How to resolve AdBlock issue? 
Opinion
Vote for Shanda Harry.
Don't vote for Don Anderson as Lake County judge. Here's why …
Really? Don quotes in his mission statement, "As Lake County’s District Attorney I believe the importance is not winning a case but seeing that justice is served.”
You allowed a non-crime to be prosecuted that wasn't even a crime and destroyed my businesses (I’m in the process of rebuilding Neasham Insurance Agency), family and my life. You never even had the compassion or empathy to apologize.
The California Supreme Court thought the case was so ridiculous that when the attorney general tried to appeal the appellate courts decision after they overturned and reversed it in full 3-0 they wouldn't even hear it. If my case would of stood the "free enterprise system" would of been destroyed.
Besides making my client over $42,000 on her annuitization value on a $175,000 investment in 2.5 years you charged me with larceny because I should have known my client had the onset of dementia. Really, Don?
The bank (Mendocino Savings Bank) sold her a CD at the same time she bought the annuity and you didn't prosecute them. You're aware of that right? It's called a double standard. Also, if I would have known she had the onset of dementia I wouldn't of helped her.
The court also forgot the intent part in the jury instruction which violated my constitutional rights (how is it even possible that happened? I've heard the last time that happened was five and a half years ago and according to my source he was guilty and let go free), and your department just happened to find an audio tape the day before closing arguments where the client said herself two months after the sale she bought the annuity for tax purposes and no one forced her to do it, and she claimed she did it by her own free will and choice. I have the DA report (dated in April. She bought the annuity in February of the same year). That's proof again it should of never gone to trial.
Why did your department withhold that, and the judge allowed the jury to see a video of her out of her mind three years after the sale. Don't you think that would impeach the jurors, Don?
You, the judge and the Department of Insurance should of publicly apologized to me and still should and make it very clear to the community/public it was never a crime in the first place but you didn't. You've destroyed my businesses, and now my family and I had to file personal and business bankruptcy. Instead you just swept it under the carpet like I was a piece of trash.
You do realize if you or one of your relatives ever sold one of their used cars to a neighbor, TV, stereo, camera, computer, a new car, boat, doing a demented person’s taxes, taking a home in collateral for a bail bond, an attorney taking someone's money to represent them in a civil matter, setting up a living trust, selling someone a home, or anything over $950 the state could of come back and arrest you up to three years later and charge you with larceny if they determined your client had the onset of dementia/Alzheimer's if my case would of stood? Really? She wasn't even conserved until three years after the sale.
Do you still think Lake County residents want you to potentially be their judge?
Glenn Neasham lives in Hidden Valley Lake, Calif.
Don't vote for Don Anderson as Lake County judge. Here's why …
Really? Don quotes in his mission statement, "As Lake County’s District Attorney I believe the importance is not winning a case but seeing that justice is served.”
You allowed a non-crime to be prosecuted that wasn't even a crime and destroyed my businesses (I’m in the process of rebuilding Neasham Insurance Agency), family and my life. You never even had the compassion or empathy to apologize.
The California Supreme Court thought the case was so ridiculous that when the attorney general tried to appeal the appellate courts decision after they overturned and reversed it in full 3-0 they wouldn't even hear it. If my case would of stood the "free enterprise system" would of been destroyed.
Besides making my client over $42,000 on her annuitization value on a $175,000 investment in 2.5 years you charged me with larceny because I should have known my client had the onset of dementia. Really, Don?
The bank (Mendocino Savings Bank) sold her a CD at the same time she bought the annuity and you didn't prosecute them. You're aware of that right? It's called a double standard. Also, if I would have known she had the onset of dementia I wouldn't of helped her.
The court also forgot the intent part in the jury instruction which violated my constitutional rights (how is it even possible that happened? I've heard the last time that happened was five and a half years ago and according to my source he was guilty and let go free), and your department just happened to find an audio tape the day before closing arguments where the client said herself two months after the sale she bought the annuity for tax purposes and no one forced her to do it, and she claimed she did it by her own free will and choice. I have the DA report (dated in April. She bought the annuity in February of the same year). That's proof again it should of never gone to trial.
