.
“The Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office is aware that Trefil’s daughter referenced other serial killers identified by her father, but these inferences were not substantiated by detectives,” Cromer said. “The Sheriff’s Office has been unable to substantiate the claims of the other individuals alleged to be serial killers or their involvement with homicides in Mendocino County.”
Cromer said the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office has examined the scanned copies of Trefil’s diaries and journals, but did not locate any expressed confessions to any murders.
Galina Trefil informed the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office and submitted her DNA and Trefil’s DNA to genealogical / ancestry sites, but Cromer said the Sheriff’s Office has never been informed of any investigative leads from these efforts or from other agencies investigating these claims.
“The Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office has and will continue to investigate crimes associated with Trefil or allegations that he was a serial killer in Mendocino County,” Cromer said. “The Sheriff’s Office has not interviewed Trefil directly regarding these allegations due to his fragile medical state and information provided by his family that he will not cooperate with law enforcement. When legally justified and supported by probable cause, the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office will continue to investigate this matter.”
Anyone with information regarding this investigation is requested to contact the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office at 707-463-4086 (option 1). Information can also be provided anonymously by calling the non-emergency tip line at 707-234-2100.
The text of Galina Trefil’s social media posts is included below.
March 13
My name is Galina. For so many years now, I have lived a double life; carried an impossible secret. This is not a joke. This is the cold reality, which has been strictly on a need-to-know basis. Now everyone needs to know. I am the daughter of a serial killer--a serial killer who knew the identities of two other uncaught serial sex killers, Michael Fries and Julia Strnad Houser. Dr. Jon Charles Trefil, my father, has admitted for almost a decade, giving a consistent story, to being a serial killer ON TAPE, graphically. FBPD, the Sheriff's Department, the Mendocino County DA's Office, they are all aware of his confessions. This is the secret that the authorities in Mendocino County are not sharing with the public. At this point, Jon is 86 years old. He's admitted to being a serial killer to roughly over a dozen people. He's asked repeatedly if only someone, some authority, would take him back to the dump sites where he put the bodies. He's promised that he will point to where the bodies are if police will only take him. They haven't been willing to do so, and he's remained, while bedridden, still free. He wants to tell his story. He actually wants to go public with his crimes. He's given his blessing for me to do so in his stead. Though, at times, he's also promised to fake being crazy if he's actually arrested. I, his daughter, have been asked by law enforcement how old he is, and I respond to them, "Well, he's almost a decade older than when I first contacted law enforcement." I have devoted my life to bringing Jon to justice. At this point, the DA's office has dozens of hours of him discussing his murders in intense detail. How he kidnapped. Who he kidnapped. How he kept victims prisoner, sometimes for weeks at a time before killing them. How he tortured. How he killed. Though he said that he began killing in the 1950s, he only really made it a habit from the summer of 1965 to approximately 1999. From 1965 onward, he admitted to murdering one person, give or take, per month. Female, male, old, young, and couples. The states involved are Illinois, California, Virginia, Oregon, and Idaho. The outside countries are Canada, France, the Netherlands, and along the Mexican boarder. Most killings occurred in California, with the specified counties being San Francisco, Marin, Alameda, Lake, Mendocino, Sonoma, and one unidentified county that shares the Northern Mendocino border. The fact that he's 86 should not matter in this case. There is no statute of limitations on murder, and most importantly he can give closure by saying where the bodies. He murdered my grandfather and laughed about killing two of my great-grandparents. He murdered multiple other people that, as a small child, I met back in the early 1980s. When I realized that he was a serial killer in January of 2012, I knew that he'd gone under the radar. If I let it happen, he would probably never be caught. Instead, I decided to devote the next 13 years of my life to building a case for the prosecution, so that the families of the dead could have the justice that they so deserve. The families deserve the opportunity to bury their daughters and sons; the opportunity while my father is still alive that they may stand in a courtroom and give an impact statement. I have contacted every jurisdiction wherein Jon admitted to murder. I have spoken to and given lengthy interviews with law enforcement over 40 times. I have provided DNA samples to law enforcement. At great personal physical risk, I retrieved my father's diaries, wherein he discusses some of the murders. To date, law enforcement hasn't even been willing to read those diaries. I got two of the murder weapons, including a vial of strychnine that Jon used to keep in his medical bag. No one's been willing to take it into custody. Last year, I was able to convince my father to cough up a few of the specific gravesite locations. The bodies of undiscovered victims are located at several places on "13 Curves" on HWY 20--mainly between the 4.5 to 5 mile marker. Also on the Comptche-Ukiah Road, Jon's Albion property, and at a murder cabin in Comptche. He's acknowledged two other murder cabins, located in Westport and Boonville. I asked law enforcement to put a wire on me. To date, they have not been willing to put a wire on me. I have been told that other, more recent cases, take precedent over cold cases. They took Jon's DNA, but have not been willing to put it, or my own volunteered DNA, into CODIS. Over the years, I built a posse, consisting mainly of seven key people, with an additional dozen or so helpers, who have also devoted themselves to bringing Jon Trefil to justice. Pure warriors, and the strain has weighed in on all of them. The time has come to go public though. I am asking the Mendocino County community for help. My father has repeatedly said that there were many victims who actually got away, some of whom were his patients. Hitchhikers, mostly picked up from the Willits junction, and tourists, were his main victims in Mendocino County, he said. He knew that they wouldn't be missed. IF YOU HAVE INFORMATION, PLEASE GO TO THE MENDOCINO COUNTY AUTHORITIES. I'm afraid that, given the lack of DNA analysis, this case absolutely will not be solved without the other surviving victims being willing to come forward. Thank you. Please share.
