How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
News
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
At its monthly meeting on July 28, the commission’s agenda included a discussion of the zoning ordinance update, following a presentation by Gary Price, the city’s consultant.
The main point of concern for numerous community members involved proposed changes to residential and institutional uses allowed by zones in Section 18-18.020.
On page 57 of the document, it addresses livestock density, allowing the raising of livestock, “including but not limited to sheep, goats, horses, mules and swine. The total number of animals shall not exceed one (1) mature animal per acre except in the case of newborns still with their mother. Newborns up to the weaning age still with their mother shall not be considered a part of this calculation.”
It also allows for raising of poultry or fowl providing that there are not more than five birds
per half an acre and the total does not exceed fifty birds.
City Manager Alan Flora told Lake County News that the proposed new densities allow for about half as much livestock as currently allowed under city zoning rules.
Many community members submitted comments on those proposed changes on the city’s Town Hall webpage as well as via letters and emails.
On the Town Hall page, Anthony Myrick wrote, “Many people are raising gardens and livestock to get by in this tough economy.” He said chickens are an important part of people’s pantry, with FFA and 4-H being an integral part of the culture in this rural community.
Robin Helton wrote, “Regarding poultry in city limits … in the poorest county something as simple as a few backyard chickens and a garden … can ensure a small but vital food security … as well as being a wonderful learning experience for our youth .... if the poultry does not constitute a clear nuisance … I believe it would behoove the council to allow this .... taking that away from people in such troubling economic and health crisis is counterproductive and contrary to the tradition of lake county strong … allow people this small security .. allow them to stand prouder, more compassionate and self reliant.”
Athena Holbrook posted, “This is a very poor county and many people have chickens and gardens to make ends meet. I've been disabled for over a year and this is how I feed my family. I am teaching my daughter how to be self sufficient by raising and growing her own food. I pay my taxes and I own my home. People can have several cats and dogs but not a few chickens for eggs? … This won't go over well for this rural area. I'm greatly opposed!”
Other comments, some of them coming from writers who did not include their names, talked about having purchased homes in Clearlake because they believed it was farm-friendly, and also offered support for FFA and 4-H.
Support for farm animals in the city wasn’t unanimous. One comment from an anonymous writer noted, “happy healthy chickens do not belong in a city, certainly not any space smaller than 1/2 acre, should be a full acre.”
Tim and Amanda Celli and their three children have raised cattle, pigs, goats, sheep, chickens, and turkeys on their acreage in a rural part of the city, and they registered their opposition to the new rules in a letter to the commission.
Issues they raised included their belief that the limitation would be detrimental to the health and safety of livestock, which are social animals; the impacts on families who are lower on the economic scale; the value of livestock in reducing carbon footprint and promoting a healthy lifestyle for families; and the support that those who raise livestock give to local businesses.
“In addition to self-sustainability, having livestock and poultry/foul provide an educational experience and family time that is not comparable to another experience. Being involved with agriculture animals teaches children at an early age empathy, commitment, patience, responsibility, reliability, and the value of hard work. Animal caretaking is [a] great way to spend time as a family and takes attention away from video games and smart phones,” the Cellis wrote.
Commissioners agree to reconsider proposed changes
After reading and hearing the public input, the planning commissioners made clear they were in favor of doing more work and taking the comments into account. Commissioner Lisa Wilson also said she was in favor of bringing city zoning rules more in line with the county’s.
Commissioner Erin McCarrick, noting the large amount of community input, asked how to get more feedback to staff.
Flora said the city could do more targeted outreach and even have a town hall.
Commission Vice Chair Kathryn Fitts said a lot of residents of the Burns Valley area have livestock and that they needed to look at the matter, noting she felt the proposed rules were “pretty restrictive.”
Commissioner Robert Coker said a lot of people in the city who live in the low-density R1 residential zoning district – which it was reported during the discussion has a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet – have chickens, and limiting them to four chickens is not enough for a family of four to survive.
Chair Richard Bean asked the staff if the city had sought anyone with expertise to consult on the proposed rules.
Flora said there are many examples based on different cities, and he was looking at an extensive study of such rules by a national planning association, so he didn’t think they needed to bring in an agricultural consultant.
What they did need, he said, is to have a consensus from the commission on whether they wanted it to be an agricultural community.
He said some places give restrictions on chickens, construction standards and setbacks. “We could go down that route but I’m hoping that we don’t,” Flora said, adding that he wanted to trust the community to do it right and follow up with the troublemakers.
Price said the city could have a broadened description of what it had before, which he said was working, with no one complaining about it.
“It sure gets us through it and if it doesn’t work, we’ll go back and revisit it,” he said.
Since it seems to have been working in the past, “for us to come back and try to change it, maybe that wasn’t such a good idea,” Price said.