Why did your department withhold that, and the judge allowed the jury to see a video of her out of her mind three years after the sale. Don't you think that would impeach the jurors, Don?
You, the judge and the Department of Insurance should of publicly apologized to me and still should and make it very clear to the community/public it was never a crime in the first place but you didn't. You've destroyed my businesses, and now my family and I had to file personal and business bankruptcy. Instead you just swept it under the carpet like I was a piece of trash.
You do realize if you or one of your relatives ever sold one of their used cars to a neighbor, TV, stereo, camera, computer, a new car, boat, doing a demented person’s taxes, taking a home in collateral for a bail bond, an attorney taking someone's money to represent them in a civil matter, setting up a living trust, selling someone a home, or anything over $950 the state could of come back and arrest you up to three years later and charge you with larceny if they determined your client had the onset of dementia/Alzheimer's if my case would of stood? Really? She wasn't even conserved until three years after the sale.
Do you still think Lake County residents want you to potentially be their judge?
Glenn Neasham lives in Hidden Valley Lake, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: Glenn Neasham
During the winter of 2014 I was approached by then-Lakeport Unified School District Superintendent Erin Hagberg who asked for my support of a proposed bond issue. She told me it was for a new library/computer center and a new swimming pool.
I told her I believed that the last bond issue to build what we now call the “MAC” had been partially diverted to help build a new superintendent’s office that wasn’t on the bond list.
She assured me that the new bond proceeds would only be used for the library/computer center and a new swimming pool.
I said to her “no bait and switch” – “no hanky-panky” – and she assured me there would be no bait and switch.
I agreed to let her use my name. I went around my neighborhood to convince people to vote for the library/computer center and swimming pool. I believe I secured many votes for the bond.
Now the school board tells us that they have spent $4.2 million on a new food service and culinary arts kitchen and cafeteria.
I understand the item was not on the posted agenda when it was approved. A review of the bond project list that we all voted on does not reveal a “culinary arts kitchen” only a ”food service dining area.”
When the board’s misspending is combined with the library/computer center now under construction, the Board of Trustees tells us that there is not enough money to build the swimming pool. They hope to acquire other uncertain state funding in the future years to build the pool.
While the current Board of Trustees members are nice people, who are well-intentioned, they have not displayed the ability to budget, prioritize or respect the desire of the voters. It’s time to elect new board members who have the courage and critical thinking ability to not be misled by nonelected advisors and build the pool.
I am voting for Carly Alvord, Dan Buffalo and Jen Hanson for the Lakeport Unified School District Board of Trustees.
Bob Bridges lives in Lakeport, Calif.
I told her I believed that the last bond issue to build what we now call the “MAC” had been partially diverted to help build a new superintendent’s office that wasn’t on the bond list.
She assured me that the new bond proceeds would only be used for the library/computer center and a new swimming pool.
I said to her “no bait and switch” – “no hanky-panky” – and she assured me there would be no bait and switch.
I agreed to let her use my name. I went around my neighborhood to convince people to vote for the library/computer center and swimming pool. I believe I secured many votes for the bond.
Now the school board tells us that they have spent $4.2 million on a new food service and culinary arts kitchen and cafeteria.
I understand the item was not on the posted agenda when it was approved. A review of the bond project list that we all voted on does not reveal a “culinary arts kitchen” only a ”food service dining area.”
When the board’s misspending is combined with the library/computer center now under construction, the Board of Trustees tells us that there is not enough money to build the swimming pool. They hope to acquire other uncertain state funding in the future years to build the pool.
While the current Board of Trustees members are nice people, who are well-intentioned, they have not displayed the ability to budget, prioritize or respect the desire of the voters. It’s time to elect new board members who have the courage and critical thinking ability to not be misled by nonelected advisors and build the pool.
I am voting for Carly Alvord, Dan Buffalo and Jen Hanson for the Lakeport Unified School District Board of Trustees.
Bob Bridges lives in Lakeport, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: Bob Bridges
With the development of recent events directly linked to the school board elections, and having attended the Sept. 6 Lakeport Unified School Board meeting, I feel that I must speak up and say something.
