How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

Space News: One large Milky Way galaxy or many galaxies? 100 years ago, a young Edwin Hubble settled astronomy’s ‘Great Debate’

 

The Andromeda galaxy helped Edwin Hubble settle a great debate in astronomy. Stocktrek Images via Getty Images

A hundred years ago, astronomer Edwin Hubble dramatically expanded the size of the known universe. At a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in January 1925, a paper read by one of his colleagues on his behalf reported that the Andromeda nebula, also called M31, was nearly a million light years away – too remote to be a part of the Milky Way.

Hubble’s work opened the door to the study of the universe beyond our galaxy. In the century since Hubble’s pioneering work, astronomers like me have learned that the universe is vast and contains trillions of galaxies.

Nature of the nebulae

In 1610, astronomer Galileo Galilei used the newly invented telescope to show that the Milky Way was composed of a huge number of faint stars. For the next 300 years, astronomers assumed that the Milky Way was the entire universe.

As astronomers scanned the night sky with larger telescopes, they were intrigued by fuzzy patches of light called nebulae. Toward the end of the 18th century, astronomer William Herschel used star counts to map out the Milky Way. He cataloged a thousand new nebulae and clusters of stars. He believed that the nebulae were objects within the Milky Way.

Charles Messier also produced a catalog of over 100 prominent nebulae in 1781. Messier was interested in comets, so his list was a set of fuzzy objects that might be mistaken for comets. He intended for comet hunters to avoid them since they did not move across the sky.

As more data piled up, 19th century astronomers started to see that the nebulae were a mixed bag. Some were gaseous, star-forming regions, such as the Orion nebula, or M42 – the 42nd object in Messier’s catalog – while others were star clusters such as the Pleiades, or M45.

A third category – nebulae with spiral structure – particularly intrigued astronomers. The Andromeda nebula, M31, was a prominent example. It’s visible to the naked eye from a dark site.

The Andromeda galaxy, then known as the Andromeda nebula, is a bright spot in the sky that intrigued early astronomers.

Astronomers as far back as the mid-18th century had speculated that some nebulae might be remote systems of stars or “island universes,” but there was no data to support this hypothesis. Island universes referred to the idea that there could be enormous stellar systems outside the Milky Way – but astronomers now just call these systems galaxies.

In 1920, astronomers Harlow Shapley and Heber Curtis held a Great Debate. Shapley argued that the spiral nebulae were small and in the Milky Way, while Curtis took a more radical position that they were independent galaxies, extremely large and distant.

At the time, the debate was inconclusive. Astronomers now know that galaxies are isolated systems of stars, much smaller than the space between them.

Hubble makes his mark

Edwin Hubble was young and ambitious. At the of age 30, he arrived at Mount Wilson Observatory in Southern California just in time to use the new Hooker 100-inch telescope, at the time the largest in the world.

A black and white photo of a man looking through the lens of a large telescope.
Edwin Hubble uses the telescope at the Mount Wilson Observatory. Hulton Archives via Getty Images

He began taking photographic plates of the spiral nebulae. These glass plates recorded images of the night sky using a light-sensitive emulsion covering their surface. The telescope’s size let it make images of very faint objects, and its high-quality mirror allowed it to distinguish individual stars in some of the nebulae.

Estimating distances in astronomy is challenging. Think of how hard it is to estimate the distance of someone pointing a flashlight at you on a dark night. Galaxies come in a very wide range of sizes and masses. Measuring a galaxy’s brightness or apparent size is not a good guide to its distance.

Hubble leveraged a discovery made by Henrietta Swan Leavitt 10 years earlier. She worked at the Harvard College Observatory as a “human computer,” laboriously measuring the positions and brightness of thousands of stars on photographic plates.

She was particularly interested in Cepheid variables, which are stars whose brightness pulses regularly, so they get brighter and dimmer with a particular period. She found a relationship between their variation period, or pulse, and their intrinsic brightness or luminosity.

Once you measure a Cepheid’s period, you can calculate its distance from how bright it appears using the inverse square law. The more distant the star is, the fainter it appears.

