How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page
Lake County News,California
  • Home
    • Registration Form
  • News
    • Education
    • Veterans
    • Community
      • Obituaries
      • Letters
      • Commentary
    • Police Logs
    • Business
    • Recreation
    • Health
    • Religion
    • Legals
    • Arts & Life
    • Regional
  • Calendar
  • Contact us
    • FAQs
    • Phones, E-Mail
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise Here
  • Login
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page

News

Clearlake City Council to discuss issues with Lake County Sanitation District

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 19 November 2025

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Clearlake City Council will hear a staff proposal to take back the city’s authority regarding governance of the Lake County Sanitation District. 

The council will meet at 6 p.m. Thursday, Nov. 20, in the council chambers at Clearlake City Hall, 14050 Olympic Drive.

The agenda can be found here.

The meeting will be broadcast live on the city's YouTube channel or the Lake County PEGTV YouTube Channel. 

Community members also can participate via Zoom. The pass code is 168709. One tap mobile is available at +16694449171,,82771053751#, or join by phone at 669-444-9171 or 646-931-3860.
 
The public will not be allowed to provide verbal comment during the meeting if attending via Zoom. The public can submit comments in writing for City Council consideration by commenting via the Q&A function in the Zoom platform or by sending comments to the Administrative Services Director/City Clerk at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. To give the City Council adequate time to review your comments, you must submit your written emailed comments prior to 4 p.m. on the day of the meeting.

One of the key agenda items on Thursday is the discussion and consideration of rescinding the city's delegation of authority to the Lake County Board of Supervisors to serve as the governing board of the Lake County Sanitation District.

The report to the council from City Manager Alan Flora and City Attorney Scott Drexel explains that the city started moving in this direction last year as the result of “significant and frequent concerns over the maintenance, operation and planning efforts of Lake County Special Districts management of the sanitation district, coupled with little cooperation in addressing long standing issues.”

In April of 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution 83-24 notifying the supervisors of the city's concerns and asking to meet to discuss it.

“In February of 2025 the Board of Supervisors finally discussed this request, but at the request of the County Administrative Office delayed any meeting until at least July 2025. Since that time numerous inquiries have been made to various County officials and no meeting has been scheduled to discuss,” the report said.

“The significance and frequency of maintenance, operation, and planning efforts have only grown since the City initially took action. At this time staff recommends rescinding the resolution 83-24, which will force the orderly transition of governance of the Lake County Sanitation District,” Flora and Drexel said in their report.

Under business, the council will hold an update and discussion on the city’s fire hydrant inspection, testing and maintenance ordinance.

The council also will discuss and consider awarding a $3,198,680.33 contract for the Burns Valley/Arrowhead/Olympic Drive Project to Lamon Construction, with authorization for the city manager to approve up to 10% for additional unforeseen contract amendments.

Also on Thursday, the council will hold a public hearing to consider a resolution authorizing the extension of temporary closures of certain roads to reduce illegal dumping and protect the environment, as well as the public health and welfare.

The council also will consider its 2026 meeting calendar, and host presentations for November’s adoptable dogs and a proclamation declaring November 2025 as Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month.

On the meeting’s consent agenda — items that are considered routine in nature and usually ad
opted on a single vote — are warrants; adoption of a resolution approving an amendment to the State CDBG Program Income Award, #21-CDBG-PI-00036-Senior Center Rehabilitation; the 2025 Mayor's Appointments List; a memo regarding holiday closures of the City Hall Administration Office; and adoption of Resolution No. 2025-43 approving a temporary street closure for the Winter Festival Celebration on Dec. 6.

The council also will hold a closed session for conference with legal counsel regarding the Koi Nation of Northern California v. City of Clearlake and for a performance evaluation of City Manager Alan Flora.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

Registrar’s office updates Prop 50 vote count; Lake County’s overall vote flips against measure

Details
Written by: Elizabeth Larson
Published: 19 November 2025

LAKE COUNTY, Calif. — The Lake County Registrar of Voters Office reported that it has made significant progress in counting thousands of more ballots as part of finalizing the county for the Nov. 4 Statewide Special Election to decide on the congressional redistricting measure, Proposition 50.

On Tuesday, the elections office issued its fourth report on the estimated number of unprocessed ballots still to count during the official canvass period, which ends early in December.