March 17
My name is Galina. I'm the daughter of a serial killer, Jon Charles Trefil. One of the murders that my father admitted to was that of Barry Kirk Pinder. This is one of the rare murders that Jon described in vivid detail in front of both me and Athena Bolton, who now works at the DA's Office. In 1974, John claimed that he went to MacKerricher State Park. Whether this was with the intention to stay at the park or murder someone, I don't know. John spent a lot of time camping out on beaches, in the woods; at reservoirs. In addition to hitchhikers, John claimed that a large number of his victims were out-of-area campers that would set up camp far back in the woods; poor people that had stayed away from campgrounds in order to save money. (There was a lot of that going on in the 1960s and 1970s of Mendocino County.) I do remember vaguely him taking me to campgrounds when I was very little, maybe four or five. He would disappear, leaving me to walk around by myself. I'd wait hours, not knowing when he'd be back. John later told me that he decided killing at MacKerricher was definitely a bad idea because it was far too populated and could easily have resulted in him getting caught. On this particular occasion in 1974, John stated that he was at the campground with a buddy of his: John Shandel. Shandel was a known figure in the construction business. According to John's story, there was some degree of tree-trimming or removal Shandel was providing in the area when this murder happened. The two men were interacting with Pinder. Both Johns were drunk. At some point, John claimed that Shandel attempted a physically intimate moment with Pinder. I do not recall if John Trefil said that Shandel was present for what happened next or not. The DA's Office has the tapes. John claimed to be very angry about the attempted intimacy between Shandel and Pinder, and thereafter because of it beat Pinder to death. At no point did John claim any degree of bodily contact with Pinder. It was John's confession to Pinder's murder which resulted in the Mendocino County Sheriff's Department getting a warrant for John's DNA. I was present for that. I will never forget how pissed off John looked when Det. Logan repeatedly called John "Mr. Trefil," rather than "Dr. Trefil." The DNA did not come back as tying John to the scene, but...it wouldn't. John never claimed to have touched Pinder with his body, or in any other way, left DNA at the scene. The story of John's interaction with Pinder could have been confirmed by John Shandel, but I was told that the Sheriff's Department had stated that Shandel was already dead and could not be questioned. They were wrong. Shandel didn't die for at least six months after the DNA was taken. So far as I'm aware, Shandel was never questioned at all. This was so botched and the Pinder family still has no justice.
March 17
My name is Galina. I'm the daughter of a serial killer and I need your help. I understand that law enforcement has officially put out a statement that there is no actual evidence in the diaries of murder. I am now going to share the name of one my father's victims. I had no intention to make specific victims' names public because it will always be my hope that law enforcement will spare the families that public dose of awful and inform them privately in an in-person safe space. That not necessarily being that case changes things. I first contact Charlottesville PD almost a decade ago to share the information that John's diary said a patient named "Midgett" died because of him in Virginia, 1979. I was told by PD that this information was too vague in order to discover the victim--Midgett's--identity. I was blown off. Well, ancestry.com publishes the death certificates of Virginia residents. I was able to find out exactly who "Midgett" is, by the date of death and the fact that he died in the hospital wherein John worked in a position of power. Figuring this out wasn't even hard! William Flint Midgett, age 37. Death ruled of natural causes. John stressed that, whenever possible, he didn't kill his own patients, but rather those of other doctors, so if anything was discovered to be amiss, the other doctor would receive the blame; not him. William Flint Midgett was apparently an exception to the rule. I shouldn't be having to do this research. My posse should not be having to do this research. You the public shouldn't be having to do this research. I'm doing it, and now a lot of you are too, because it's the right thing to do. I was advised by Det. Sam Logan from the Mendocino County Sheriff's Department to allow Athena Bolton, (who now works at the DA's Office,) to scan my father's diaries. I complied with the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office. I did what I was told. I handed them over. Saying they are of no evidentiary value baffles me. Please share.
How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