Hubble worked hard, taking images of spiral nebulae every clear night and looking for the telltale variations of Cepheid variables. By the end of 1924, he had found 12 Cepheids in M31. He calculated M31’s distance as a prodigious 900,000 light years away, though he underestimated its true distance – about 2.5 million light years – by not realizing there were two different types of Cepheid variables.

His measurements marked the end of the Great Debate about the Milky Way’s size and the nature of the nebulae. Hubble wrote about his discovery to Harlow Shapley, who had argued that the Milky Way encompassed the entire universe.

“Here is the letter that destroyed my universe,” Shapley remarked.

Always eager for publicity, Hubble leaked his discovery to The New York Times five weeks before a colleague presented his paper at the astronomers’ annual meeting in Washington, D.C.

An expanding universe of galaxies

But Hubble wasn’t done. His second major discovery also transformed astronomers’ understanding of the universe. As he dispersed the light from dozens of galaxies into a spectrum, which recorded the amount of light at each wavelength, he noticed that the light was always shifted to longer or redder wavelengths.

Light from the galaxy passes through a prism or reflects off a diffraction grating in a telescope, which captures the intensity of light from blue to red.

Astronomers call a shift to longer wavelengths a redshift.

It seemed that these redshifted galaxies were all moving away from the Milky Way.

Hubble’s results suggested the farther away a galaxy was, the faster it was moving away from Earth. Hubble got the lion’s share of the credit for this discovery, but Lowell Observatory astronomer Vesto Slipher, who noticed the same phenomenon but didn’t publish his data, also anticipated that result.

Hubble referred to galaxies having recession velocities, or speeds of moving away from the Earth, but he never figured out that they were moving away from Earth because the universe is getting bigger.

Belgian cosmologist and Catholic priest Georges Lemaitre made that connection by realizing that the theory of general relativity described an expanding universe. He recognized that space expanding in between the galaxies could cause the redshifts, making it seem like they were moving farther away from each other and from Earth.

Lemaitre was the first to argue that the expansion must have begun during the big bang.

The Hubble telescope, which looks like a metal cylinder, floating in space.
Edwin Hubble is the namesake for NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, which has spent decades observing faraway galaxies. NASA via AP

NASA named its flagship space observatory after Hubble, and it has been used to study galaxies for 35 years. Astronomers routinely observe galaxies that are thousands of times fainter and more distant than galaxies observed in the 1920s. The James Webb Space Telescope has pushed the envelope even farther.

The current record holder is a galaxy a staggering 34 billion light years away, seen just 200 million years after the big bang, when the universe was 20 times smaller than it is now. Edwin Hubble would be amazed to see such progress.The Conversation

Chris Impey, University Distinguished Professor of Astronomy, University of Arizona

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Lakeport City Council considers new ordinance to curb loitering at public restrooms

LAKEPORT, Calif. — The Lakeport City Council considered a new ordinance to restrict “loitering” in and about public restrooms, as proposed by the police department at Tuesday’s council meeting.

A public hearing with second-reading is scheduled for February 4.

The proposed rule would prohibit individuals from loitering within 15 feet of public restrooms and intentionally blocking the entrances and exits. Offenders asked to leave for loitering would be barred from returning for 72 hours, according to the staff report.

“Within the past 18 months, the city of Lakeport has experienced an increase in subjects loitering, lingering and being idle at or close to the public restrooms,” Lakeport Police Sgt. Ryan Cooley said during his presentation at the council meeting.

The staff report on the matter was submitted by Police Chief Dale Stoebe, who joined the meeting on Zoom because he was out for training.

Some of the undesired behaviors described in Cooley’s presentation included “sitting or lying on the floors inside the public restroom,” “being idle” near and within the public restroom, and “blocking entrances and exits.”

He also mentioned that aggressive behaviors occurred at times for which “the police department has been summoned.”

For the police department, Cooley said the new ordinance provides a new tool of enforcement that is not yet supported by current local and state laws.

Current local code does not have “an enforcement section to regulate the described conduct,” while related state laws are only “enforceable when a sexual gratification component can be established,” Cooley noted.

“This ordinance will allow sworn police officers to return public restroom space to its intended use and by the community,” Cooley said.