Since its report last week, the elections office has counted more than 5,500 additional ballots, some of which were ballots postmarked on or before Election Day that arrived up until Nov. 12.

As of Tuesday, the Registrar’s Office said it had 658 ballots still to count, including 12 vote-by-mail ballots, 386 provisional/conditional ballots, and 260 vote-by-mail ballots under further review.

The Registrar of Voters Office did not give an indication of how its vote count has changed, however, ballot counts are being reported by the California Secretary of State’s Office.

On Tuesday, the state said the Proposition 50 count showed 7,408,128 “yes” votes, or 64.4%, to 4,095,372 “no” votes, or 35.6%. While the number of ballots is up by several hundred thousand since last week, the percentages of yes and no votes remain the same.

Notably, Lake County’s Proposition 50 count has flipped from the yes votes leading to now the no votes edging out in front by 26 votes. On Tuesday, the no votes were up to 10,184, or 50.1%, with yes votes totaling 10,158, or 49.9%.

The registrar asked voters who received a “signature verification statement” or an “unsigned ballot envelope statement” to submit the completed statements to its office by 5 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 30.

Statements may be returned by fax, 707-263-2742; by email, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; and in person at the elections office, 325 N. Forbes St. in Lakeport.

The Registrar of Voters Office will be closed on Nov. 27 and 28 in observance of the Thanksgiving holiday. However, a drop box for after-hours and weekend use will be available at the elections office until 5 p.m. Nov. 30.

Replacement forms can be found on the Registrar of Voters’ current election webpage under “Voter Forms.”

For more information, call the Lake County Registrar of Voters Office at 707-263-2372 or toll-free at 888-235-6730, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. 

The county elections office plans to certify the final results on Dec. 2, two days ahead of the deadline that the state reported. 

The Secretary of State’s Office plans to certify the final results on Dec. 12.

Email Elizabeth Larson at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Follow her on Twitter, @ERLarson, and on Bluesky, @erlarson.bsky.social. Find Lake County News on the following platforms: Facebook, @LakeCoNews; X, @LakeCoNews; Threads, @lakeconews, and on Bluesky, @lakeconews.bsky.social. 

New California wolf pack confirmed

Details
Written by: LAKE COUNTY NEWS REPORTS
Published: 19 November 2025
OR-93, the Oregon wolf that traveled to California in 2020. Photo by Austin James Jr., Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — The California Department of Fish and Wildlife reported late Monday that a new wolf family was confirmed this fall. 

The Grizzly pack consists of two adults and a pup who have established territory in southern Plumas County.

The Grizzly pack’s confirmation means that California still has 10 existing packs, despite the demise of the Beyem Seyo pack in October from an agency kill action on members of that pack tied to conflicts with livestock.

“This year has brought both joyful and tragic news about wolves’ homecoming to California, but I’m elated there’s a new pack and more than 30 new pups roaming our state,” said Amaroq Weiss, senior wolf advocate with the Center for Biological Diversity. “Wolves are still in the early stages of recovery in California and these new arrivals keep their recovery on a positive trajectory.”

At least six of California’s wolf families had pups this year, with a total of 31 pups reportedly born.

The packs confirmed to have had pups this year include the Beyem Seyo pack (six pups), the Lassen pack (two pups), the Whaleback pack (10 pups), the Harvey pack (seven pups) and the Ice Cave pack (six pups).

Known wolf mortalities reported this quarter included the three adults and one pup from the Beyem Seyo pack killed by agency staff in October, two Beyem Seyo pups that likely died of natural causes, a yearling Beyem Seyo wolf found dead in August whose death is under investigation, and the breeding female of the Yowlumni pack, who was found dead in September and likely died from complications associated with mange.

Among several reports issued by the department in its Monday update was one detailing this year’s livestock-wolf predation investigations and conclusions from the beginning of January through Oct. 31. Just over half of livestock losses occurred in the Sierra Valley and were attributed to the Beyem Seyo pack.

“The Beyem Seyo pack’s loss was a tragedy because this family of endangered wolves could still be alive if ranchers had started proactively using conflict-deterrent measures three or four years ago,” said Weiss. “If we strive for success we’ll find it, but if we mistakenly think coexistence with wolves isn’t possible, then failure will find us. Though wolf recovery is still a new thing for people in California, I’m confident we can find pathways to success.”

The first wolf in nearly a century to make California part of his range was OR-7, a radio-collared wolf from Oregon that entered California in late 2011. 