Bean asked where staff got the draft section. Price said it was based on other areas he’s worked, including San Luis Obispo. “Lake County’s unique,” Price acknowledged.
Bean said he agreed that the existing regulations seem to be working. He asked if existing zoning would be grandfathered in if it were to be changed.
Flora said that, in general, after zoning changes existing situations are considered “legal nonconforming” until people come back for additional use permits, at which point they would have to come into compliance with the new rules.
Ultimately, the commission reached consensus to allow for staff to go back and do some additional work on the zoning ordinance changes, especially animal husbandry, which Flora said needed feedback.
At Flora’s request, the commission continued the public hearing to 6 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 25.
Flora told Lake County News this week that the city will be circulating a new draft of the zoning regulations and doing some type of virtual town hall.
“We should have something out early next week,” he said.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Christopher Lee Knittel, 42, and Suny Marshall Knittel, 8, both of Olivehurst, died of their injuries from the wreck, Lt. Corey Paulich said.
The California Highway Patrol’s Clear Lake Area office said the crash occurred shortly after 10 p.m. Saturday about five miles west of Walker Ridge Road.
Christopher Knittel was driving his 2018 Harley Davidson motorcycle westbound on Highway 20 at an unknown speed, with the boy riding behind him, when he lost control as he approached a right-hand curve in the road, according to the CHP report.
The motorcycle crossed into the oncoming lane and collided head-on with a 2016 Mazda CX5 being driven eastbound at 55 miles per hour by Stockton resident Andrea Bales, the CHP said.
The CHP said Christopher Knittel died at the scene while the child died later at Adventist Health Clear Lake.
Bales had major injuries and also was transported to Adventist Health Clear Lake, the CHP said.
The crash remains under investigation.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Elizabeth Larson
The following dogs are ready for adoption or foster.
‘Bella’
“Bella” is a female American Bully mix.
She has a short beige and tan coat.
She is dog No. 3537.
‘Diesel’
“Diesel” is a male border collie mix with a black and white coat.
He is dog No. 4023.
‘Isis’
“Isis” is a female American Staffordshire Terrier mix with a brindle and white coat.
She is dog No. 3732.
‘Lady’
“Lady” is a female German Shepherd mix.
She has been spayed.
She is dog No. 3683.
‘Popeye’
“Popeye” is a male Boston Terrier mix with a short brown and white coat.
He is dog No. 4081.
‘Wilbur’
“Wilbur” is a male American Bully mix with a short gray and white coat.
He is dog No. 3999.
Clearlake Animal Control’s shelter is located at 6820 Old Highway 53, off Airport Road.
Hours of operation are noon to 4 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday. The shelter is closed Sundays, Mondays and major holidays; the shelter offers appointments on the days it’s closed to accommodate people.
Call the Clearlake Animal Control shelter at 707-273-9440, or email
Visit Clearlake Animal Control on Facebook or at the city’s website.
Email Elizabeth Larson at
- Details
- Written by: Lake County News reports
The assessment uses the best available science and focuses on capturing current conditions and changes on the national forests and grasslands.
It provides recommendations on how the Forest Service could address the challenges facing forests, grasslands and communities in the plans that govern how land management decisions are made.
"The release of this assessment gives our region the data and scientific analysis to make future well-informed, landscape-level decisions that benefit our six northern forests," said Randy Moore, regional forester for the Pacific Southwest Region in California. "Furthermore, we're now able to move forward and prepare for updating land management plans to provide essential commodities and recreational opportunities, manage and reduce risk from wildfires through vegetative management and other proactive landscape efforts, provide clean air, water and habitat for plants and animals, and preserve our cultural resources, for present and future generations."
The Forest Service and other federal land management agencies are required by law to develop plans that guide the long-term management of public lands.
These plans are developed using public input and the best available science. They establish priorities for land managers and provide strategic direction for how the plan area is to be managed for a period of ten years or more. They may be periodically amended or revised entirely to address changing conditions or priorities.
"This assessment will make it more efficient to modernize our land management plans and reflect the new science, and changes to social, economic, and ecological conditions across this region," said Glenn Casamassa, regional forester for the Pacific Northwest Region in Oregon and Washington. "It will also preserve the tenets of the Northwest Forest Plan that are working well, so that work can continue effectively and efficiently."
The Northwest Forest Plan covers nearly 25 million acres of federally managed land in Oregon, Washington and northern California focusing on managing the entire landscape for long-term social and economic stability.
The Bioregional Assessment is not a decision document and does not impact current forest management. Instead, it will be used to shape ongoing engagement with stakeholders, state, county, tribal governments and Forest Service staff as they prepare for the next steps in the planning process together.