After public comment and council discussion, the council unanimously agreed to move forward with the proposed ordinance to the next step.

The public hearing and second reading, which may include a possible vote by the council on adoption, will be held on Tuesday, Feb. 4, said Deputy City Clerk Hilary Britton.

Discussion on the ordinance’s purpose and public notice

After Cooley’s report, Councilmember Brandon Disney immediately raised the question of whether the city was going to put additional signage about loitering at the public restrooms to “make it known” to people.

“I don’t think that was a consideration at this time,” said City Manager Kevin Ingram. “If it continues to be a problem even with the enforcement of this then that may be something that can be considered.”

During public comment, Fourth Street resident Danny Wind voiced discontent with the proposed ordinance.

“If you want to arrest our neighbors experiencing homelessness, the courts will support you,” said Wind. “I’m not surprised to see this kind of legislation come forth as many other jurisdictions have followed suit.”

“I don’t think this is an ordinance targeted at necessarily people who are homeless or houseless,” said Todd Freitas, president of the Lakeport Police Officers’ Association, speaking as a member of the public.

“Essentially it's a warning. It's a toolbox for us as a police officer to say, hey, look, you're clearly loitering. In the discretion of me as a police officer, you basically are an adult timeout. You lost your privileges to the park for the next 72 hours,” said Freitas, who thought the ordinance is a “very fair and balanced approach.”

Freitas also responded to Disney’s concern regarding signage and public notice.

“There are the signs of ‘no fishing’ at all of our boat ramps. And when I'm working patrol, I usually talk to about 13 people a day about that,” Freitas said. “So the signs don't always address things, unfortunately.”

Freitas added that public meetings and the police’ “educational approach” would be the ways to “make it available to people.”

Discussion on gender-related language and unisex public restrooms

In their comments, Wind also asked the council to amend the language related to gender under the section that regulates the use of public restrooms, which was not on the agenda for this meeting.

The section currently reads, “Male persons shall not resort to any restroom or washroom facilities set apart for women, and female persons shall not resort to restrooms and washroom facilities set apart for men.”

“In the state of California, it is possible to receive an X indicator under sex on state IDs,” said Wind of the non-binary gender options with which people can legally identify.

Wind requested the council remove the language specifying male and female persons and reduce it to “no person shall use such facilities for purposes other than those intended.”

Mayor Kim Costa responded that it would be a significant change and would require public input and more time to “suss out.”

“So as of today, I am not open to just unilaterally lining that out and adding the new language,” Costa said.

“I think we can bring this back at a future date, after doing more research, looking at the legality of it,” Disney added. “But that's just not at the public notice for this meeting, nor is it written in front of us tonight.”

Councilmember Kenny Parlet asked about “unisex” public restrooms in the city.

“The new restrooms we installed at the park at First, Third and Fifth streets that have a facility on each side have no gender designation on them,” Public Works Director Ron Ladd responded.

“So that would never have been a problem there and doesn't need to be changed,” Parlet said. “Because anyone who needs to use it for the purposes intended, could go in there without a problem, and it's only a short walk.”

Email staff reporter Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

New bill aims to protect victims of domestic violence and sexual offenses

A new bill aims to protect victims of domestic violence when their convicted assailants are released from incarceration.

AB 285 was introduced by Assemblymember James C. Ramos (D-San Bernardino) and co-sponsored by the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office and the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office.

“I introduced AB 285 to ensure victims of domestic violence and sexual offenses are protected from being re-victimized,” said Ramos. “By issuing a criminal protective order, we ensure that upon an offender’s release, they cannot gain contact with those whom they victimized. This is especially important when it comes to Missing and Murdered Indigenous Persons as many of those cases stem from domestic violence. We want to ensure that all victims are able to feel protected even when the individuals who harmed them are released from prison. Victims should not have to live again in fear.”

AB 285 would require that if a defendant is convicted of domestic violence or a sex offense, they be served with a temporary criminal protective order that would last no more than 180 days upon their release from prison.

Under current law, these orders against defendants may expire before their release, and this bill aims to remedy that, especially for the most violent offenders.