OR-7 traveled across seven northeastern counties in California before returning to southwestern Oregon, where he found a mate and settled down, forming the Rogue pack.

Several of OR-7’s offspring have since come to California and established packs. Those include the original breeding male of the Lassen pack and the breeding female of the Yowlumni pack residing in Tulare County. 

The Shasta pack, California’s first confirmed wolf pack in nearly 100 years, was discovered in 2015 but disappeared a few months later.

The gray wolf (Canis lupus) is native to California but was driven to extinction in the state by the mid-1920s. 

After OR-7 left Oregon for California, the Center and allies successfully petitioned the state to fully protect wolves under California’s endangered species act. 

Wolves are also federally protected in California under the federal Endangered Species Act. It is illegal to intentionally kill any wolves in the state except in defense of human life.

 
 

Want to make America healthy again? Stop fueling climate change

Details
Written by: Jonathan Levy, Boston University; Howard Frumkin, University of Washington; Jonathan Patz, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Vijay Limaye, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Published: 19 November 2025

Extreme heat can threaten human health, but it’s only one way climate change puts lives at risk. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

If you’ve been following recent debates about health, you’ve been hearing a lot about vaccines, diet, measles, Medicaid cuts and health insurance costs – but much less about one of the greatest threats to global public health: climate change.

Anybody who’s fallen ill during a heat wave, struggled while breathing wildfire smoke or been injured cleaning up from a hurricane knows that climate change can threaten human health. Studies show that heat, air pollution, disease spread and food insecurity linked to climate change are worsening and costing millions of lives around the world each year.

The U.S. government formally recognized these risks in 2009 when it determined that climate change endangers public health and welfare.

However, the Trump administration is now moving to rescind that 2009 endangerment finding so it can reverse U.S. climate progress and help boost fossil fuel industries, including lifting limits on greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles and power plants. The administration’s arguments for doing so are not only factually wrong, they’re deeply dangerous to Americans’ health and safety.

Health risks and outcomes related to climate change.
Health risks and outcomes related to climate change. World Health Organization

As physicians, epidemiologists and environmental health scientists who study these effects, we’ve seen growing evidence of the connections between climate change and harm to people’s health. More importantly, we see ways humanity can improve health by tackling climate change.

Here’s a look at the risks and some of the steps individuals and governments can take to reduce them.

Extreme heat

Greenhouse gases from vehicles, power plants and other sources accumulate in the atmosphere, trapping heat and holding it close to Earth’s surface like a blanket. Too much of it causes global temperatures to rise, leaving more people exposed to dangerous heat more often.

Most people who get minor heat illnesses will recover, but more extreme exposure, especially without enough hydration and a way to cool off, can be fatal. People who work outside, are elderly or have underlying illnesses such as heart, lung or kidney diseases are often at the greatest risk.

Heat deaths have been rising globally, up 23% from the 1990s to the 2010s, when the average year saw more than half a million heat-related deaths. Even in the U.S., the Pacific Northwest heat dome in 2021 killed hundreds of people.

Climate scientists predict that with advancing climate change, many areas of the world, including U.S. cities such as Miami, Houston, Phoenix and Las Vegas, will confront many more days each year hot enough to threaten human survival.

Extreme weather

Warmer air holds more moisture, so climate change brings increasing rainfall and storm intensity, worsening flooding, as many U.S. communities have experienced in recent years. Warm ocean water also fuels more powerful hurricanes.

Increased flooding carries health risks, including drownings, electrocution and water contamination from human pathogens and toxic chemicals. People cleaning out flooded homes also face risks from mold exposure, injuries and mental distress.

A man carries boxes out of a house that flooded up to its second story.
Flooding from hurricanes and other extreme storms can put people at risk of injuries during the cleanup while also triggering dangerous mold growth on wet wallboard, carpets and fabric. This home flooded up to its second flood during Hurricane Irma in 2017. Sean Rayford/Getty Images

Climate change also worsens droughts, disrupting food supplies and causing respiratory illness from dust and dry conditions as well as wildfires. And rising temperatures and aridity dry out forest and grasslands, making them more vulnerable to catching fire, which creates other health risks.

Air pollution

Wildfires, along with other climate effects, are also worsening air quality around the country.