I have had my own children graduate from Clear Lake High School and currently have grandchildren attending both Lakeport Elementary School and Terrace Middle School. I chose to attend the last LUSD Board meeting to hear both sides of the pool issue and to get a better sense of how our schools are currently operating. My family and I have always felt that our schools are strong and have provided support to our children.
I was glad that I attended the last LUSD Board meeting as it provided me with information on where I could start doing my own research, as both sides seem to be saying something different around similar topics. After my initial research, I feel even stronger that our current LUSD Board, the school administration and staff have the best interest of all of our students. It is unfortunate that the candidates that are running against our current board members are not being upfront on the real issues, but choose to lead with emotion and partial facts.
It seems like there are three main platforms that Carly Alvord, Dan Buffalo and Jennifer Hanson are running off of: 1. School safety; 2. Teacher retention; and 3. Mismanagement of bond funds, primarily for pool construction. I might be overgeneralizing these, but from my social interactions, I have narrowed it down to these three.
Over the past month, my friends and family have experienced excessive pressure from the Alvord, Buffalo, Hanson team; pushing to place campaign signs in their yards, being shown pictures of classroom destruction from last year at public meet and greet events, and sharing their views stating that our schools need to make sure that the special education children are not placed in the same classroom with the general education students as it may cause undue disruptions. All of which is strengthening the support for our current LUSD Board members in my opinion.
Where are the boundaries of this campaign and is it not the responsibility of the LUSD Board to be protecting and serving all the students of our community? This breach of confidence from the Alvord, Buffalo, Hanson team in how our public schools should be operating reassures me that my vote will be for the incumbents, Dennis Darling and Tom Powers.
The tipping point for me in writing this letter to the editor is from the statements made at the Sept. 6 LUSD Board meeting when Alvord, Buffalo and Hanson stated that they knew nothing about the facilities master plan priority list that was created by the school district once the Measure T Bond was approved on the November 2014 ballot by voters.
Since that meeting, I have visited the LUSD Web site and found information provided regarding the bond, along with minutes from each Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee, or CBOC, meeting.
During this research, I have found that two of the three candidates are on that committee. Not only are Dan Buffalo and Jen Hanson both members of the CBOC, Dan was voted in as the clerk and Jen as the secretary at the very first meeting held on May 18, 2015.
According to the CBOC meeting minutes from Oct. 15, 2015, former LUSD Superintendent “Erin Smith-Hagberg reported that the Facilities Master Plan would be presented to the community on October 29th at 6:00 pm in the District Office. The CBO Committee is invited to attend this meeting.” As further evidence, it was again mentioned during the next meeting of the CBOC held on Jan. 21, 2016, which was led by Dan Buffalo, as the current president was not in attendance, that “Erin Smith-Hagberg reported that the Facilities Master Plan has been completed and is available for review on the website,” as was printed in the meeting minutes.
For the campaign of Alvord, Buffalo and Hanson to be standing on the platform of mismanagement of bond funds and that a “new set of eyes” is needed for the bond oversight, I find it extremely interesting that “a draft of the CBOC Annual Report was developed and submitted for review by Dan Buffalo” as was directly reported in the meeting minutes from January 5, 2017. Furthermore, during the approval of expenses at this same meeting it was written that, “The committee would also like to note that all expenditure reports are clear, concise, and accomplish an outstanding job in informing the committee on current, past and future bond expenditures.”
Finally, during the CBOC meeting held on Jan. 23, 2018, it was reported in the meeting minutes that “CBOC board member Dan Buffalo developed a draft of the Annual Report for the Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee. Committee members reviewed the draft and had no suggestions for change. Board members commended Mr. Buffalo on a job well done.”
How could both candidate Dan Buffalo and candidate Jen Hanson state, in a public meeting, that they knew nothing about the facts that were being presented from the project list that was part of the facilities master plan during the LUSD Board meeting held on Sept. 6? Especially given that both of them have been members of the CBOC since its inception and are still active members of the committee. If I had not taken the time to research information on the bond, I would have believed that what they were saying was true, as there was a lot of emotion being used to create a feeling of mistrust of our current LUSD Board members. I now know that emotions and politically charged jargon are being used to persuade our community to NOT look at the facts, but rather to make decisions driven by emotions.