“The Riverside County District Attorney’s Office is proud to sponsor and support AB 285. Currently, when domestic violence abusers are convicted, they are issued restraining orders that prohibit contact with their victims. However, these restraining orders sometimes expire before the abuser is released from prison, leaving the victim at risk,” said District Attorney Mike Hestrin. “AB 285 aims to close this gap by requiring a six-month temporary restraining order to be in effect prior to the abuser’s release, giving the victim adequate time to seek a permanent restraining order for their protection. We commend Assemblymember Ramos for introducing this vital legislation to safeguard some of our most vulnerable victims.”

“When survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault seek justice, the healing process doesn’t end when an offender is convicted and sentenced. Survivors often live in fear of facing an eventual prison release date and potential contact with the offender,” said San Bernardino County District Attorney Jason Anderson. “For this reason, I am thankful to Assemblymember James Ramos for introducing AB 285, which will allow for additional temporary criminal protective orders safeguarding victims of crime upon release of the convicted offender. San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office supports this legislation that adds additional protections against the harm and re-victimization of domestic violence and sexual assault survivors.”

The bill is currently pending referral to a policy committee.

$7.4 billion settlement reached with Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family for fueling the opioid crisis

California Attorney General Rob Bonta on Thursday announced that the bipartisan States Negotiating Committee and other parties have reached a $7.4 billion settlement in principle with members of the Sackler family and their former company Purdue Pharma L.P. for what Bonta’s office said was “their instrumental role in creating and exacerbating the opioid crisis.”

“Purdue, under the Sacklers’ leadership, invented, manufactured, and aggressively marketed opioid products for decades, fueling waves of addiction and overdose deaths across the country,” Bonta’s office said in the Thursday statement.

The settlement ends the Sacklers’ control of Purdue and ability to sell opioids in the United States, and will deliver funding directly to communities across the country over the next 15 years to support opioid addiction treatment, prevention, and recovery programs.

“The opioid epidemic has ravaged communities in California and across the country, forever changing society as we know it. My office has been committed to fighting this crisis, and today, we are holding accountable two of the worst perpetrators: Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family,” said Attorney General Bonta. “I want to thank my team at the California Department of Justice and my fellow attorneys general for making this historic settlement possible. Those who prioritize profits over people will continue to face serious consequences.”

If approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Thursday’s proposed settlement, which will be part of a comprehensive bankruptcy plan of reorganization, will deliver funds to the participating states, local governments, affected individuals, and other parties.

A significant amount of the settlement funds will be distributed in the first three years, with the Sacklers paying $1.5 billion and Purdue paying nearly $900 million soon after a bankruptcy plan is confirmed, followed by $500 million after one year, an additional $500 million after two years, and $400 million after three years.

California is expected to receive hundreds of millions of dollars for opioid abatement.

The settlement also reflects the end of the Sacklers’ control of Purdue and bars them from selling opioids in the United States. A board of trustees selected by participating states in consultation with the other creditors will determine the future of the company. Purdue will continue to be overseen by a monitor and will be prevented from lobbying or marketing opioids under the settlement.

If approved, the proposed bankruptcy plan and related settlement will make public more than 30 million documents related to Purdue and the Sacklers’ opioid business.

The document repository will now also contain documents relating to compliance with the 2007 State Attorneys General Consent Judgments with Purdue, and after six years will make public certain documents that were subject to attorney-client and work-product protection.

In 2021, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York approved a bankruptcy plan covering Purdue and the Sackler family that would have required the Sacklers to pay billions of dollars in exchange for non-consensual releases from liability.

In June 2024, the United States Supreme Court invalidated the previous bankruptcy plan, holding that the Bankruptcy Code did not authorize such nonconsensual shields from liability. The current settlement in principle is built on consensual releases in exchange for the payments the Sacklers will be making.

Members of the Sackler family included in the settlement in principle include the eight heirs of Purdue founders Raymond and Mortimer Sackler who served on the Board of Purdue: Richard, Kathe, Mortimer Jr., Ilene, David, and Theresa Sackler; and the estates of Jonathan and Beverly Sackler. In addition, their associated trusts, advisers and most of their children and heirs are also included.