Wildfire smoke is a toxic soup of microscopic particles (known as fine particulate matter, or PM2.5) that can penetrate deep in the lungs and hazardous compounds such as lead, formaldehyde and dioxins generated when homes, cars and other materials burn at high temperatures. Smoke plumes can travel thousands of miles downwind and trigger heart attacks and elevate lung cancer risks, among other harms.

Meanwhile, warmer conditions favor the formation of ground-level ozone, a heart and lung irritant. Burning of fossil fuels also generates dangerous air pollutants that cause a host of health problems, including heart attacks, strokes, asthma flare-ups and lung cancer.

Infectious diseases

Because they are cold-blooded organisms, insects are directly influenced by temperature. So as temperatures have risen, mosquito biting rates have risen as well. Warming also shortens the development time of disease agents that mosquitoes transmit.

Mosquito-borne dengue fever has turned up in Florida, Texas, Hawaii, Arizona and California. New York state just saw its first locally acquired case of chikungunya virus, also transmitted by mosquitoes.

A world map shows where mosquitos are most likely to transmit the dengue virus
As global temperatures rise, regions are becoming more suitable for mosquitoes to transmit dengue virus. The map shows a suitability scale, with red areas already suitable for dengue transmissions and yellow areas becoming more suitable. Taishi Nakase, et al., 2022, CC BY

And it’s not just insect-borne infections. Warmer temperatures increase diarrhea and foodborne illness from Vibrio cholerae and other bacteria and heavy rainfall increases sewage-contaminated stormwater overflows into lakes and streams. At the other water extreme, drought in the desert Southwest increases the risk of coccidioidomycosis, a fungal infection known as valley fever.

Other impacts

Climate change can threaten health in numerous other ways. Longer pollen seasons can increase allergen exposures. Lower crop yields can reduce access to nutritious foods.

Mental health can also suffer, with anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress following disasters, and increased rates of violent crime and suicide tied to high-temperature days.

A older man holds a door for a woman at a cooling center.
New York and many other cities now open cooling centers during heat waves to help residents, particularly older adults who might not have air conditioning at home, stay safe during the hottest parts of the day. Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images

Young children, older adults, pregnant women and people with preexisting medical conditions are among the highest-risk groups. Often, lower-income people are also at greater risk because of higher rates of chronic disease, higher exposures to climate hazards and fewer resources for protection, medical care and recovery from disasters.

What can people and governments do?

As an individual, you can reduce your risk by following public health advice during heat waves, storms and wildfires; protecting yourself against tick and mosquito bites; and spending time in green space that improves your mental health.

You can also make healthy choices that reduce your carbon footprint, such as:

  • Walking, biking or using public transit instead of driving, since more physical activity reduces chronic disease risks.

  • Rebalancing your diet from meat-heavy to plant-forward, which can cut your risk of heart disease and lower greenhouse gas emissions from meat production.

  • Making your home more energy-efficient and opting for electric rather than gas- or oil-powered heating and cooking, which can reduce emissions while improving indoor air quality.

However, there are limits to what individuals can do alone.

Actions by governments and companies are also necessary to protect people from a warmer climate and stop the underlying causes of climate change.

Workplace safety can be addressed through rules to reduce heat exposure for people who work outdoors in industries such as agriculture and construction. Communities can open cooling centers during heat waves, provide early warning systems and design drinking water systems that can handle more intense rainfall and runoff, reducing contamination risks.

Governments can ensure that public transit is available and not overly expensive to reduce the number of vehicles on the road. They can promote clean energy rather than fossil fuels to cut emissions, which can also save money since the cost of solar energy has dropped spectacularly. In fact, both solar and wind energy are less expensive than fossil fuel energy.

Yet the U.S. government is currently going in the opposite direction, cutting support for renewable energy while subsidizing the fossil fuel industries that endanger public health.

To really make America healthy, in our view, the country can’t ignore climate change.The Conversation

Jonathan Levy, Professor and Chair, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University; Howard Frumkin, Professor Emeritus of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington; Jonathan Patz, Professor of Environmental Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Vijay Limaye, Adjunct Associate Professor of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

  1. Community choice aggregation plan to reduce energy costs stalls due to Clearlake City Council vote, supervisors’ stance
  2. Missing person alert: Timothy Reed
  3. Little Hoover Commission plans virtual hearing on data centers and California electricity policy
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • 163
  • 164
How to resolve AdBlock issue?
Refresh this page