I encourage each of you to do some research, ask questions, and be leary of overarching statements that seem to be riddled in emotion. Our current school district is consistently being transparent, has answered all of my current questions when I have reached out, and has a clear mission on meeting the needs of all of our students in our community.
The positive changes that I have noticed in this school district over the past year and a half can be directly attributed to the hard work of our current board members and superintendent. In order to continue seeing these positive changes grow and develop, it is imperative that both Dennis Darling and Tom Powers be re-elected to the LUSD Governing Board.
Kathy Gonzales lives in Lakeport, Calif.
I have had my own children graduate from Clear Lake High School and currently have grandchildren attending both Lakeport Elementary School and Terrace Middle School. I chose to attend the last LUSD Board meeting to hear both sides of the pool issue and to get a better sense of how our schools are currently operating. My family and I have always felt that our schools are strong and have provided support to our children.
I was glad that I attended the last LUSD Board meeting as it provided me with information on where I could start doing my own research, as both sides seem to be saying something different around similar topics. After my initial research, I feel even stronger that our current LUSD Board, the school administration and staff have the best interest of all of our students. It is unfortunate that the candidates that are running against our current board members are not being upfront on the real issues, but choose to lead with emotion and partial facts.
It seems like there are three main platforms that Carly Alvord, Dan Buffalo and Jennifer Hanson are running off of: 1. School safety; 2. Teacher retention; and 3. Mismanagement of bond funds, primarily for pool construction. I might be overgeneralizing these, but from my social interactions, I have narrowed it down to these three.
Over the past month, my friends and family have experienced excessive pressure from the Alvord, Buffalo, Hanson team; pushing to place campaign signs in their yards, being shown pictures of classroom destruction from last year at public meet and greet events, and sharing their views stating that our schools need to make sure that the special education children are not placed in the same classroom with the general education students as it may cause undue disruptions. All of which is strengthening the support for our current LUSD Board members in my opinion.
Where are the boundaries of this campaign and is it not the responsibility of the LUSD Board to be protecting and serving all the students of our community? This breach of confidence from the Alvord, Buffalo, Hanson team in how our public schools should be operating reassures me that my vote will be for the incumbents, Dennis Darling and Tom Powers.
The tipping point for me in writing this letter to the editor is from the statements made at the Sept. 6 LUSD Board meeting when Alvord, Buffalo and Hanson stated that they knew nothing about the facilities master plan priority list that was created by the school district once the Measure T Bond was approved on the November 2014 ballot by voters.
Since that meeting, I have visited the LUSD Web site and found information provided regarding the bond, along with minutes from each Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee, or CBOC, meeting.
During this research, I have found that two of the three candidates are on that committee. Not only are Dan Buffalo and Jen Hanson both members of the CBOC, Dan was voted in as the clerk and Jen as the secretary at the very first meeting held on May 18, 2015.
According to the CBOC meeting minutes from Oct. 15, 2015, former LUSD Superintendent “Erin Smith-Hagberg reported that the Facilities Master Plan would be presented to the community on October 29th at 6:00 pm in the District Office. The CBO Committee is invited to attend this meeting.” As further evidence, it was again mentioned during the next meeting of the CBOC held on Jan. 21, 2016, which was led by Dan Buffalo, as the current president was not in attendance, that “Erin Smith-Hagberg reported that the Facilities Master Plan has been completed and is available for review on the website,” as was printed in the meeting minutes.
For the campaign of Alvord, Buffalo and Hanson to be standing on the platform of mismanagement of bond funds and that a “new set of eyes” is needed for the bond oversight, I find it extremely interesting that “a draft of the CBOC Annual Report was developed and submitted for review by Dan Buffalo” as was directly reported in the meeting minutes from January 5, 2017. Furthermore, during the approval of expenses at this same meeting it was written that, “The committee would also like to note that all expenditure reports are clear, concise, and accomplish an outstanding job in informing the committee on current, past and future bond expenditures.”
Finally, during the CBOC meeting held on Jan. 23, 2018, it was reported in the meeting minutes that “CBOC board member Dan Buffalo developed a draft of the Annual Report for the Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee. Committee members reviewed the draft and had no suggestions for change. Board members commended Mr. Buffalo on a job well done.”