Joining Attorney General Bonta in securing the settlement in principle are the members of the States Negotiating Committee: the attorneys general of New York, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia.

FDA bans Red 3 dye from food and drugs – a scientist explains the artificial color’s health risks and long history

 

Look out for Red 3, FD&C Red No. 3, erythrosine or E127 in the ingredients list of your favorite processed foods. Anhelina Chumak/iStock via Getty Images Plus

Red 3 – also called FD&C Red No. 3, erythrosine or E127 – has been widely used in food, cosmetics and pharmaceuticals since its FDA approval in 1969. You’ve likely encountered Red 3 before. It’s a common additive to many candies, beverages, baked goods, cereals, maraschino cherries and gelatin desserts, as well as certain medications, syrups and cosmetics.

However, mounting scientific evidence suggests that consuming Red 3 poses significant health risks. These risks prompted California to ban its use in food in 2023 and the Food and Drug Administration to ban its use in both food and pharmaceuticals nationwide on Jan. 15, 2025.

As a researcher studying inflammation and cancer, I investigate how synthetic food dyes affect human health. Stricter regulations reflect growing concerns over the negative physiological effects of Red 3 and other synthetic dyes on your body, including causing cancer.

Health risks of Red 3

Over the past 35 years, an increasing amount of scientific evidence has identified the negative health effects of Red 3. While researchers haven’t yet established a direct link between Red 3 and cancer in people, substantial evidence from animal studies points to its carcinogenic potential.

First, Red 3 disrupts thyroid hormone regulation through several mechanisms. It inhibits the thyroid gland’s ability to absorb iodine, a key component for synthesizing thyroid hormones, and blocks an enzyme essential for converting one thyroid hormone to another, contributing to thyroid dysfunction. Along with other impairments in thyroid hormone function, Red 3 increases the risk of thyroid-related disorders.

Second, Red 3 may promote thyroid tumor formation. Several studies exposing rats and pigs to Red 3 observed enlarged tumorous thyroid glands and abnormalities in hormone regulation.

Third, Red 3 can have toxic effects on the brain in multiple ways. Rat studies have found that this synthetic dye increases oxidative stress, which damages tissues, and reduces the antioxidants that control oxidative stress, impairing communication between neurons. Studies in rodents also found that Red 3 triggers neuroinflammation that leads to neuronal damage and dysfunction. Additionally, Red 3 may interact with the amyloid-beta peptides linked to neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer’s disease and worsen those conditions.

Regulatory momentum

Red 3 first faced scrutiny in the 1980s when several animal studies linked it to thyroid tumors in male rats. This led to its 1990 ban in cosmetics in the U.S., although its use in food persisted under industry pressure. While the European Union restricted the use of Red 3 to only certain types of processed cherries in 1994, the U.S. has lagged behind.

California’s 2023 ban of Red 3 in foods, effective in 2027, reignited debate on Red 3 and its link to cancer and spurred 24 organizations to advocate for federal action.

Several countries have banned the use of Red 3 in food. Until January 2025, the U.S. had only banned it in cosmetics and topical drugs.

This debate culminated in the FDA’s nationwide ban in January 2025. While the FDA cites no direct evidence of Red 3’s carcinogenic effect in people, it acknowledges that animal studies provide sufficient basis for regulatory action. The FDA’s decision aligns with the 1958 Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, mandating a ban on additives shown to cause cancer in humans or animals.

Notably, it took over 35 years from the initial findings of thyroid cancer in rodents to the eventual ban in 2025.

A path forward

The progression from Red 3’s approval to its prohibition highlights the conflict between industrial interests and public health. Continued vigilance over Red 3 could help the nation prioritize consumer safety.

Under the FDA’s mandate, manufacturers must reformulate food products and ingested drugs to leave out Red 3 by January 2027 and January 2028, respectively. While some countries still permit use of Red 3, U.S. imports must meet domestic safety standards. Harmonizing global standards on regulating and evaluating synthetic dyes is essential to protect consumer health.

Close-up of colorful cereal loops
Stronger, more standardized regulation of synthetic food dyes would help protect consumer health. choness/iStock via Getty Images

Several companies selling ultra-processed foods have begun the shift away from synthetic dyes. In 2016, Mars announced plans to remove all artificial colors from its human food products over a five-year period. In 2024, General Mills announced that it would eliminate artificial colors and flavors from its products.

Consumers can protect themselves from Red 3 exposure by reading ingredient labels for “FD&C Red No. 3” or “E127” and choosing products that use natural dyes. Preparing homemade foods with natural color alternatives like beet juice or turmeric is another option. Supporting dye-free brands and staying informed about regulatory changes can further reduce your exposure while promoting safer food practices.

Ongoing research and policy reforms focused on public safety could help ensure that food additives like Red 3 no longer put consumer health at risk.The Conversation

Lorne J. Hofseth, Professor and Associate Dean for Research, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Kelseyville’s name change may come back to the Board of Supervisors

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — In December, the Board of Supervisors submitted a recommendation to the United States Board of Geographical Names to support renaming Kelseyville to Konocti following a board vote. Now, with newly sworn-in supervisors, the board faces calls to revisit the contentious decision.

Last Tuesday, former Supervisor Rob Brown urged the Board of Supervisors to revisit the matter during public comment at the boarding meeting.

Brown, who served five terms as District 5 supervisor until 2021, argued that the new supervisors, Helen Owen and Brad Rasmussen, should have the opportunity to “weigh in.”

“I think it’s important that the current board, including the two new board members, be involved in this discussion,” Brown said.

Brown also criticized the timing of the board’s December decision, which included votes made by two outgoing supervisors who were to leave office in January, and questioned the legitimacy of outgoing District 4 Supervisor Michael Green’s involvement in “an issue this magnitude.”

“They are not going to be here to deal with the ramifications and the fallout of this decision, regardless of how it comes down,” Brown continued.

“In fact, one of the board members was not even a legitimately elected board member, nor did he care enough to even run for office as a county supervisor,” said Brown, referring to Green, who was not elected but who Gov. Gavin Newsom appointed in 2022. He did not run for office in 2024.

“So I respectfully ask that it be placed on the earliest available agenda for reconsideration,” Brown added.

In addition to making public comment, Brown also contacted Supervisor Eddie Crandell, who serves as the board chair for 2025, prior to and right after the meeting regarding the matter. Last Wednesday, Crandell responded.

“Thank you again for touching base with me before the meeting. I will definitely reach out to you with the date and time this will be agendized,” Crandell said in the email to Brown, suggesting a positive response to Brown’s request.

As of Wednesday, Supervisor Crandell has not replied to Lake County News’ inquiries regarding if the board will bring back the matter and on what grounds it can be done so as the recommendation for the name change has been submitted.

For Brown, the December vote by the former board was not supposed to take place in the first place as two supervisors were stepping down.

“They should have held it off anyway,” Brown told Lake County News in a phone call. “The new board is the one who has to deal with the fallout on any name changes or not name change — either way.”

Although Brown has not heard back from Supervisor Crandell on when it will be agendized, he believes it’s coming soon.

“I’m assuming it’s going to be the first Tuesday of February,” said Brown. “There’s no reason for it to drag on.”

The pathway to the board’s name change recommendation

In October 2023, “Citizens for Healing” proposed renaming Kelseyville, citing its association with Andrew Kelsey, who, with Charles Stone, brutalized, raped and murdered Pomo tribal members. Their actions led to their deaths in 1849, sparking retaliatory violence, including the 1850 Bloody Island massacre.

In February, the U.S. Board of Geographic Names, or the BGN, sought input from the Board of Supervisors on the matter.

The Board of Supervisors held a special meeting in July and placed the countywide advisory, non-binding Measure U on the ballot. It asked voters if the Board of Supervisors should recommend the name change of Kelseyville to Konocti, as Citizens for Healing proposed.

A majority of voters rejected the measure in November, with 70.58% voting “no” and 29.42% voting “yes.”

On Dec. 10, the Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 to recommend the name change to the BGN despite voter opposition.

Supervisor Eddie Crandell, and outgoing supervisor Moke Simon and Michael Green voted in favor of the option to recommend the name change.