How could both candidate Dan Buffalo and candidate Jen Hanson state, in a public meeting, that they knew nothing about the facts that were being presented from the project list that was part of the facilities master plan during the LUSD Board meeting held on Sept. 6? Especially given that both of them have been members of the CBOC since its inception and are still active members of the committee. If I had not taken the time to research information on the bond, I would have believed that what they were saying was true, as there was a lot of emotion being used to create a feeling of mistrust of our current LUSD Board members. I now know that emotions and politically charged jargon are being used to persuade our community to NOT look at the facts, but rather to make decisions driven by emotions.
I encourage each of you to do some research, ask questions, and be leary of overarching statements that seem to be riddled in emotion. Our current school district is consistently being transparent, has answered all of my current questions when I have reached out, and has a clear mission on meeting the needs of all of our students in our community.
The positive changes that I have noticed in this school district over the past year and a half can be directly attributed to the hard work of our current board members and superintendent. In order to continue seeing these positive changes grow and develop, it is imperative that both Dennis Darling and Tom Powers be re-elected to the LUSD Governing Board.
Kathy Gonzales lives in Lakeport, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: Kathy Gonzales
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) declared, “America is tearing itself apart.”, as he voted to send Judge Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination to the Senate floor.
He attached a caveat that there be an FBI investigation, not to exceed one week, into the Ford and Ramirez allegations of sexual assault.
The 21 U.S senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate and the House of Representatives as a whole, divided along party lines, are, sometimes viciously attacking each other.
They are joined by a small population of passionate people on both the right and the left. Those people create demonstrations often without logic or facts. These are the people who are “tearing themselves apart.” It is not America tearing itself apart.
In a graduate school seminar heated debate on why more people were not politically active, I paraphrased a political science professor from undergraduate school who opined, “Fortunately, there are only a few passionate minorities on both the left and the right with a great mass in the center. Otherwise, we would have a revolution every four years.”
Here in our county, which is probably not dissimilar to the rest of the country, most people have opinions on various issues, some with strong opinions. Yet we socialize together, do business together, attend events together and even go to church together without “tearing each other apart.”
For those who believe I am being naïve, American political history since the end of World War II proves that the “crises” of today will pass, to be followed by yet other “crises.”
Peter MacRae holds a master’s degree in international relations and international conflict resolution. He is the author of four books: “A Measured Response: The United Global Security Partnership,” “The Poppies of Mohammed,” “Do the Muslims Have An Argument?” and “A Capital Crime.” He is currently working on a sequel to “The Poppies of Mohammed,” the title of which is “ISIS and the Lone Wolf.” He lives in Lakeport, Calif.
He attached a caveat that there be an FBI investigation, not to exceed one week, into the Ford and Ramirez allegations of sexual assault.
The 21 U.S senators on the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate and the House of Representatives as a whole, divided along party lines, are, sometimes viciously attacking each other.
They are joined by a small population of passionate people on both the right and the left. Those people create demonstrations often without logic or facts. These are the people who are “tearing themselves apart.” It is not America tearing itself apart.
In a graduate school seminar heated debate on why more people were not politically active, I paraphrased a political science professor from undergraduate school who opined, “Fortunately, there are only a few passionate minorities on both the left and the right with a great mass in the center. Otherwise, we would have a revolution every four years.”
Here in our county, which is probably not dissimilar to the rest of the country, most people have opinions on various issues, some with strong opinions. Yet we socialize together, do business together, attend events together and even go to church together without “tearing each other apart.”
For those who believe I am being naïve, American political history since the end of World War II proves that the “crises” of today will pass, to be followed by yet other “crises.”
Peter MacRae holds a master’s degree in international relations and international conflict resolution. He is the author of four books: “A Measured Response: The United Global Security Partnership,” “The Poppies of Mohammed,” “Do the Muslims Have An Argument?” and “A Capital Crime.” He is currently working on a sequel to “The Poppies of Mohammed,” the title of which is “ISIS and the Lone Wolf.” He lives in Lakeport, Calif.
- Details
- Written by: Peter G. R. MacRae, M.A.