Crandell cited unanimous support from the National Congress of American Indians, which consists of 574 federally-recognized tribes in the nation. Simon said he got what he wanted — to have people’s vote “on the record.” Green said the name is derogatory and offensive and has to “go bye-bye.”

Supervisor Jessica Pyska and Bruno Sabatier voted against it. Pyska, in whose district Kelseyville is located, suggested giving no formal recommendation while Sabatier supported a name change but opposed “Konocti.”

Three days later on Dec. 13, the Board of Supervisors sent the formal recommendation letter by email to both the federal and state agencies — the BGN’s Domestic Names Committee and California Advisory Committee on Geographic Names — at 6:51 a.m., according to Chief Deputy County Administrative Officer Matthew Rothstein.

Rothstein provided Lake County News with a copy of this letter, titled “RE: Response to Citizens for Healing’s Proposed Kelseyville-Konocti Name Change.”

The letter included the ballot results on Measure U, as requested by Supervisor Pyska before casting her vote, and explained the board’s reason for supporting the name change. The last two paragraphs read:

“In response to Advisory Measure U, Lake County residents demonstrated their Opposition to the proposed Name Change (70.58% Opposed, 29.42% In Favor), and members of our Board
have concern changing a longstanding and valued town name is a non-trivial matter. However, our collective awareness of the violent acts committed by Kelsey and Stone demands change.

“Therefore, it is our collective Recommendation your Committee Approve the proposed Name Change.”

Later on the morning of Dec. 13, Executive Secretary Shellie Zahniser of the BGN’s Domestic Names Committee acknowledged the receipt of the email, Rothstein reported.

“But the County has not been provided any further updates on the timeline for either the State or Federal Naming Authorities’ decision-making,” Rothstein said in an email to Lake County News dated Jan 6.

For Brown, the fact that the BGN hasn’t acted on it leaves room for the Board of Supervisors to bring it back.

“So yeah, they can bring it back,” said Brown. “They have the obligation to bring it back.”

Email staff reporter Lingzi Chen at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..
  • 312
  • 313
  • 314
  • 315
  • 316
  • 317
  • 318
  • 319
  • 320
  • 321

Community

  • Sheriff’s Activities League and Clearlake Bassmasters offer youth fishing clinic

  • City Nature Challenge takes place April 24 to 27

Public Safety

  • Lakeport Police logs: Wednesday, Feb. 11

  • Lakeport Police logs: Tuesday, Feb. 10

Education

  • Ramos measure requiring school officer training in use of anti-opioid drug moves forward

  • Lake County Chapter of CWA announces annual scholarships 

Health

  • California ranks 24th in America’s Health Rankings Annual Report from United Health Foundation

  • Healthy blood donors especially vital during active flu season

Business

  • Employment law summit takes place March 9

  • Two Lake County Mediacom employees earn company’s top service awards

Obituaries

  • Terry Knight

  • Ellen Thomas

Opinion & Letters

  • Who should pay for AI’s power? Not California ratepayers

  • Crandell: Supporting nephew for reelection in supervisorial race

Veterans

  • State honors fallen chief warrant officer killed in conflict in Iran

  • CalVet and CSU Long Beach team up to improve data collection related to veteran suicides

Recreation

  • April Audubon program will show how volunteers can help monitor local osprey nests

  • First guided nature walk of spring at Anderson Marsh State Historic Park April 11

  • Second Saturday guided nature walks continue at Anderson Marsh State Historic Park

  • Wet weather trail closure in effect on Upper Lake Ranger District

Religion

  • Kelseyville Presbyterian Church plans Easter service

  • Easter ‘Sonrise’ Service returns to Xabatin Community Park

Arts & Life

  • ‘CIA’ delves into the shadowy world of an espionage thriller

  • ‘War Machine’ shifts the battlefield into uncharted territory

Government & Politics

  • Lake County Democratic Central Committee endorses Falkenberg

  • Crandell launches reelection campaign plans March 15 event

Legals

  • April 23 hearing on Lake Coco Farms Major Use Permit

  • NOTICE OF 30-DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD & NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page